When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
India

Why Sending A Female Android To Space Is A Problem

India's space program will use a female android named Vyommitra to test the crew module ahead of its first crewed flight. Why did the robot have to be female? And where are the real women astronauts?

Vyommitra the first female android to be sent in space
Vyommitra the first female android to be sent in space
Jahnavi Sen

NEW DELHI — At the end of 2020, a legless female android will be making her way to space. Vyommitra, which is Hindi for ‘space friend", will be flying aboard a crew module attached to a GSLV Mk III rocket in an unmanned mission to prepare for the Indian Space Research Organisation's (ISRO's) first human spaceflight mission, dubbed Gaganyaan.

According to the Indian Express, ISRO plans to use Vyommitra to test the crew module and make sure it's fit for astronauts, who will use it in 2022. "Attaining launch and orbital postures, responding to the environment, generating warnings, replacing carbon dioxide canisters, operating switches, monitoring of the crew module, receiving voice commands, responding via speech (bilingual) are the functions listed for the humanoid," the newspaper said.

To send an android – a robot built to look like a human – to space isn't extraordinary. In fact, other space agencies have undertaken such missions in the past. But what's striking is that Vyommitra is decidedly female; one headline even refers to the humanoid as the "first Indian woman to go to space" – although ‘she" is only being used to prepare for a mission that will be undertaken at first by men.

Vyommitra is a half-humanoid, her body ends at her torso. In photos of her available on the internet from ISRO's unveiling, she is dressed more like an air-hostess than an astronaut. She is seen wearing a white and grey suit in one avatar, and a blue silk shirt in the other. Nowhere does she appear in a spacesuit – which of course the (real) men she is making way for will have to wear while in space.

Why did Vyommitra have to be female? Perhaps the most charitable answer is that ISRO is being aspirational: that it really wants to send a woman to space and believes doing so with a legless robot could inspire others to head in the same direction.

If that were the case, ISRO should be taking active steps to recruit more women and include them on ultra-visible missions like Gaganyaan. It has stepped up at times in the past, notably by appointing Ritu Karidhal the deputy operations director of the Mars Orbiter Mission and the mission director of Chandrayan 2; M. Vanitha the project director of Chandrayaan 2; and V.R. Lalithambika as the head of the human spaceflight mission.

However, after the Chandrayaan 2 mission's lunar surface component failed on September 7, both Karidhal and Vanitha disappeared from public attention and none of ISRO's official communiqués included their names or quotes. Even now, what pitiably little information is publicly available of the Gaganyaan mission excludes Lalithambika's comments.

Vyommitra could find a wide range of female friends in the AI world, such Siri, Alexa and Cortana.

So with Vyommitra, ISRO is simply continuing its inexplicable tradition of sending mixed signals: celebrating women on ‘happy" occasions but sidelining them in controversial times, prudently cashing in on the hype when the going is good, and withdrawing into a shell and fronting The Man when the going gets tough.

Indeed, it appears that ISRO has fallen into an all-too-familiar trap with the half-android. Vyommitra could find a wide range of female friends in the AI world, such Siri, Alexa and Cortana – all women, or at least started out as such, though now users have an option to change these tech assistant's gender in a few cases.

Control room supervising Chandrayaan-2's Lander Vikram in Bangalore, India — Photo: Kashif Masood/Xinhua/ZUMA

As multiple experts, and even the UN, have argued, even now, people assume that an assistant is a woman. They lurk in the background, keeping track of all the "little things' you need in your day, without advancing sophisticated opinions. They're even subject to verbal abuse and don't give it back. Technology developers in particular have played into these stereotypical gender roles instead of trying to subvert or change them.

The feminist academic Helen Hester found that when such assistants were given a male voice, people assumed they were "a research assistant, an academic librarian and an information manager, rather than … a personal secretary." Even in movies, Amy C. Chambers wrote in The Conversation, the gender of a digital assistant influenced perceptions of the assistant's personality and what it could be used for.

Technology companies have said in the past that they stick to using women's voices in these roles because people find them more "agreeable". But all that does is reinforce outdated, regressive and patriarchal notions about where a woman fits in society. "The world needs to pay much closer attention to how, when and whether AI technologies are gendered and, crucially, who is gendering them," UNESCO's director Saniye Guler Corat said.

Vyommitra goes one step further than digital assistants. She has not only a woman's voice but also a woman's body. And she will go where no Indian woman has gone before… only to make sure that Indian men have a safer and more comfortable time up there. If ISRO wants to prove that it really did have good intentions, it needs to give one of the many real qualified women the same opportunity.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest