When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Headscratching choice
Headscratching choice
Paul-Henri du Limbert

-Op-Ed-

PARIS — Several decades of weakness and/or blindness have brought France to where it is today. A deeply divided country, where two camps are facing off with an animosity rarely seen in its recent past. An unhappy France vs. a happy France, a France of privilege vs. a France of exclusion, France from on high vs. France down below. No matter what you call it, the reality boils down to the same conclusion: The nation is split in two.

Those who, in the name of their guilty intellectual comfort, wanted to hide this reality were horrified on the night of the first round of elections. The voters who make up the "circle of reason" (as they call it in the upscale Paris neighborhood of Saint-Germain-des-Prés), that is, those of Emmanuel Macron and of François Fillon, were counted. They made up 44% of the votes. Those of Marine Le Pen, Jean-Luc Mélenchon and Nicolas Dupont-Aignan were also counted, and they, too, made up 44%. A protest vote as worrying as it is historic.

The issue is not to condemn these voters, and even less so to insult them, but rather to give them new reason for hope. In this regard, the remarks made by Macron in Le Figaro last week, "I heard the anger and I will take it into account," are welcome. Even if, clearly, a lot of real action needs to happen.

The first problem that has to be tackled is the endemic unemployment, a great source of extremist voting, as Francois Hollande's five-year term as president has so spectacularly demonstrated.

The extent of the anger means forgetting old certainties.

If he wins on Sunday, Macron will have to break down all the barriers that stand in the way of hiring, which the Left, as it races to turn France into a country with 6.5 million unemployed, calls "social gains."

But the future president will also have to confront the issues of security and immigration, with which Macron, a former investment banker and minister of the economy, is less familiar.

The extent of the anger expressed in the April 23 first round of voting will force him to grab the bull by the horns — and to forget the old certainty of coexistence cultivated nonchalantly at Socialist Party headquarters on Rue de Solferino.

Those close to Macron often describe their leader as particularly intelligent and audacious. Indeed, an abundance of intelligence and audacity he will need.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Coronavirus

Will China's Zero COVID Ever End?

Too much has been put in to the state-sponsored truth that minimal spread of the virus is the at-all-cost objective. But if the Chinese economy continues to suffer, Xi Jinping may have no choice but to second guess himself.

COVID testing in Guiyang, China

Cfoto/DDP via ZUMA
Deng Yuwen

The tragic bus accident in Guiyang last month — in which 27 people being sent to quarantine were killed — was one of the worst examples of collateral damage since the COVID-19 pandemic began in China nearly three years ago. While the crash can ultimately be traced back to bad government policy, the local authorities did not register it as a Zero COVID related casualty. It was, for them, a simple traffic accident.

The officials in the southern Chinese province of Guizhou, of course, had no alternative. Drawing a link between the deadly crash and the strict policy of Zero COVID, touted by President Xi Jinping, would have revealed the absurdity of the government's choices.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ