The Petrobras Scandal And The Future Of Brazilian Democracy

Revelations of massive corruption at Petrobras come with more than economic consequences. The credibility of the entire state is at stake. All eyes are on President Dilma Rousseff.

How can Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff deal with the "Petrobras earthquake"?
How can Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff deal with the "Petrobras earthquake"?


SANTIAGO — The corruption scandal inside Latin America's biggest firm, Brazil's Petrobras oil, was off the news radars for a few days. Now it has returned with a vengence. We are now seeing that this is a case bound to grow by the day, both in terms of implicating more individuals and the deeper ramifications.

It may be no exaggeration to say it could threaten President Dilma Rousseff's ability to govern, as she begins her second term.

For almost a year now, magistrates have investigated an increasingly complex web of fraudulent contracts, fake bills, bribes and money laundering that began years before, and have turned Petrobras into an informal bank of sorts, passing money from firms onto prominent members of the country's parliamentary, executive and party elite.

So far inquiries have shown suspicious payments worth around $9.1 billion, made between 2011 and 2014. Call it the "Petrobras earthquake," evidently one of the biggest scandals of its kind in Brazilian history.

The "bomb" effectively went off after federal police arrested one of the firm's directors, who began to name alleged accomplices in return for clemency. The names included those of top directors of six of the country's engineering and construction firms — contracting firms routinely working with Petrobras — and 30 or so senior or former state officials, mostly from Rousseff's Workers' Party (PT).

It turns out that the corruption began under the previous President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, when Rousseff was energy minister and effectively responsible for goings-on in Petrobras. Indeed as minister in 2009, she rejected investigators' indications of possible corruption in Petrobras.

The scandal is proving to be as financially damaging as it is noisy. Petrobras shares lost 65% of their value since September 2014, infuriating minority stockholders who include institutions and foreign funds. One of these, the city of Providence, Rhode Island, is taking action with courts in New York and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to check if Petrobras broke U.S. laws.

The expanding list of charges and revelations is creating problems for any and all sectors it touches. Building firms accused of involvement are finding it difficult to finance themselves on the money markets, and their participation in upcoming public works projects has become less likely. One of them, OAS, could not repay the $62 million it owed locally, with an early January deadline.

Friend of Dilma

There are doubts now about Petrobras's own ability to finance itself on the international markets. With annual sales worth $130 billion and earnings of around $10 billion in 2013, Petrobras can claim to be Latin America's biggest firm, but with debts of around $130 billion, also the most indebted.4

Petrobras HQ in Rio de Janeiro — Photo: galio

The situation may threaten the country's investment rating whose deterioration would immediately make credit more expensive for government and firms.

Yet the problem is not so much financial as institutional. Public opinion and investors see corruption as rampant in the government, legislature and the parties. That will make governing Brazil difficult for some years, and many believe the solution may involve an overhaul or reconstruction of national institutions.

Rousseff has reappointed her friend Maria das Graças Silva Foster as Petrobras chief. That was a mistake. The CEO may not have known what was happening there but she was still responsible. The public and markets would probably have welcomed her dismissal.

What Dilma needs now to govern is to recover trust. Even without Petrobras she faced a challenge in her second term: to relaunch faltering economic growth without significantly impacting the social policies that have taken 50 million Brazilians out of poverty in the past 15 years.

Reality is not helping her. Investment in Brazil fell 7% in 2014, and forecasts are of stagnation this year. The price of raw materials is dropping, while the annual growth rate, which hovered just below 2% in her first four-year term, has given way to recession. Brazil must turn its spending deficit into a surplus if it wants to avoid another reason for a credit downgrade, which is not easy in a country of wages calculated on the basis of prosperous times and incredibly generous pensions for public-sector employees.

Rousseff may have to implement austerity plans that will fuel unemployment and raise transport and public utility prices, but she imprudently promised in her campaign that austerity, while necessary, would be painless for Brazilians. Now add to this the non-stop revelations of the Petrobras mess.

The president effectively faces a historical task, to demolish part of Brazil's institutional architecture and establish new, solid bases for something new. She must lead by embracing total transparency, whatever the political costs. In recent weeks she has made market-friendly appointments and flirted with economic liberalization. She may not be sincere, but gestures matter. She had better believe that she will need private sector backing.

For now, the country must wait for the Petrobras aftershocks to subside so it can assess the damage and casualties: They will be considerable.

And that could be good. Brazil needs such an overhaul of its institutions, politics and economy to realize its ambitions of becoming a top global player. In that sense the Petrobras earthquake may one day be seen as a positive trigger. But this year and the next, it will leave a trail of individual victims and institutional destruction.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

A Mother In Spain Denied Child Custody Because She Lives In Rural Area

A court in Spain usurps custody of the one-year-old boy living with his mother in the "deep" part of the Galicia region, forced to instead live with his father in the southern city of Marbella, which the judge says is "cosmopolitan" with good schools and medical care. Women's rights groups have taken up the mother's case.

A child in Galician countryside

Laure Gautherin

A Spanish court has ordered the withdrawal of a mother's custody of her one-year-old boy because she is living in the countryside in northwestern Spain, where the judge says the child won't have "opportunities for the proper development of his personality."

The case, reported Monday in La Voz de Galicia, has sparked outrage from a women's rights association but has also set off reactions from politicians of different stripes across the province of Galicia, defending the values of rural life.

Judge María Belén Ureña Carazo, of the family court of Marbella, a city on the southern coast of 141,000 people, has ordered the toddler to stay with father who lives in the city rather than with his mother because she was living in "deep Galicia" where the child would lack opportunities to "grow up in a happy environment."

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - October 25, 2021

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - Monday 25 October, 2021

La Voz de Galicia

Better in a "cosmopolitan" city?

The judge said Marbella, where the father lives, was a "cosmopolitan city" with "a good hospital" as well as "all kinds of schools" and thus provided a better environment for the child to thrive.

The mother has submitted a formal complaint to the General Council of the Judiciary that the family court magistrate had acted with "absolute contempt," her lawyer told La Voz de Galicia.

The mother quickly accumulated support from local politicians and civic organizations. The Clara Campoamor association described the judge's arguments as offensive, intolerable and typical of "an ignorant person who has not traveled much."

The Xunta de Galicia, the regional government, has addressed the case, saying that any place in Galicia meets the conditions to educate a minor. The Socialist party politician Pablo Arangüena tweeted that "it would not hurt part of the judiciary to spend a summer in Galicia."

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!