When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The Modi-Trudeau Clash, Lessons From How Erdogan And MBS Handled The West

The diplomatic showdown between India and Canada continues to worsen, the latest sign of the rising power of former mid-level nations that increasingly are asserting themselves in the face of Western dominance.

photo of five men walking away

Modi had his say

Naveen Sharma/SOPA Images via ZUMA
Pierre Haski


PARIS — Expulsions of diplomats between rival countries is nothing new. In the weeks following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, dozens were deported between the two countries. But between friendly countries, it is much rarer, and internationally frowned upon. India’s decision Tuesday to demand the departure of 41 Canadian diplomats is therefore exceptional, and says a lot about today’s international political climate.

With this mass expulsion, New Delhi is expressing anger at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has directly implicated the Indian government in the assassination of a Sikh opposition figure on Canadian soil. The dissident, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, was shot dead in Surrey, British Columbia on June 18, and Ottawa has signaled that it is in possession of serious evidence, including wiretaps, implicating Indian agents in the assassination.

Ever since Trudeau launched his accusations, the tone has continued to escalate. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi denies the allegations, and counter-attacked by criticizing Canada’s asylum policy for those he calls “terrorists of Khalistan,” the name of the hypothetical Sikh state that many followers of the religion dream of. Modi wants Canada to pay the price for the attack on his honor.

A global shift in power

This affair reveals two phenomena. First, it reveals the assertion of identity and increasing international relevance of emerging countries led by illiberal and even authoritarian strongmen, such as Modi in India.

India has recently forged closer ties with the West, seen by the Indian Prime Minister’s trips to Washington and Paris this year. India, however, will not stand for criticism and “lessons” from its Western friends.

The second phenomenon is the questioning of the very principle of the right to asylum. Modi is challenging Canada’s right to accept Sikh exiles, in a similar way that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan blackmailed Sweden into handing over Kurdish exiles in exchange for his approval for the Nordic country’s admission into NATO. To this day, the issue has not been resolved between two theoretically allied countries.

photo of trudeau and modi shaking hands

Trudeau and Modi in happier times at last year's G7 in Germany

Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press via ZUMA

MBS and Khashoggi 

What is new is that these former middle-level powers have acquired the necessary clout and autonomy to make their voices heard and even win these political battles with leading Western nations.

The Crown Prince has enjoyed nearly complete impunity

When exiled Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered inside his own country’s consulate in Istanbul, investigations led directly to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman as the key perpetrator. Five years later, the Crown Prince remains one of the most powerful men on earth, and has enjoyed nearly complete impunity. All attempts to ostracize him for the murder, including by U.S. President Joe Biden, have failed.

Justin Trudeau now finds himself trapped, perhaps by his own naivety, for underestimating the shift in the world’s balance of power. Notably, not a single other Western leader has commented on the confrontation between the emerging Indian power and the Western prime minister calling for the rule of law. The rules of the game have certainly changed.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Look At This Crap! The "Enshittification" Theory Of Why The Internet Is Broken

The term was coined by journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the fatal drift of major Internet platforms: if they were ever useful and user-friendly, they will inevitably end up being odious.

A photo of hands holding onto a smartphone

A person holding their smartphone

Gilles Lambert/ZUMA
Manuel Ligero


The universe tends toward chaos. Ultimately, everything degenerates. These immutable laws are even more true of the Internet.

In the case of media platforms, everything you once thought was a good service will, sooner or later, disgust you. This trend has been given a name: enshittification. The term was coined by Canadian blogger and journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the inevitable drift of technological giants toward... well.

The explanation is in line with the most basic tenets of Marxism. All digital companies have investors (essentially the bourgeoisie, people who don't perform any work and take the lion's share of the profits), and these investors want to see the percentage of their gains grow year after year. This pushes companies to make decisions that affect the service they provide to their customers. Although they don't do it unwillingly, quite the opposite.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Annoying customers is just another part of the business plan. Look at Netflix, for example. The streaming giant has long been riddling how to monetize shared Netflix accounts. Option 1: adding a premium option to its regular price. Next, it asked for verification through text messages. After that, it considered raising the total subscription price. It also mulled adding advertising to the mix, and so on. These endless maneuvers irritated its audience, even as the company has been unable to decide which way it wants to go. So, slowly but surely, we see it drifting toward enshittification.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest