Geopolitics

Trump, A 'Pragmatist' In Russian Eyes

Trump approaches take-off
Trump approaches take-off
Sergei Strokan and Maksim Yusin

WORLDCRUNCH NOTE TO READERS: This article was originally published in Kommersant on Nov. 10, two days after Donald Trump's election win. Since then, there have been reports that Russian computer hackers may have interfered in the U.S. election in Trump's favor. Also Trump had since called Taiwan's president, sparking a diplomatic row with China. Nevertheless, we believe the broader viewpoints of Russian experts of the shape of Trump's presidency is worth reading.

MOSCOW — The U.S. president-elect has not yet delved into the details of the many foreign policy dossiers, and we are still waiting to find out which of his campaign promises will be fulfilled. And it is telling that Donald Trump's first speech after winning the election was almost entirely devoted to issues of domestic policy. Still, even this address could be key to understanding how he will approach his international priorities. By repeating his resolve to make "America great again," Trump has left little doubt that he will be putting national interests first.

Still, the question of what Trump's election mean for Russia, and the world cannot be underestimated. A range of policy experts seem to agree that there is a very real prospect that Russia will no longer be seen as "Enemy No. 1," to be replaced by China, as was the case under the previous US administration.

Alexander Lomanov, chief researcher at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, told Kommersant that Beijing is preparing for the relationship with Washington to deteriorate under Donald Trump. Even during Barack Obama's time in office, when tensions with Moscow were more acute, Sino-American relations suffered as well from rising political tension, linked to the situation in the South China Sea, the need to protect Washington's Asian allies and democratic protests in Hong Kong. But with Trump, it could reach a whole different level. "Following the change of administration in the White House, there could be a real scenario where economic pressures lead to an all-out trade war with China. "A critical mass of aggravations could lead to a deterioration in U.S.-China relations," Lomanov explained.

Maksim Suchkov, of the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) says the ideological dimensions of international relations will be much less important to Trump than the economic ones. Moscow is betting on the change in administration in the White House bringing a "new system of national security priorities whereby Russia is not the main threat." For this to happen, Moscow must "find an entry point into the system being formed by Trump," Suchkov says.

Give and take

To achieve this goal, the Russian authorities must take reciprocal steps. "First of all, we must reduce the level of anti-American rhetoric and everyday anti-Americanism (among Russians), and convince Americans that cooperation with Russia is favorable for them," said Suchkov. "If the new U.S. administration will be more receptive to such signals from Moscow and will increasingly focus on finding new opportunities for America, the meaningful containment of China will become a much more urgent task for Donald Trump than confrontation with Russia."

Vladimir Sotnikov, director of "Russia-East-West" says Trump's tone on Moscow is a direct reversal from the outgoing administration. "Remember, who were listed as the main enemies of the United States according to Barack Obama? Russia, the "Islamic State" and Ebola," Sotnikov said. "President Trump is unlikely to stick to such an approach. He is a pragmatist, not an ideologue. He understands that Russia does not threaten the vital American interests. This means that the path is clear for a dialogue with Moscow and for possible geopolitical exchanges, on which the Democratic administration in the White House would never have agreed."

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Green

Ecological Angst In India, A Mining Dumpsite As Neighbor

Local villagers in western India have been forced to live with a mining waste site on the edge of town. What happens when you wake up one day and the giant mound of industrial waste has imploded?

The mining dumpsite is situated just outside of the Badi village in the coastal state of Gujarat

Sukanya Shantha

BADI — Last week, when the men and women from the Bharwad community in this small village in western India stepped out for their daily work to herd livestock, they were greeted with a strange sight.

The 20-meter-high small hill that had formed at the open-cast mining dumpsite had suddenly sunk. Unsure of the reason behind the sudden caving-in, they immediately informed other villagers. In no time, word had traveled far, even drawing the attention of environment specialists and activists from outside town.

This mining dumpsite situated less than 500 meters outside of the Badi village in the coastal state of Gujarat has been a matter of serious concern ever since the Gujarat Power Corporation Limited began lignite mining work here in early 2017. The power plant is run by the Power Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited, which was previously known as the Bhavnagar Energy Company Ltd.

Vasudev Gohil, a 43-year-old resident of Badi village says that though the dumping site is technically situated outside the village, locals must pass the area on a daily basis.


"We are constantly on tenterhooks and looking for danger signs," he says. Indeed, their state of alert is how the sudden change in the shape of the dumpsite was noticed in the first place.

Can you trust environmental officials?

For someone visiting the place for the first time, the changes may not stand out. "But we have lived all our lives here, we know every little detail of this village. And when a 150-meter-long stretch cave-in by over 25-30 feet, the change can't be overlooked," Gohil adds.

This is not the first time that the dumpsite has worried local residents. Last November, a large part of the flattened part of the dumpsite had developed deep cracks and several flat areas had suddenly got elevated. While the officials had attributed this significant elevation to the high pressure of water in the upper strata of soil in the region, environment experts had pointed to seismic activities. The change is evident even today, nearly a year since it happened.

It could have sunk because of the rain.

After the recent incident, when the villagers raised an alarm and sent a written complaint to the regional Gujarat Pollution Control Board, an official visit to the site was arranged, along with the district administration and the mining department.

The regional pollution board officer Bhavnagar, A.G. Oza, insists the changes "aren't worrisome" and attributes it to the weather.

"The area received heavy rain this time. It is possible that the soil could have sunk in because of the rain," he tells The Wire. The Board, he says, along with the mining department, is now trying to assess if the caving-in had any impact on the ground surface.

"We visited the site as soon as a complaint was made. Samples have already been sent to the laboratory and we will have a clear idea only once the reports are made available," Oza adds.

Women from the Surkha village have to travel several kilometers to find potable water

Sukanya Shantha/The Wire

A questionable claim

That the dumpsite had sunk in was noticeable for at least three days between October 1 and 3, but Rohit Prajapati of an environmental watchdog group Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, noted that it was not the first time.

"This is the third time in four years that something so strange is happening. It is a disaster in the making and the authorities ought to examine the root cause of the problem," Prajapati says, adding that the department has repeatedly failed to properly address the issue.

He also contests the GPCB's claim that excess rain could lead to something so drastic. "Then why was similar impact not seen on other dumping sites in the region? One cannot arrive at conclusions for geological changes without a deeper study of them," he says. "It can have deadly implications."

Living in pollution

The villagers have also accused the GPCB of overlooking their complaint of water pollution which has rendered a large part of the land, most importantly, the gauchar or grazing land, useless.

"In the absence of a wall or a barrier, the pollutant has freely mixed with the water bodies here and has slowly started polluting both our soil and water," complains 23- year-old Nikul Kantharia.

He says ever since the mining project took off in the region, he, like most other villagers has been forced to take his livestock farther away to graze. "Nothing grows on the grazing land anymore and the grass closer to the dumpsite makes our cattle ill," Kantharia claims.

The mining work should have been stopped long ago

Prajapati and Bharat Jambucha, a well-known environmental activist and proponent of organic farming from the region, both point to blatant violations of environmental laws in the execution of mining work, with at least 12 violations cited by local officials. "But nothing happened after that. Mining work has continued without any hassles," Jambucha says. Among some glaring violations include the absence of a boundary wall around the dumping site and proper disposal of mining effluents.

The mining work has also continued without a most basic requirement – effluent treatment plant and sewage treatment plant at the mining site, Prajapati points out. "The mining work should have been stopped long ago. And the company should have been levied a heavy fine. But no such thing happened," he adds.

In some villages, the groundwater level has depleted over the past few years and villagers attribute it to the mining project. Women from Surkha village travel several kilometers outside for potable water. "This is new. Until five years ago, we had some water in the village and did not have to lug water every day," says Shilaben Kantharia.

The mine has affected the landscape around the villages

Sukanya Shantha/The Wire

Resisting lignite mining

The lignite mining project has a long history of resistance. Agricultural land, along with grazing land were acquired from the cluster of 12 adjoining villages in the coastal Ghogha taluka between 1994 and 1997. The locals estimate that villagers here lost anything between 40-100% of their land to the project. "We were paid a standard Rs 40,000 per bigha," Narendra, a local photographer, says.

The money, Narendra says, felt decent in 1994 but for those who had been dependent on this land, the years to come proved very challenging. "Several villagers have now taken a small patch of land in the neighboring villages on lease and are cultivating cotton and groundnut there," Narendra says.

They were dependent on others' land for work.

Bharat Jambucha says things get further complicated for the communities which were historically landless. "Most families belonging to the Dalit or other marginalized populations in the region never owned any land. They were dependent on others' land for work. Once villagers lost their land to the project, the landless were pushed out of the village," he adds. His organization, Prakrutik Kheti Juth, has been at the forefront, fighting for the rights of the villages affected in the lignite mining project.

In 2017, when the mining project finally took off, villagers from across 12 villages protested. The demonstration was disrupted after police used force and beat many protesters. More than 350 of them were booked for rioting.

The villagers, however, did not give up. Protests and hunger strikes have continued from time to time. A few villagers even sent a letter to the President of India threatening that they would commit suicide if the government did not return their land.

"We let them have our land for over 20 years," says Gohil.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ