When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Democracy Is Fragile, An Eye From The Rubble Of Dictatorships

Protests in Madrid in October against plans to honor Franco.
Protests in Madrid in October against plans to honor Franco.
Ricardo Kirschbaum


BUENOS AIRES — Like health, peace or freedom, democracy is appreciated once it is lost. It has been 35 years now since democracy was restored in Argentina and Raúl Alfonsín became its elected, civilian president on Dec. 10, 1983. The military dictatorship became part of the past. It was a historic landmark. The balance of that period is a mix of undeniable achievements and glaring mistakes. But the best homage we could pay it would be to ask what the future holds for us.

What does one see today, not just here but elsewhere in the world? One sees repeated and brazen attempts at both ends of the political spectrum to weaken democracy and highlight social unease as a means of exhausting and discrediting democratic mechanisms. It is a disturbing panorama that is spreading and has already shown itself in the region. To this we may add that a good many political actors, whatever their position or constituencies, seem unable to meet the challenge of changes taking place. They are more focused on the past than on the enormity of unfolding events.

Spain's former prime minister, Felipe González, recently warned on the 40th anniversary of the Spanish constitution — written in 1978 after the end of General Francisco Franco's regime — that we are debating and presenting too many solutions for a past that is definitively gone, instead of discussing duties for a future that demands social justice and freedom. This is not valid just for Spain.

The list of challenges is immense: digitalization and robotization and their effects on employment; biotechnologies and advances in health and longevity that are shaking existing retirement systems; climate change and its impact; gender equality that is rebooting society and the family; the future of work; globalization; big data; drug trafficking; inequalities; education; widespread poverty...

The other observation is older. The novelist Jorge Luis Borges observed after reading Argentine writer and politician Domingo Sarmiento a rare intellectual quality in that man of letters. Sarmiento, he said, "achieves the feat of seeing the present in historical terms, simplifying it and sensing it as if it were already the past." A good deal or most of our political debates are going the other way: We talk about the past as if it were happening now, and are failing to see what is already taking shape as the future.

New governments promise radical reforms, but always with ideas from the past. Leaders are not seeing clearly how the challenges at hand are affecting the democratic system. Meanwhile extremist agents have returned with magic proposals to rectify our circumstances, with unknown consequences. Instead of resolving residual tensions with the past, these are exacerbated as a lethal tactic.

Citing Felipe González again, "We must recover the space of dialogue and understanding, because there is absolutely no reason for claiming that what was possible 40 years ago has become unattainable. Let us not open new trenches after sealing the ones the caused so much suffering." It is imperative to look at what is coming in order to consider the answers the future of democracy demands.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Wartime And Settlements: Preview Of Israel's Post-Netanyahu Era

Heated debate in Israel and abroad over the increase in the budget for settlements in the occupied West Bank is a reminder that wartime national unity will not outlast a deep ideological divide.

photo of people in a road with an israeli flag

A July photo of Jewish settlers in Nablus, West Bank.

Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images via ZUMA
Pierre Haski


PARIS — During wartime, the most divisive issues are generally avoided. Not in Israel though, where national unity does not prevent ideological divisions from breaking through into the public space.

Benny Gantz, a longtime Benjamin Netanyahu nemesis, who became a member of the War Cabinet after October 7, criticized the government's draft budget on Monday. It may sound trivial, but his target was the increased spending allocated for Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. Gantz felt that all resources should go towards the war effort or supporting the suffering economy — not the settlers.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

The affair did not go unnoticed internationally. Josep Borrell, the European High Representative for Foreign Policy, said that he was "appalled" by this spending on settlers in the middle of this war.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest