When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Israel

Israeli Hostages, Gag Orders And Social Media

The abduction of three young Israelis unfolded across the Internet, even as newspapers in Israel were barred from reporting it. What does social media mean for both democracy and security?

Gag orders vs. the digital age.
Gag orders vs. the digital age.
Yossi Gurvitz

TEL AVIV — First, some basic facts. We have absolutely no idea what happened Thursday night. All we know is that Friday morning the Israeli police rushed to issue a gag order about the possible news of an abduction of three young Israelis, after an avalanche of rumors spread on social networks and the WhatsApp mobile application.

Israeli media outlets were forced not to report on the case, even though everybody in the country knew something was going on. Therefore, the human brain — which cannot tolerate a state of emptiness — started to fill in the blanks, leading to an even more massive number of rumors.

The most incredible rumor was that the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) had successfully rescued the three boys in a heroic operation in an Arab village in the West Bank, killing five armed men and wounding two others.

This rumor went all the way to the WhatsApp list of military correspondents at major news outlets, accompanied by a message saying the official announcement by the Israeli military would soon follow. In the meantime, the IDF spokesman kept saying “No comment” as loud and clearly as he could.

Online boomerang

This kind of unraveling mess, which put the entire country in a complete frenzy, had not been seen since the vast gag order during the 2002 battle of Jenin. But today it shows how completely pointless it is to restrict information in our hyperconnected world.

Palestinian media outlets, meanwhile, reported Friday morning that a large number of Israeli military forces were conducting vast searches in the Hebron area for three abducted Israelis. They even published photos, which only surfaced in Israel a good 24 hours later. The photos were found by the Palestinians on Facebook posts of the worried families.

So if the objective of the gag order was to prevent the information from getting out to the Palestinians, it failed miserably. Besides, a Palestinian can just stick his head out of the window to see that something unusual is going on, and look it up on the Internet and get the whole picture in a matter of minutes.

On Friday, a new Facebook group appeared where people uploaded photos of themselves with a sign reading “Bring Back Our Boys.” It was an attempt to make a link to the abduction of the girls in Nigeria and the subsequent “Bring Back our Girls” campaign across social media outlets. In response, pro-Palestinian Internet users took the opportunity and published in a Facebook group photos of young Palestinian prisoners held in Israel.

The conclusion we must draw then is that gag orders simply cannot exist anymore in the digital age. But it also raises another question — when you realize that the gag order was not meant for Palestinians, but was really directed at the Israeli people: Was it in fact an attempt to cover up a huge mistake?

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Drones, Tablets, Cigarettes: How Ukraine's Reconnaissance Warriors Pinpoint The Enemy

Near the embattled city of Vuhledar, Ukrainian artillery reconnaissance units detect enemy positions. They work with drones, tablets and satellite internet — and they are often the last line of defense from a Russian onslaught.

Image of a soldier from the 56th Mariupol Motorized Brigade looking straight into  his DJI Matrice 300 RTK quad copter.

A soldier from the 56th Mariupol Motorized Brigade showing a DJI Matrice 300 RTK quad copter.

Anatolii Schara

VUHLEDAR — It's early in the morning, just before dawn. The artillery reconnaissance units are in Kurakhove, a city in Donetsk oblast, to pick up the equipment supplies that have just arrived from Kyiv: drones, tablets, portable solar power generators and Internet hardware for connection to the Starlink satellite system.

Because of the tremendous strain on the equipment, it needs to be constantly replaced. Everything is loaded into all-terrain vehicles, then they head toward the fiercely contested city of Vuhledar, in southeastern Ukraine, 60 kilometers from Donetsk.

"The task of artillery reconnaissance is to locate and fix enemy targets and to conduct artillery observation," explains commander Zeus, who only gives his combat name, in line with the policy of the Ukrainian army.

Artillery fire is mainly indirect. The target is not visible from the gun, which is usually located four to ten kilometers from the front line.

On the car radio, the music ends, the presenter announces in a solemn voice that Ukrainian troops are retreating in panic from Vuhledar. The men are unimpressed; they know that only Russian stations work in the frontline area.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest