When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
The less men think, the more they talk ( Montesquieu)
The less men think, the more they talk ( Montesquieu)
Assad,Erdogan(Screen-shots) Mubarak ( World Economic Forum) Romney (Gage Skidmore)
Francesca Paci

-Essay-

Who is really behind the scenes in Taksim Square? Ignoring the discontent emanating from the population, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Recep Erdogan points the finger squarely at the TV cameras of the BBC and CNN. In doing so, he is copying tactics used by dictators in difficulty all over the world.

On March 30, 2011, long before the Syrian revolt turned into civil war, President Bashar al-Assad appeared on state television blaming the riots on the work of “foreign conspirators” and the lies of the “satellite broadcasters.” Two years and 95,000 deaths later, his supporters in the Alawite enclave of Tartus continue to use the Internet to spread the notion that the “international media” has legitimized the rebels’ cause.

Damascus’s claims parallel those of now deposed Tunisian dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, and Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, both so unaccustomed to the mere concept of opposition that they pinned the blame for the – in their eyes otherwise inexplicable – revolts on the media. “The press and TV are destroying the country,” raged Mubarak on February 10, 2011 while his henchmen hunted down foreign reporters.

Irony in Internet age

Now Mubarak’s long-term nemesis, the Muslim Brotherhood is mimicking its authoritarian predecessor to such an extent that six months ago in Washington, President Mohammed Morsi stated that the protests against the new constitution were due to “evil propaganda” being spread by the U.S. media.

This appears to be an inevitable reflex of struggling dictators. When people took the streets after the controversial results of the 2009 Iranian elections were released, Teheran and the state media laid the blame firmly at the door of the international media. “When announcing the results of the vote, which didn’t favor their candidate, some international media – like BBC Persia, al-Arabiya, Fox and CNN – created the social and political divisions which led to the conflict”.

Hugo Chavez used to tell the same story, which has now been taken up by the Venezuelan Minister of Commerce Alejandro Fleming who claims international media outlets are “installing fear in consumers” to turn them against the government.

Authoritarian regimes take particular issue with the international press, which they believe to be less easily influenced. Just a few months ago, Chinese state TV channel CCTV broadcasted the “confession” of a Tibetan rebel who revealed that it was Voice of America that convinced him to set fire to himself “to become a hero.” In 2011, the spokesperson for Foreign Minister Jiang Yu used the same arguments to explain away the sit-in by human rights activists in the Beijing shopping street Wangfujing.

In short, Erdogan’s response is nothing new. Even in the democratic world political leaders blow hot and cold with the press. Obama’s former contender, Mitt Romney, like Sarah Palin before him, clashed with reporters after having his gaffes regularly highlighted. Unlike their colleagues working under dictatorships, American reporters continued to cover his blunders without thinking twice. It is, perhaps, ironic that while new technology often seems to be sending traditional media outlets into crisis mode, dictatorships continue to see them as the source of all their woes.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Sham Trial, Public Hanging: The Method To Iran's "Exemplary" Execution Of Protester

By executing a protester after a rapid trial, Iran's clerical regime has taken its clampdown on the once-in-a-generation uprising to a new level. Observers fear there are more to come soon.

Photo of protesters holding photographs

Protesters against the Iranian regime at the Hague

ANP via ZUMA
Kayhan-London

-Analysis-

Iranians were infuriated by the Islamic judiciary's execution Thursday morning of a 23-year-old protester, Mohsen Shekari. Opposition media and Iranians on social media called it murder. The public hanging, on charges that Shekari took part in the stabbing of a state agent in Tehran, showed the regime is hellbent on crushing weeks of protests and silencing calls for regime change.

Shekari was arrested in protests in downtown Tehran on Sept. 25, and convicted of having injured a state security agent with a knife. The formal charges against him — and various other jailed protesters — was "waging war on God" a part of the Iranian penal code that is punishable by death, though he barely was afforded minimal legal proceedings. According to reports, Shekari was not given the right to select his own lawyer, nor was he given a chance to defend himself at the sentencing trial.

An informed source told Kayhan-London that when a lawyer sought to take up Shekari's defense, prosecutors told him Shekari had waived his right to choose a lawyer. So the court assigned him one who was no doubt obedient to the judiciary.

There were various discrepancies in the case. The state agent stabbed in Tehran that day was reportedly wearing nothing to indicate his status as law enforcement — although he was busy beating demonstrators — nor was there even evidence to prove that Shekari had stabbed him.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest