When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Syria's TV Industry Takes Another Crack At Comedy — Is That A Joke?

After a decade of conflict, once-popular Syrian comedies have lost their shine. New shows are trying to revive the country's golden era of TV, but comedy is a tough sell in a country still living under a brutal dictatorship.

Image of two officers sitting next to and talking to one another on the couch in an office .

Syrian tv show “A Minister’s Decision,” which depicts the heroism of honorable officials who are constantly struggling with corruption.

Omar Bakbook

The “Golden Era” of Syrian comedies, when shows produced in the country were a sought-after commodity on Arab satellite stations, has been over since the 90s. Since then, the Syrian conflict has clearly hastened the decline of the medium.

Now, a new batch of Syrian comedies are trying to revive the style — but is it too late?

The series Bokaat Daw ("Spotlight"), which went on the air in 2001, was a landmark of Syrian drama. The show dared to take on forbidden themes and subjects, at a time when TV shows were more often propaganda disguised as entertainment, and when everything was subject to strict government control, with whole episodes sometimes censored.

The oppression and violence Syria experienced during the first years of the revolution pushed some filmmakers away from comedy, which some felt didn't fit the dramatic experiences the country's people were living through. Confronting the Syrian regime through comedy also became more complex than ever.

Is there room for laughs after 2012?

Many top comedy stars saw their careers end as the situation in the country slid into civil war in 2012.

Because of the political situation, some drama producers felt they had to justify the need to keep making comedies. The producers of the series “Family Crisis” said that they pursued comedy to bring Syrians some levity at a difficult time.

But as comedy actors tried to approach what the country is going through, they fell into many traps, like the actress Amal Arafa from the series “Contact" who was accused of callously mocking the victims of chemical weapon attacks.

Official media is trying to convince the public to accept poverty and hunger.

Others found themselves caught in the “censorship ceiling,” which became increasingly lower. Now, comedy has become more like an obituary for the Syrian people, rather than a form of entertainment, and “corpses” appeared often, as if this was a natural and permanent matter in their lives.

Syrian comedy is still looking for a different form, to find its way to screens again and to entertain audiences. This year, a new genre has emerged: a hybrid format, half comedy, half cooking show featuring recipes for Ramadan. Many new Syrian comedies use this template. But many of these shows have common traits, which include a lack of first-class stars, slow pacing and poor cinematography, lighting and music.

It is worth mentioning that cooking programs during Ramadan have been criticized in recent years. Some programs have been accused of suggesting dishes that Syrians, suffering a continued economic crisis, cannot afford. Others have been criticized for suggesting cheap food alternatives, which has led to suggestions that official media is trying to convince the public to accept poverty and hunger.

This new format ends up satisfying everyone but the viewer.

Image of one woman in three different shots where she's wearing different outfits, the last shot is in black and white. All three pictures are from looks of characters from her tv shows

Syrian Actress Amal Arafa from the series “Contact".


A minister's choice 

Still, there have been other recent attempts to change the Syrian comedy landscape. The series “Sabaya” tries to prove that the golden days are not over yet.

It falls short of this aim, although “Sabaya" is the least problematic series among Syrian comedies this year. The plot is weak, but it at least succeeds in portraying a lifestyle that can be accepted and understood: a group of girls living together, encountering a challenge or prank in each episode. But of course, it's still full of objectification and stereotyping of women, which highlights the fact that the series was directed and created by two men.

The Syrian regime conceals the drug Captagon for export.

Another new show this year, “A Minister’s Decision,” appears interesting because it raises questions about the meaning of Syrian comedies today. It depicts the heroism of honorable officials who are constantly struggling with corruption. We do not see only one side of the story in this show, but two different perspectives: the national officials who are keen on helping the citizens, those who do not hesitate to fight corruption.

But it raises a few questions: where does comedy come from? Is it the dialogue style? The jokes? Or in the paradoxes that reveal how naïve victims of corruption are, or how “skilled” the minister is?

There are no answers, but what we can say for sure is that comedy has come too late. The real jokes are serious news when it comes to corruption and the regime in Syria. Tell me, what's funnier: a sleeping policeman on duty, or watching a report revealing how the Syrian regime conceals the drug Captagon for export?

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Why Poland's Break With Ukraine Weakens All Enemies Of Russia — Starting With Poland

Poland’s decision to stop sending weapons to Ukraine is being driven by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party's short-term electoral calculus. Yet the long-term effects on the world stage could deeply undermine the united NATO front against Russia, and the entire Western coalition.

Photo of ​Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Lutsk, Ukraine, on July 9

Bartosz T. Wieliński


WARSAW — Poland has now moved from being the country that was most loudly demanding that arms be sent to Ukraine, to a country that has suddenly announced it was withholding military aid. Even if Poland's actions won't match Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki’s words, the government has damaged the standing of our country in the region, and in NATO.

“We are no longer providing arms to Ukraine, because we are now arming Poland,” the prime minister declared on Polsat news on Wednesday evening. He didn’t specify which type of arms he was referring to, but his statement was quickly spread on social media by leading figures of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

When news that Poland would be withholding arms to Ukraine made their way to the headlines of the most important international media outlets, no politician from PiS stepped in to refute the prime minister’s statement. Which means that Morawiecki said exactly what he meant to say.

The era of tight Polish-Ukrainian collaboration, militarily and politically, has thus come to an end.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest