When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Profanity And Diplomacy, Translating Trump's 'Shithole Countries' Insult

Alidad Vassigh and Roy Greenburgh


By the end of Donald J. Trump's presidency, people will wonder: Was there anything he did not say? Any line he did not cross? As a lifelong businessman, he has declared war early and often on diplomatic niceties, proud to speak "like the people." The problem is that he is a person who speaks a lot like, how do you say … an asshole? A racist? Can you put that in print??

The Washington Postreported on a Thursday meeting with legislators where Trump demanded immigration limits on people coming from "shithole countries," after lawmakers had cited efforts to help those from Haiti, El Salvador and African states. (Trump tweeted a half-hearted denial early Friday that he used the "S" word that few will believe ...)

The outrage at his remark across U.S. media confirms that it was really just another day of talking out loud for President Trump. The offensive word chimes with his decision to throw out thousands of Salvadoran migrants, and earlier moves to ban entry of people from "terrorist" states in the Middle East, or even his calling global warming an enormous Chinese scam. He doesn't like foreigners, we get it. His stated preference on Thursday for immigrants "from Norway," confirms that he likes them rich and white.

El Diario De Hoy

The extra-salty language, and potential diplomatic fallout, posed a challenge to editors (and translators) around the world. The website Quartz observed that Asian news outlets struggled with how to translate the offending word, noting that countries "that suck," as one website wrote, is not inaccurate. Taiwan's Central News Agency went for the poetic "countries where birds don't lay eggs," while Japanese daily Sankei opted for the more prosaic "countries that are dirty like toilets." According to AFP, Chinese media shied away from a direct translation, following the lead of the People's Daily by using languo, meaning "bad countries." The French-language edition of ever-so-polite Radio Canada also avoided using profanity, choosing trou à rats ("rathole") — even if the English-language CBC went verbatim.

Iranian news service ISNA reported on Trump's "insulting" language, which it translated as chaah-e mostara, or "toilet hole."

Most Spanish-language publications translated the insult as paises de mierda, ("shit countries') a term that is commonly used by people complaining about their own country. In Italy, similarly, La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera chose cesso di Paesi ("toilet countries') and paesi di merda ("shit countries') respectively. In Colombia, the website of the Caracol broadcaster went literal with its agujeros de mierda, the same route as specifically offended national website ElSalvador.com, which also included the original English term that Trump used.

NY Daily News

The most colorful response from south of the border came from former Mexican President Vicente Fox, a frequent critic of the billionaire leader: ".@realDonaldTrump, your mouth is the foulest shithole in the world. With what authority do you proclaim who's welcome in America and who's not. America's greatness is built on diversity, or have you forgotten your immigrant background, Donald?"

The Washington Post noted that in the Thursday meeting with Congressional leaders about an immigration reform deal, Trump made a point of singling out Haiti a second time. "Why do we need more Haitians?" Trump said, according to people familiar with the meeting. "Take them out."

On Friday, on the French-speaking island nation, the newspapers were also busy looking for the perfect translation for the presidential profanity: There was the literal trou de merde in Loop Haiti, while Le Nouvelliste also used trou du cul, which means "asshole." Maybe there's some confusion? Or maybe Haitians, who have faced pointed American racism for decades, are warming up for their comeback. One way or another, Donald "America First" Trump should realize that the world can give as good as it gets.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The Unsustainable Future Of Fish Farming — On Vivid Display In Turkish Waters

Currently, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming, compared to just 10% two decades ago. The short-sightedness of this shift risks eliminating fishing output from both the farms and the open seas along Turkey's 5,200 miles of coastline.

Photograph of two fishermen throwing a net into the Tigris river in Turkey.

Traditional fishermen on the Tigris river, Turkey.

Dûrzan Cîrano/Wikimeidia
İrfan Donat

ISTANBUL — Turkey's annual fish production includes 515,000 tons from cultivation and 335,000 tons came from fishing in open waters. In other words, 60% of Turkey's fish currently comes from cultivation, also known as fish farming.

It's a radical shift from just 20 years ago when some 600,000 tons, or 90% of the total output, came from fishing. Now, researchers are warning the current system dominated by fish farming is ultimately unsustainable in the country with 8,333 kilometers (5,177 miles) long.

Professor Mustafa Sarı from the Maritime Studies Faculty of Bandırma 17 Eylül University believes urgent action is needed: “Why were we getting 600,000 tons of fish from the seas in the 2000’s and only 300,000 now? Where did the other 300,000 tons of fish go?”

Professor Sarı is challenging the argument from certain sectors of the industry that cultivation is the more sustainable approach. “Now we are feeding the fish that we cultivate at the farms with the fish that we catch from nature," he explained. "The fish types that we cultivate at the farms are sea bass, sea bram, trout and salmon, which are fed with artificial feed produced at fish-feed factories. All of these fish-feeds must have a significant amount of fish flour and fish oil in them.”

That fish flour and fish oil inevitably must come from the sea. "We have to get them from natural sources. We need to catch 5.7 kilogram of fish from the seas in order to cultivate a sea bream of 1 kg," Sarı said. "Therefore, we are feeding the fish to the fish. We cannot cultivate fish at the farms if the fish in nature becomes extinct. The natural fish need to be protected. The consequences would be severe if the current policy is continued.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest