When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Corsican flags fly at rally last week in favor of Catalan independence
Corsican flags fly at rally last week in favor of Catalan independence
Jean-Pierre Robin

-Analysis-

PARIS — The Catalan flag fluttered alongside the European flag and its 12 stars on Oct. 27, when Catalonia declared its independence from Spain. But Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission, didn't appreciate this tribute to Europe. "We shouldn't insert ourselves into what is an internal debate for Spain," he warned. "I wouldn't want the European Union to consist of 95 member states."

Ninety-five is the current number of regions in the EU, according to the NUTS classification (nomenclature of territorial units for statistics). But is Juncker right to worry? Could those regions, in the future, each separate from their respective nation-states?

Catalonia, Scotland, Lombardy, Veneto, Corsica: Separatist movements are gaining ground all over the continent, due in large part to the EU's single market, which safeguards access to trade outlets. On the worldwide scale too, globalization offers a de facto guarantee for broad access. In this sense, wouldn't California, a very international part of the United States thanks to the Silicon Valley and its cosmopolitan communities, stand to gain from being independent from the American federation?

Small certainly can be beautiful — and beneficial. The world's 12 richest countries (if we consider GDP per capita) are all small countries in terms of population. From Qatar to Switzerland, Singapore to Norway, none of those countries has more than 8.5 million inhabitants.

Changing context

Before the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars, Europe was divided between more than 300 kingdoms or independent principalities. Just one century later, after the unifications of Germany and Italy, the Old Continent had fewer than 20 sovereign countries. In 1945, the United Nations had just 51 members.

Since then, though, with decolonization and the breaking up of the Soviet bloc, the number of independent states hasn't stopped growing. There are now 193 member states among the United Nations, not to mention a handful of states with special status (Vatican, Taiwan, Palestine, etc.) and some 60 "territories," including tax havens.

Will the 21st century revive the provinces and the principalities of the pre-Revolution era? The liberalization of trade and the abolition of border customs favor the constitution of gigantic multinationals, especially in the technology sector. The GAFA — Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon — is the perfect illustration of this. But at the same time, globalization makes life easier for Lilliputian countries. And it encourages separatist movements.

One of the strongest arguments used in Britain by the pro-Brexit side — and a favorite of Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson — is that, outside of the EU, Great Britain will be able to negotiate free-trade agreements with any country it wants. Owing to their size, small countries have no choice but to be open, so much so that in Singapore, exports represent 175% of the GDP, calculated as such because the same product crosses the border several times during the manufacturing process.

Regional resentment

Far from being a disadvantage, smallness is an asset: On the one hand, it forces these countries to be flexible — an essential quality in the global market competition — and on the other hand, it strengthens solidarity, making microstates easier to manage.

The first Industrial Revolution, in the 19th century, encouraged the emergence of nation-states. Bismarck unified Germany thanks to industry. In contrast, the new context of globalization and the fourth Industrial Revolution brought about by the digital sector are exacerbating competition between individuals and thus undermining national solidarity. The nation-state is no longer the optimal size it once was for social life and economic activity.

More culturally homogeneous and more agile economically, individual regions are therefore tempted to go it alone. The richest complain of financial transfers, that they're bankrolling less prosperous regions to their own detriment. Catalonia is a case in point, with financial transfers said to be as high as 17 billion euros per year.

Such transfers are inevitable inside a country and, generally speaking, aren't seen as a problem. In France or in the United States, they're part of the national feeling, of the "desire to live together," as French philosopher Ernest Renan once put it. But by erasing national borders, widespread free-trade has stretched this link thin. So thin, in fact, that it can snap and ultimately disconnect a region from the rest of the country.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Jehovah's Witnesses Translate The Bible In Indigenous Language — Is This Colonialism?

The Jehovah's Witnesses in Chile have launched a Bible version translated into the native Mapudungun language, evidently indifferent to the concerns of a nation striving to save its identity from the Western cultural juggernaut.

A Mapuche family awaits for Chilean President Gabriel Boric to arrive at the traditional Te Deum in the Cathedral of Santiago, on Chile's Independence Day.

Claudia Andrade

NEUQUÉN — The Bible can now be read in Mapuzugun, the language of the Mapuche, an ancestral nation living across Chile and Argentina. It took the Chilean branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses, a latter-day Protestant church often associated with door-to-door proselytizing and cold calling, three years to translate it into "21st-century Mapuzugun".

The church's Mapuche members in Chile welcomed the book when it was launched in Santiago last June, but some of their brethren see it rather as a cultural imposition. The Mapuche were historically a fighting nation, and fiercely resisted both the Spanish conquerors and subsequent waves of European settlers. They are still fighting for land rights in Chile.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ