When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


Sovereign Funds: Latin America's Hidden Investment Potential

With its abundant raw materials and growing digital economy, Latin America has real potential for national investment funds.

In Sao Paulo, Brazil
In Sao Paulo, Brazil
Javier Capapé


MADRID — Sovereign wealth funds are no longer a mystery. A decade ago, names like the Qatar Investment Authority, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority or China Investment Corporation were entirely unfamiliar. Yet these and another 88 funds like them had assets worth $8 trillion by late 2018. That is equivalent to the annual GDPs of Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia and Chile combined.

These former strangers are emerging in countries not currently considered for their state investments. Cities like Doha, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Moscow, Oslo and Beijing have come to accumulate an unprecedented level of financial power. The 2018 report by Sovereign Wealth Research at Madrid's IE University, compiled in collaboration with Spain's investment promotion agency ICEX-Invest, showed some relevant trends.

1. Sovereign funds are many though a much smaller number of active funds have now taken a leading position. In 2018 these were Singapore's Temasek and GIC funds, and Abu Dhabi's ADIA and Mubadala. The latter is known in Argentina for absorbing the ADIC fund and recently investing $55 million in the public-sector oil firm Vista. These are followed by the Australian sovereign fund and Malaysia's Khazanah. These six together accounted for 80% of all operations in 2018.

2. Funds will typically engage in 180 operations a year, or just over three a week, with the total average value of investments reaching around $80 billion a year. That equaled to 2% of all the world's mergers and acquisitions in 2018. Talking about sectors, over the past three years funds mostly favored real estate. In 2018 their preference shifted to large-scale operations in chemicals, retail and e-trading/Fintech. The decline in real estate was in part for the relative scarcity of attractive investment options at a time of rising prices and fierce competition for a limited supply of assets.

3. Sovereign funds remain attracted to technology and recent (and not so recent) startups. In fact, 2018 was a record year for sovereign venture operations — meaning funds investing as venture capital firms, with venture capital money. Sovereign funds participated in 77 funding rounds last year, more more than one operation a week. It was the crest of a wave that began in 2014. Over this period, sovereign funds participated in 220 funding rounds, mostly in the United States and China. Today they are going beyond classical tech markets like the UK, Singapore and India, and Latin American startups are catching their attention. Mubadala has been investing in Brazil (99Taxis and Loggi), while Temasek took a share in Neoway, a Brazilian data analysis firm.

In March 2019, Japan's SoftBank decided to create the biggest venture capital firm focused on Latin America, with a $5-billion-dollar investment target. Its head is Marcelo Claure, a Bolivian entrepreneur, currently president of Sprint and head of Operations for SoftBank.

4. Sovereign funds have been growing, but also changing their investment strategies. They are now mature investors, as their portfolios show diversification by sector, location and asset. Portfolios with a classical or conservative selection of investments (60% equities, 40% fixed-income securities) have now expanded to include alternative assets including risk and venture capital projects, real estate and hedge funds.

Those that tend to venture into illiquid markets (like real estate) are funds with long-term missions (Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Qatar Investment Authority) or development funds with controlling stakes in the country's main public firms (Khazanah in Malaysia or the Emirates, or Mumtalakat in Bahrain). Funds with stabilization objectives (Russia, Chile or Botswana) keep more than 60% of their portfolios in liquid assets.

5. Co-investments. In 2018, we carried out an exhaustive analysis of sovereign funds' co-investment operations over the past 10 years. The main conclusion is that co-investment is not easy. The high amount of funds needed explains why only 22 of 91 funds have made co-investment operations on a big scale over a decade. The 2018 report reveals, however, that the funds do know how to operate jointly, and it was precisely a consortium led by Brookfield, with CIC and GIC participation, that acquired Petrobras gas transportation stakes worth over $5 billion in 2017. That was one of the five biggest operations that year.

6. Responsible investment and climate change remain fund objectives. The recent COP24 summit in Katowice, Poland, has added pressure and highlighted the importance of private capital to cover the needs of sustainable investment. Sovereign funds are not indifferent to this reality, which prompted the creation of the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Fund Working Group in December 2017. Its mission was to accelerate the integration of financial risks and opportunities relating to climate change into mass-scale asset management. Paradoxically, five of the Working Group's six founders are sovereign funds of leading oil and gas exporters. It is precisely these funds that have the most to both lose and gain from the opportunities and risks associated with climate change.

7. In Latin America, new, operative sovereign funds manage total assets of some $43 billion, 60% of which are handled by two Chilean funds. Presently there is particular regional interest in forming funds to manage the extraction and exploitation of natural resources (Suriname for example has voted to establish a sovereign fund to manage oil and gold extraction).

A notable development in the region is a near-20% fall in the value of Peru's fiscal stabilization fund. The reason was the withdrawal of monies needed for reconstruction efforts after flooding in March 2017. Chile made similar use of sovereign assets the year before, this time to tackle devastating fires. Both examples show the funds' potential stabilizing role in extreme weather events, but also the dramatic volatility in commodities prices.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


How A Drone Strike Inside Iran Exposes The Regime's Vulnerability — On All Fronts

It is still not clear what was the exact target of an attack by three armed drones Saturday night on an arms factory in central Iran. But it comes as Tehran authorities appear increasingly vulnerable to both its foreign and domestic enemies, with more attacks increasingly likely.

Screenshot of one of the Saturday drone attacks arms factory in Isfahan, central Iran

One of the Saturday drone attacks arms factory in Isfahan, central Iran

Pierre Haski


PARIS — It's the kind of incident that momentarily reveals the shadow wars that are part of the Middle East. No one has claimed responsibility for the attack by three armed drones Saturday night on an arms factory complex north of Isfahan in central Iran.

But the explosion was so strong that it set off a small earthquake. Iranian authorities have played down the damage, as we might expect, and claim to have shot down the drones.

Nevertheless, three armed drones reaching the center of Iran, buzzing right up to weapons factories, is anything but ordinary in light of recent events. Iran is at the crossroads of several crises: from the war in Ukraine where it's been supplying drones to Russia to its nuclear development arriving at the moment of truth; from regional wars of influence to the anti-government uprising of Iranian youth.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

That leaves us spoiled for choice when it comes to possible interpretations of this act of war against Iran, which likely is a precursor to plenty of others to follow.

Iranian authorities, in their comments, blame the United States and Israel for the aggression. These are the two usual suspects for Tehran, and it is not surprising that they are at the top of the list.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest