When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing. save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
China

Chinese Couples Looking To Duck New Property Taxes Opt For Divorce

This is an innocent conversation in Beijing. Others, maybe not so much?
This is an innocent conversation in Beijing. Others, maybe not so much?
Chen Wenya

BEIJING - To stem surging housing prices and curb speculation, China has recently issued a new policy that enables local governments to impose a 20% tax on profits earned from the sale of a second home.

This is a huge hike from the current 1-2% tax. The move immediately triggered panic among the affluent class -- and almost just as quickly, creative ways to avoid the tax. The most popular method? Well, get a divorce .

Chen Xu, a Beijing lawyer, says that he has been receiving more and more phone calls about the feasibility of getting divorced without actually leaving your spouse and home, that is, faking a divorce .

Mrs. Ma is one of the Beijing residents anxious about whether or not she should get divorced before the new tax rules come into effect. Mrs. Ma and her husband own two apartments together, but they want to sell one of the apartments to buy a new one in a better school district. The prices of the two apartments they bought quite cheaply more than five years ago have increased four and five-fold, which means they would pay a huge amount of property tax on them. However, if the couple gets “divorced,” they could each own one apartment and avoid paying the 20% capital gains tax.

Fake divorces are nothing new in China – the phenomenon started appearing a few years ago when some Chinese cities introduced measures to restrict home ownership to one per couple . "Before it was only the buyers who needed to get divorced whereas now it applies also to the couples wanting to sell," said Mrs. Ma.

A million sham divorces

Professor Xie Baisan from Fudan University says the phenomenon first appeared in 2009, when couples tried to avoid paying much higher i nterest rates on mortgages taken out for the purchase of second homes. He believes the new housing policy could lead to one million fake divorces in China.

Most often these couples have a proviso in their divorce agreement stating that they still live together. Some will even remarry once the mortgage has been taken out or the property tax has been paid.

Professor Xie understands why getting a fake divorce is so popular. "The housing price in Shanghai’s good school district has gone up eight to tenfold in the last decade. Instead of paying 70 Yuan ($11) to get divorced and another 70 Yuan to be remarried, you would be insane to want to pay hundreds of thousands in property tax,” he says.

Chen Xu doesn’t agree with Professor Xie. He says that getting a fake divorce involves great legal risks. If the couple does end up separating for real, one of the spouses could end up losing his or her share of the jointly owned assets. Also, he says, the act of divorce can be emotionally and psychologically damaging.

According to Chen Xu, the government needs to review its housing policy to curb the phenomenon. For instance, he says, couples who sell their second homes to improve their primary residences should not be punished.

Shi Jie, a lawyer who is also a member of the China’s consultative assembly, the CPPCC , believes that if there are no penalties for breaking the law – i.e. getting a fake divorce – then the law will stop being effective. He says such behavior should be punished or that China’s credit system should be adapted to this new reality. In effect, poor credit ratings could be implemented for people who commit “policy divorces,” and this rating could impact employment, loans and medical care.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Ideas

Look At This Crap! The "Enshittification" Theory Of Why The Internet Is Broken

The term was coined by journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the fatal drift of major Internet platforms: if they were ever useful and user-friendly, they will inevitably end up being odious.

A person holding their smartphone

Gilles Lambert/ ZUMA
Manuel Ligero

-Analysis-

The universe tends toward chaos. Ultimately, everything degenerates. These immutable laws are even more true of the Internet .

In the case of media platforms, everything you once thought was a good service will, sooner or later, disgust you. This trend has been given a name: enshittification . The term was coined by Canadian blogger and journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the inevitable drift of technological giants toward... well.

The explanation is in line with the most basic tenets of Marxism. All digital companies have investors (essentially the bourgeoisie, people who don't perform any work and take the lion's share of the profits), and these investors want to see the percentage of their gains grow year after year. This pushes companies to make decisions that affect the service they provide to their customers. Although they don't do it unwillingly, quite the opposite.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here .

Annoying customers is just another part of the business plan. Look at Netflix , for example. The streaming giant has long been riddling how to monetize shared Netflix accounts. Option 1: adding a premium option to its regular price. Next, it asked for verification through text messages. After that, it considered raising the total subscription price. It also mulled adding advertising to the mix, and so on. These endless maneuvers irritated its audience, even as the company has been unable to decide which way it wants to go. So, slowly but surely, we see it drifting toward enshittification.

Keep reading... Show less

The latest