When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


Lime Squeezers, Sheep And Boot Lickers: How To Insult A Post-Revolution Egyptian

After the Arab spring, the way people put each other down has evolved with events on the streets. Here's a glossary of all you need to know to verbally smack down your adversary.

Say it loud
Say it loud

CAIRO — After the January 25 2011 revolution, Egypt’s political sphere suddenly cracked wide open for stormy debates about concepts that swung between the super shallow and predictable, to the extremely deep and philosophical.

The ongoing disagreements and political struggles have generated much re-evaluation, as well as some aggressive reactions. One of the most widely impactful phenomena born during this period is labeling. Due to this labeling, many have complained that opinions are not being discussed as much as the individuals behind them are.

Here’s a dictionary of terms to use in a conversation about the revolution to demoralize your opponents without having to actually prove your point or try to understand where they’re coming from.

The Tahrir people — Bitouå al-tahrir

This was the phrase used in the very early days of the revolution to describe the masses of demonstrators sitting in Cairo’s central public square, blocking traffic and stopping the tourists from coming to Egypt.

[rebelmouse-image 27087789 alt="""" original_size="640x397" expand=1]

2 million people protesting in Tahrir Square on Feb 11 2011. Photo by Jonathan Rashad via Creative Commons.

The revolutionaries — al-sowwar

Under pressure from internal and external sources, the state-controlled media outlets had to change their tone and stop being aggressive toward demonstrators. The resulting acceptance of revolutionary acts was accompanied by fatherly attempts to contain the demands and isolate them from the possibility of real change.

Revolutionary youth — shabab al-thawra

After the fall of Mubarak’s regime, which was beneficial to more than one political player in the scene, there were two main “unmentionables” that needed to be eliminated from the equation. This was not a coup, nor was it an Islamic revolution. There had to be a figure to reward/blame who was not an actual body with any actual ambition. Anybody between the age of 16 and 40 who expressed support for the revolution were called “revolutionary youth.” There were subtle implications of recklessness and lack of both vision and organization.

Human rights people — bitouå ho.ou el-insan; later turned into ‘activists’ — noshataa

Democracy, public participation, critical masses, coexistence and political balance maps. Strange expressions like these were being heard for the first time by a lot of people. Many felt even just the way these words sounded were an alien concept. A tough reaction was taken toward mumblings of this sort.

Honorable citizens — mowatineen shorafaa

When Egypt was being ruled by a bunch of old army generals calling themselves SCAF, a lot of unfortunate events happened on the streets of Cairo and elsewhere. Violence between demonstrators and police had become too mainstream, so demonstrators decided to fight each other. The residents of a specific area would sometimes rise up to throw stones at demonstrators chanting anti-SCAF chants. Since then, people showing unconditional support toward the authorities have been called honorable citizens. Other expressions, suggesting that such people work in the sex industry, have also been used.

The couch party — hizb al-kanaba

If you can’t convince a person why revolution is a good thing, you can just call him a member of the couch party. He will not like you anymore, but it will spare you finding difficult answers to his, and maybe your own, taboo questions like: Why is the revolutionary act so holy? What is martyrship? Is revolution good because it’s a revolution, or because of the way it changes things? ... etc.

Remnants of the Mubarak regimefeloul

We all know who the bad guys are? … Cool, let’s move on.

Lime squeezers — åasiry al-laymoun

For a lot of Egyptian revolutionaries and intellectuals, bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power — even though it turned out to be a threat to their own lifestyles and personal values — was a better choice than voting for Ahmad Shafiq, Mubarak’s last prime minister and the strong face of the old regime’s ambitions. In Egypt, squeezing the proverbial lime on yourself is what you do when you force yourself into a choice you hate. It’s an act of weakness by a group of people who don’t have many choices.

Soft elite — al-nokhba al-tariyya

The values behind which choosing Morsi was being justified needed to be completely eliminated. Voices going on about things like “the necessity of respecting the people’s choice” and similar (soft) opinions needed to be discredited as quickly as possible. Certain other players did not want such pressures bringing into question the legitimacy of their plans.

Glue sniffers — shammameen al-kulla

After the euphoria of January 25, it was quite difficult to justify going out onto the streets. The elephant in the room finally became talked about: You brought this mess to the country and it’s time for you to shut up, for ever. Any solidarity with physical presence on the ground, any alignment with pure revolutionary values in contrast to real practical political gains, is called “glue sniffing.” And you will be preserved by society as a “glue sniffer,” like the homeless children who live on downtown Cairo streets and sniff glue to get high, a lot of whom were killed during revolution by police. This specific label — after June 30, 2013 to increase further in importance — with its obvious classist insensitivity and cruelty is very reflective of the reactionary nature of the majority who benefited from the system. Waiting for the economy, security and general morale to be bad enough for your argument to shine is such a capitalist technique.

Freelance activists — noshataa al-sabbouba

With a deliberately cartoonish impersonation of a fake posh accent, you can call any individual talking about democracy a “freelance activist.” This label contrives to associate these values with corruption, bad intentions and alien-ness from Egyptian society. Now the aggression against these democratic opinions is aimed toward socially isolating them and whipping up the hatred of the general public.

Sheep — khirfan

The Brotherhood are famous for being very organized. The have very tight hierarchy and leadership protocols. A lot of young people among the Brotherhood have been called “sheep” for following assignments they have from above without personal critical thinking. I don’t know how people using terms like these thought they would help the Brotherhood youth like them more, but what I know for sure is that it didn’t create a very friendly environment.

Sawiris’s dogs — kilab sawierse; later ‘Tawadros’s dogs’ — kilab Tawadros

A lot of voices among the Islamist project really, really hate Christians. They also think that any harm to the political Islam project is nothing but a Christian effort to destroy Islam. A lot of journalists or public voices who were critical of the Brotherhood’s performance have been called the dogs of Tawadros (the pope) because they have probably been pet by him to bark at the Muslims.

Terrorists — irhabiyeen

After the military’s interference in the political sphere, for some reason a lot of terrorists suddenly appeared and wanted to kill Egyptians. Anti-military acts — starting from bombing cars and gunfights with military personnel, all the way down to throwing stones, demonstrating or writing anti-military Facebook statuses — were all considered terrorist acts. Long story short: Terrorists don’t like the military, the military likes you, and so if you don’t like the military, you are a terrorist.

Coupers — inquilabiyeen

People who think that June 30 2013 wasn’t a military coup don’t like it being called a military coup. People who think it was a coup don’t like it being called a revolution. People who think June 30 was not a coup don’t like being called coup supporters and the people who think it was a coup like calling them so. Eventually, the people who don’t like June 30 2013 being referred to as a coup decided that it is a coup and they like it way.

[rebelmouse-image 27087790 alt="""" original_size="640x480" expand=1]

Photo by RamyRaoof via Flickr

Military boot lickers — laåiquy al-biyada

The word used for “lickers” is such sophisticated, classic Arabic. Even though it’s meant to spread among people as if it’s organic, there is an Islamist flavor in it that you can sense, maybe because it sounds like it was formulated in the 1940s. Even if the Muslim Brotherhood are not behind it, you will very much likely be accused of being a Brotherhood member if you use it. Because very few people are able to understand that being critical of the military could be practiced without benefiting the Brotherhood.

Effeminates — mokhannathein

The more grandiloquent version of the term “sissies” — how ironic — was manufactured by intellectuals who aligned themselves with the military to describe the intellectuals who didn’t. It is used usually in conversations in which people are talking about the gravity of using excessive force against demonstrators, or random arrests. The term, sunk in misogyny, is quite reflective of the failed state of Egyptian intellectualism right now. The failure that Egyptian intellectuals sensed in all their attempts to communicate with the masses of Egyptians, either through democratic battles for political participation, through media appearances, or through trying to have any real impact on the culture.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


"Imperfect" Victims, Hidden Progress: Why MeToo In Italy Is Different

A recent wave of testimony from inside the Italian entertainment industry again failed to gain much attention, another example of MeToo failing to take off in the traditionally sexist country. There are multiple explanations, though also quieter signs that something may be changing.

Photo of two women at a feminist protest in Italy

Two women at a feminist protest in Italy

Ginevra Falciani

For a few fleeting hours, it seemed the MeToo movement might finally break out of the shadows in Italy: the internet was buzzing after the La Repubblica daily had published the testimonies of several actresses recounting the sexual harassment they’d faced.

A week later, on Jan. 16, the associations Amleta and Differenza Donna held a press conference to report that 223 additional testimonies of sexual harassment and violence in show business had arrived since the La Repubblica article.

The activists broke the cases down by gender (in all but two cases the abusers were men, and 93% of the victims were women) and by job title (directors made up 41% of the abusers, followed by actors, producers, teachers, casting directors, agents, critics, and even some audience members). But it was also notable that only 12 actresses had brought their cases to court, and that the names of those accused would not be revealed so as not to compromise ongoing legal actions.

A few newspapers reported the news. Then, nothing more.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest