When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

Feeding Hungry Consumers With "Fast Fashion"

H&M, Zara, Mango and Irish upstart Primark are flooding the market with new styles at low prices. Is this good for us? Or for the world?

Primark shop in Berlin
Primark shop in Berlin
Silke Wichert

MUNICH — Moschino's 2014 spring-summer collection, designed by Jeremy Scott, was meant to be a humorous homage to fast food. But it could also have been a metaphor for how the fashion industry itself seems to be evolving.

In addition to the regular seasonal lines, clothing companies have taken to offering small, fast-food-like "bites" at increasing intervals. These fashion bites take the form of in-between products and special collections. Some shops, as a result, now receive up to 24 deliveries per annum.

It is not often the case that people who work in fashion are of one opinion. But they all agree that fashion, as a general trend, has become incredibly fast-moving. More and more clothes are flooding the market at ever shorter intervals to boost sales of more and more clothes. That's, at least, what the fashion industry is hoping for. But does the strategy really work?

One thing is clear: Never have we owned as many clothes as we do nowadays. On average, Germans currently buy five new items of clothing per month — approximately 60 items per year. This rate is nothing unusual in the Western world. In the United States, in 1991, people bought 40 new items per capita per year. By 2013, the number had risen to 64. British women, for their part, have four times as many clothes in their wardrobe now as they did in the 1980s.

Are we buying too many clothes? If we answer the question based on the number of clothing items a human being can wear on a regular basis, then yes. According to a Greenpeace study conducted in 2015, of the nearly 5.2 billion items of clothing in German wardrobes, approximately 2 billion (nearly 40%) are "worn seldom or never."

Cheap thrills

Our consumer behavior has changed dramatically due to the influence of the fast-fashion phenomenon. H&M, Zara, Mango and the Irish newcomer Primark have flooded the market with cheap goods. The money we spend on clothes has risen in the last few years but, relatively speaking, we actually spend less than we did in the past. While we spent about 10% of our disposable income on clothes and shoes in the 70s, we only spent about 5% in 2015. We buy more but spend less — and our brains just love it!

A 2007 study by researchers from Stanford University and MIT Massachusetts found that like sex and drugs, looking at a desirable piece of clothing stimulates the brain's reward center. They then showed the test person the price of the desired article in question, a consideration that, according to Scott Rick, head of the study, correlated with the brain's pain center. "The higher the price, the higher the level of perceived pain," says Rick.

But a supposed bargain or good deal, on the other hand, caused an even more pronounced feeling of happiness. Double the rush, if you will. "What was particularly interesting to see was that the actual kick seems to be felt at the time of purchase," says Rick. Like with drugs, however, the effect wears off quite quickly afterwards. Many people, as a result, essentially become addicted to finding the next bargain. This may explain why some people think they need new clothes all the time despite having wardrobes full of unworn clothes.

We are what we buy

Last February, the Daily Mail published an article about Kim Kardashian. No surprise there. Except rather than focus, as one might expect, on whatever new fashion ensemble Kardashian was sporting, the article drew attention to fact that she hadn't changed clothing. She'd worn the same outfit two days in a row — how scandalous!

How silly too. And yet, when was the last time you wore the same outfit to work or school two days in a row? The question points to the link between fashion and behavior, and how people express themselves through the goods they consume.

Consuming is a much larger part of our lives now than it used to be. Sociologists see a link here to the waning influence of families, clubs and churches. Without those guides, people use consumer goods to build their identities and seek out society-binding norms.

There's also a therapeutic aspect to consuming. Those who want to treat themselves buy something new. And those who are in a bad mood most certainly want to treat themselves by buying something new.

The sharing economy?

Shopping has long been a pleasurable pastime. With Internet shopping, available 24/7, the trend has accelerated. "Shopping has become much too easy," says Scott Rick, who conducted the MIT study and who now teaches marketing at the University of Michigan. "Everything you see is only a click away. This increases the risk of buying too much too often."

And thanks to the instant payment service PayPal, customers don't even have to root around for their credit card every time they buy something. Rick says that if shopping were more painful and more difficult, people would automatically buy less. Studies have shown that people spend much less money if they pay cash rather than with their cards.

But what if we could constantly wear new clothes that are not necessarily our own? Ownership has become quite a relative term in many sectors of our lives. Car sharing or borrowing films and music online has become a trend.

Kirsten Brodde of Greenpeace thinks this may be a promising concept that may possibly be applicable to fashion. This could be achieved through so-called "clothesaries" that work like libraries, with apps that connect private people and their products for a limited period of time. And online stores that rent clothes for a fee and may even provide fashion flat rates, like Netflix. These clothes would most certainly not hang unused in your wardrobe for long as the owner would remind you, in time, that the lending period is coming to an end.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Jehovah's Witnesses Translate The Bible In Indigenous Language — Is This Colonialism?

The Jehovah's Witnesses in Chile have launched a Bible version translated into the native Mapudungun language, evidently indifferent to the concerns of a nation striving to save its identity from the Western cultural juggernaut.

A Mapuche family awaits for Chilean President Gabriel Boric to arrive at the traditional Te Deum in the Cathedral of Santiago, on Chile's Independence Day.

Claudia Andrade

NEUQUÉN — The Bible can now be read in Mapuzugun, the language of the Mapuche, an ancestral nation living across Chile and Argentina. It took the Chilean branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses, a latter-day Protestant church often associated with door-to-door proselytizing and cold calling, three years to translate it into "21st-century Mapuzugun".

The church's Mapuche members in Chile welcomed the book when it was launched in Santiago last June, but some of their brethren see it rather as a cultural imposition. The Mapuche were historically a fighting nation, and fiercely resisted both the Spanish conquerors and subsequent waves of European settlers. They are still fighting for land rights in Chile.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ