When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing. save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Peru

Apocalypse Fiction And COVID-19: Why Life Didn't Imitate Art

In the movie version, the contagion would lead to lawlessness and chaos. But in reality, institutions are encouragingly resilient.

The coronavirus pandemic has proven far less devastating than disaster films predicted
The coronavirus pandemic has proven far less devastating than disaster films predicted
Farid Kahhat

-OpEd-

LIMA — The post-apocalyptic movie genre has done little to boost our faith in humankind's ability to cooperate in dire circumstances. It's worth noting, therefore, that in the face of the current real-life calamity — and with the exception of certain institutional problems (with the World Health Organization for example) — we haven't, by and large, seen a generalized, institutional collapse. What's more, this period of radical adversity has even produced episodes of empathy and cooperation.

Consider the film 28 Days After, with its disconcerting scenes of vacant cities emptied of all passers-by. That was fiction, but during the coronavirus lockdowns ordered in different communities around the world, things looked eerily similar. Still, there's a big difference between the two: In the film, everyone had died, fled or hidden in terror, while in our real-life case, people were at home, following the instructions of functioning administrations . There were also spontaneous demonstrations of gratitude to those risking their lives to save the community, like doctors and nurses.

This period of radical adversity has even produced episodes of empathy and cooperation.

The action in post-apocalyptic films usually starts after the collapse of civilization, perhaps because depicting the sudden collapse of institutions and the breakdown of social cooperation is not always convincing. Indeed, in the real world, there's nothing actually inevitable about that kind of mayhem.In The Lord of the Flies , the 1954 novel by William Golding, a group of schoolboys is stranded on an island. When finally rescued, the officer in charge of the mission finds a desolate, barbaric scenario of internecine rivalries and violence that cost three of the boys their lives.

Interestingly, in 1965 — just about a decade after the book was published — six Australian schoolboys really did find themselves stranded on an island. A ship rescued them 15 months later, but unlike in the novel, the officer in charge found that the youngsters had duly organized themselves and shared tasks to ensure their survival. These included caring for a schoolmate who had broken a leg.

In "World War Z," Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) tries to stop a zombie pandemic — Photo: Paramount Pictures/ZUMA

Paradoxically, Golding won a Nobel Prize in 1983 and his novel has been translated into dozens of languages and filmed twice. The real incident, on the other hand, went unnoticed until documented only recently by historian Rutger Bregman of the Netherlands.

Lastly, a recent study shows that with due consideration for factors like age, sex and personality, people who love apocalyptic films are actually more likely to demonstrate adaptability and resilience in the face of a pandemic. A lecturer at the University of Chicago explained this by saying that if the film is good, "You are drawn into the plot, adopt the characters' perspective and unwittingly enact its situations."

In other words, our ability to carry out mental exercises may have unsuspected, eminently practical applications. Go figure!

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Violence Against Women, The Patriarchy And Responsibility Of The Good Men Too

The femicide of Giulia Cecchettin has shaken Italy, and beyond. Argentine journalist Ignacio Pereyra looks at what lies behind femicides and why all men must take more responsibility.

A protester's sign referring to the alleged killer reads: Filippo isn't a monster, he's the healthy son of the patriarchy

Matteo Nardone/Pacific Press via ZUMA Press
Ignacio Pereyra

Updated Dec. 3, 2023 at 10:40 p.m.

-Essay-

ATHENS — Are you going to write about what happened in Italy?, Irene, my partner, asks me. I have no idea what she's talking about. She tells me: a case of femicide has shaken the country and has been causing a stir for two weeks.

As if the fact in itself were not enough, I ask what is different about this murder compared to the other 105 women murdered this year in Italy (or those that happen every day around the world).

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here .

We are talking about a country where the expression "fai l'uomo" (be a man) abounds, with a society so prone to drama and tragedy and so fond of crime stories as few others, where the expression "crime of passion" is still mistakenly overused.

In this context, the sister of the victim reacted in an unexpected way for a country where femicide is not a crime recognized in the penal code, contrary to what happens, for example, in almost all of Latin America.

Keep reading... Show less

The latest