When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Egypt Should Stop Dragging Its Feet On Renewable Energy

With its abundance of sunshine and adequate wind, Egypt is well suited to embrace green-energy alternatives. Instead it's opting for old-fashioned coal.

Egypt Should Stop Dragging Its Feet On Renewable Energy
Amena Sharaf


CAIRO — High prices of renewable energy are consistently used to justify Egypt's modest renewable energy ambitions, despite the country's natural assets such as high solar radiation and adequate wind speeds.

In 2014, in the face of an energy deficit, Egypt went in the opposite direction by resorting to coal as a source of energy. Since then, laws and policies have made way for the decision to take force, including modifications to Egypt's environmental law, which used to strictly forbid the use of coal as a source of electricity. The Federation of Egyptian Industries — coal's biggest fan — has often made the case for its low price and availability, also claiming that new technologies make clean coal possible.

Since then, subsidies have slowly but steadily been lifted, leaving the Egyptian people with rates of inflation reaching as high as 14%. But the energy deficit persists, and energy policies appear to be uncreative and shortsighted.

The energy deficit persists, and energy policies appear to be uncreative and shortsighted.

On the business side — apart from one promising investment of $4 billion from a variety of sources in the Benban solar park — a Chinese consortium has received the bid for a large coal-fired power station in the city of Hamrawein in the Red Sea governorate for $4.4 billion, and Russian state nuclear company Rosatom has made an investment of $21 billion in the city of Dabaa's nuclear power plant in the Matruh Governorate.

These three energy projects are expected to generate 1.6 gigawatts (GW), 6 GW and 1.2 GW of energy, respectively. But in the case of both the coal and nuclear plants, the construction price does not include costs of fuel, making the claim of financial viability questionable.

Falling behind

Energy strategies in countries like Indonesia and India — which are similar to Egypt in terms of GDP but have even greater energy consumption levels — are quite different. They stand next to economic giants like the United States, China and Canada, alongside Mexico and Brazil, to collectively account for 50% of the world's renewable energy in 2030. So what makes countries like India and Indonesia stand side-by-side, or at least realistically plan to, with the big players in terms of renewable energy, while Egypt falls behind?

The Indonesian Renewable Energy Strategy includes a specific rundown of renewable energy sources and energy demand. Targets set by Pertamina, Indonesia's state-owned energy group, include 2,300 megawatts (MW) of geothermal plants and 600 MW of solar energy by 2030, as well as 300 MW of wind and 200 MW of biomass power facilities, in addition to the distribution of 17,000 barrels of biofuel daily.

There is a strategic focus on small-scale biogas plants, which not only enables decentralized generation, but also provides jobs, increases community autonomy, boosts the local economy and contributes to energy security and independence. Energy efficiency plans are planned to reduce energy intensity by 17% across the transport, industrial, residential and service sectors. Reducing energy intensity in different industries indicates an increase of energy efficiency leading to an increase in the GDP contributed in comparison with the energy used in these respective industries.

Closer to home, the Moroccan Renewable Energy Strategy is another example of ambition. Renewable energy production has reached an all-time high of 34% in 2017, making the plans of reaching 42% by 2020 and 52% by 2030 quite realistic. The strategy also includes cutting coal power production from 37% to 26%, a drastic decrease of the use of one of Morocco's already-existing fuels, all the while increasing the share of wind power from 10% in 2015 to 15% in 2020 and 20% in 2030. Meanwhile, solar energy shares are to be increased from 2% in 2015 to 14% in 2020 and 20% in 2030.

Decentralized bio-fuel generation has proven to be a problem-solver not only in Morocco but in many countries, including India, Brazil, Ethiopia, Kenya and Mozambique. These countries — much like Egypt — have vast agricultural land and produce massive amounts of agricultural waste that are potential goldmines.

Jobs and savings

Morocco's regulatory framework of renewable energy production has also witnessed several amendments that have opened the door to self-producers and the introduction of net-metering (a system that allows entities and individuals to feed the national grid with electricity produced from solar energy during peak hours of solar radiation and credits them based on the amount of electricity produced to be remunerated in electricity equal to the amount produced and financially if the amount of electricity produced exceeds the electricity consumed).

Morocco's 2030 renewable energy strategy is set to decrease national emissions to 32% below business-as-usual (BAU) emissions (greenhouse gas emissions expected by the year 2030) in a scenario in which there is no change to the current Moroccan energy strategy.

Reducing emissions is not the only incentive for ambitious renewable energy strategies. In Indonesia, the plan's net reduction of energy system costs, along with mitigated emissions and air pollution, could stand to save the country $53 billion per year, the equivalent of 1.7% of its GDP. The strategy is also expected to lead to an increase in jobs in the renewable energy sector from 100,000 to 1.3 billion. The plan further provides Indonesia greater energy security since it will decrease its oil use by 9%, consequently decreasing its petroleum imports.

In Morocco, the renewable energy strategy places the country on the export side of the onshore wind power market. More than 13,000 direct jobs are expected to be created, in addition to the creation of over 36,000 jobs in the field of energy efficiency. Furthermore, cutting the heavy fossil fuel subsidies will allow the Moroccan government to offer renewable energy at affordable rates and fund research and development.

It's true that coal use is still very much present in Indonesia's energy strategy. But unlike Egypt, which is turning to coal at a time when it is being phased out globally, Indonesia has a long history of using coal. Also, Indonesia and Morocco use local coal, whereas Egypt has to import it. That's another thing that makes Egypt's insistence on using coal for power generation somewhat inexplicable.

Mixed messages

In comparison with the global trend, inconsistency clouds Egypt's plans. According to governmental sources, Egypt's renewable energy strategy aims at 20% renewable energy by 2022, a 2018 MOU with the European Parliament refers to 42% by 2035 as Egypt's official renewable energy target, news articles have Egypt's Minister of Electricity and Renewable Energy Mohamed Shaker announcing 37% by 2035 as the official target, while the minister has also been cited as announcing a target of 42% by 2035. The importance of renewable energy targets lies not only in the figures themselves, but in their acting as a frame of reference and an integral part of accountability mechanisms.

On the policy side, Egypt's energy strategy includes generic recommendations rather than specific energy policies. These include "strengthening deployment mechanisms for different renewable energies, and relevant monitoring systems' and "adopting a regulatory system for solar thermal and biomass applications."

The energy sector plays a vital role in any national strategy. Renewable energy penetration introduces a new skillset to the country's job market. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), not only does the deployment of renewables reduce greenhouse gases (and help safeguard public health and ecosystems), it also contributes to a significant boost of human welfare due to its contributions to job creation, education and changes in consumption patterns.

Egypt's solar radiation, one of the highest worldwide (and one and a half that of Indonesia's) in addition to rapidly plummeting prices of photovoltaic systems — one of the systems used to convert solar energy to electricity using solar cells — are bound to make solar energy more lucrative and much cheaper than coal, nuclear and even diesel in the near future. In Egypt's current energy and economic climate, a strong renewable energy strategy would contribute to solving the energy deficit but also contribute to the ever-volatile welfare of Egyptians.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Putinism Without Putin? USSR 2.0? Clean Slate? How Kremlin Succession Will Play Out

Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, political commentators have consistently returned to the question of Putin's successor. Russia expert Andreas Umland foreshadows a potentially tumultuous transition, resulting in a new power regime. Whether this is more or less democratic than the current Putinist system, is difficult to predict.

A kid holds up a sign with Putin's photograph over the Russian flag

Gathering in Moscow to congratulate Russia's President Vladimir Putin on his birthday.

Andreas Umland


STOCKHOLM — The Kremlin recently hinted that Vladimir Putin may remain as Russia's president until 2030. After the Constitution of the Russian Federation was amended in 2020, he may even extend his rule until 2036.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

However, it seems unlikely that Putin will remain in power for another decade. Too many risks have accumulated recently to count on a long gerontocratic rule for him and his entourage.

The most obvious and immediate risk factor for Putin's rule is the Russian-Ukrainian war. If Russia loses, the legitimacy of Putin and his regime will be threatened and they will likely collapse.

The rapid annexation of Crimea without hostilities in 2014 will ultimately be seen as the apex of his rule. Conversely, a protracted and bloody loss of the peninsula would be its nadir and probable demise.

Additional risk factors for the current Russian regime are related to further external challenges, for example, in the Caucasus. Other potentially dangerous factors for Putin are economic problems and their social consequences, environmental and industrial disasters, and domestic political instability.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest