Protests in Venezuela
Protests in Venezuela
Juan Carlos Hidalgo

-OpEd-

CARACAS The Venezuelan regime has established, slowly but surely, a full-blown dictatorship. How did we get here?

In 2005, the opposition boycotted parliamentary elections to protest bias by the National Electoral Council (CNE). This withdrawal gave the government total control of parliament for five years. The opposition only decided to return to the electoral fray when opinion polls suggested it could win against supporters of then President Hugo Chávez.

When the popularity of the Bolivarian administration began to dive due to a worsening economy, the regime began to disqualify candidates, jail opponents, blackmail voters, manipulate electoral rolls, cancel scheduled elections and engage in massive voter fraud. Even when it accepted election defeat for certain state governorships, and in the legislative elections of 2015, the government deprived the institutions, lost to opponents, of any significant power or resources.

In 2013, Nicolás Maduro was elected president in contested polls that may have involved fraud despite a stamp of approval from the CNE. The opposition still saw elections as the only way out of the national impasse. When it won an absolute majority of seats in parliament in 2015, a Supreme Court loyal to the government systematically began to strip parliament of its powers and, effectively, make it irrelevant.

We should not be surprised that, in spite of enjoying the backing of most Venezuelans, opposition parties are unable to unify against the regime.

Last year, the opposition sought to implement a mechanism for calling a referendum to cut short Maduro's grip on power. Opinion polls indicated that such a vote would have easily gone in their favor. Unsurprisingly, the CNE arbitrarily suspended the process, leaving the opposition with no option except civil resistance.

The vote on Sunday, Aug. 6, to elect members of the National Constituent Assembly is yet another example of the CNE's rampant corruption. Its officials say that 8.1 million people voted that day. Independent news agency Reuters reported that at 5:30 pm — just two hours before polling stations closed — only 3.7 million had cast their ballot. The IT company that installed the voting machines later said the regime had manipulated vote numbers by "at least" one million. The head of CNE, Tibisay Lucena, is one of 13 senior Venezuelan officials who was recently slapped with U.S. sanctions.

President Maduro casting his vote during the election for the National Constituent Assembly Photo: Venezuela's Presidency/Xinhua/ZUMA

In recent days, Henry Ramos Allup, a former parliamentary Speaker and head of the opposition Democratic Action Party, made a disconcerting declaration. His party, he said, would run in state governor elections scheduled for December. Other figures in the opposition coalition Table of Democratic Unity (known by the acronym MUD in Spanish), are also considering taking part. The legislator Diosdado Cabello, considered the second most powerful figure in the regime, rightly mocked Allup for accepting to run in CNE-organized elections, which the opposition already anticipates will involve massive fraud.

Such internal division is a problem for the opposition. While some leaders insist on the regime's immediate expulsion through civil resistance, others are prepared to reach a compromise in exchange for flawed regional elections. We should not be surprised that, in spite of enjoying the backing of most Venezuelans, opposition parties are unable to unify against the regime.

One is reminded of a quote, which some attribute to Albert Einstein: "Insanity is repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results." That certainly describes certain elements of the Venezuelan opposition.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Coronavirus

Why U.S. Vaccine Diplomacy In Latin America Makes "Good" Sense

Echoing its cultural diplomacy of the early 20th century, the United States is gifting vaccines to Latin America as part of a renewed "good neighbor'' policy.

Waiting to get the vaccine in Nezahualcoyotl, Mexico

Andrea Matallana

-Analysis-

BUENOS AIRES — Just before and during World War II, the United States' Good Neighbor policy proved a very effective strategy to improve ties with Latin America. Initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the policy's main goal was non-interference and non-intervention. The U.S. would instead focus on reciprocal exchanges with their southern neighbors, including through art and cultural diplomacy.

Keep reading... Show less
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ