When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Collateral Tech Damage Of Hamas Attack: The Final Demise Of Twitter

Elon Musk has been criticized before for his management of Twitter, now known as X. But it was not until Saturday that the social network revealed just how inept and dangerous it had become, as fake news spread far and wide. It may never recover.

An image of t​he X logo labelled as 'Fake News', photoshopped over a photo of Gaza being bombed.

The X logo labelled as 'Fake News', over a photo of Gaza being bombed.

Riccardo Luna


No, Twitter didn't end on July 24, 2023 — that's when Elon Musk, seemingly out of the blue, decided it would be called X.

Twitter, as we'd come to know it and appreciate its usefulness, died on the morning of October 7, following the surprise terror attack by Hamas and the Israeli response. The platform's deeper transformation of the past months was revealed to us that day, in all its ugliness: Rather than a natural evolution, Twitter has experienced a ghastly genetic mutation.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

X has failed to live up to Musk's old dream of a single app that does everything for everyone. But X has also become something far from the once-loved social network that invented microblogging in 2006, helping users share their insights into the world in 140 characters.

The little blue bird today is an unrecognizable beast. It's like a public intersection without traffic light and signs, and chances are you've also heard the sound of the crashes on your timeline.

Lifeline of the masses

Sure, nothing lasts forever. Things change, and sometimes they die. Twitter seems to have hit a dead end, and that's a pity. Because if it's indeed game over, it will mean that we've lost something important.

Whether it was war, a popular uprising or an earthquake, there was a place you could turn to if you wanted immediate information. Where you could feel the heartbeat of the world in real time. That place could never be the television or newspaper — it could only be Twitter.

You felt like you were somehow lending a hand to a good cause.

Thousands of ordinary people would post updates on any crisis anywhere in the world – text, photos, videos – before any journalist could reach the scene. You could participate in the discussion, share a tweet to amplify its audience, and you felt like you were somehow lending a hand to a good cause.

The illusion that a retweet was enough to help bring down a distant regime may have fooled many armchair revolutionaries, but it cannot be denied that Twitter was a lifeline for people on the ground who tried to change the world at the cost of their lives.

Without it, perhaps there would have been no Arab Spring, immortalized through the tweeted pictures of the protests in Egypt's Tahrir Square, nor the unsuccessful Iranian revolution in 2009, or even the successful one in Ukraine in 2014. Twitter was the weapon of the masses.

Then came Musk

Then, about a year ago, Elon Musk came onto the scene. Twitter's name change appears benign compared to the other shifts he brought about, dismantling the team that moderated content, removed violent or blatantly false tweets, and partly replacing it with "community notes," a token form of self-management.

Meanwhile, certified users, those you could trust 100%, the ones with the famous blue checkmark, are no longer truly authoritative. Anyone can have it for $8 per month. Want to spread lies or wild opinions and be rewarded by X's algorithm, seen by millions of people? Pay for the blue checkmark.

The gruesome outcome of Musk's style of management has played out before us in the aftermath of the Gaza crisis: in the hours immediately following Hamas's attack and Israel's counterattack, scenes from video games were passed off as real images; a fireworks party in Algeria was misrepresented as a bombing; a video of the war in Syria from three years ago was presented as if it had just been shot in Gaza; another of an Israeli general captured by Hamas was viewed almost two million times - except it was actually an Azerbaijani separatist; and a supposed photo of Cristiano Ronaldo with the Palestinian flag — actually a Moroccan soccer player at the 2022 World Cup — went viral.

Photograph of Elon Musk walking through journalists

September 13, Washington: Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and owner of X, arrives for the Inaugural AI Insight Forum on Capitol Hill

Tom Williams/ZUMA

Platform security

In the first two days of the conflict, X was overwhelmed by disinformation to the point that on Monday, CEO Linda Laccarino canceled all public engagements to deal with "platform security," while the tiny content moderation team issued a statement saying that they were doing their best. For instance, they suspended the fake Jerusalem Post profile that had claimed Netanyahu was in the hospital.

It now seems impossible to stop

Too little, too late. Let's be clear: it's not as if Twitter was ever free from disinformation. But by now it seems almost impossible to stop because the algorithm promotes those who pay over those who are credible.

Musk himself falls among the blatantly non-credible. On Sunday, soon after the conflict erupted, he invited everyone to follow exactly two accounts — both well-known for spreading disinformation. That message was later deleted, but not before it raked in 11 million views.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Putin's "Pig-Like" Latvia Threat Is A Chilling Reminder Of What's At Stake In Ukraine

In the Ukraine war, Russia's military spending is as high as ever. Now the West is alarmed because the Kremlin leader is indirectly hinting at a possible attack on Latvia, a NATO member. It is a reminder of a growing danger to Europe.

Photo of Russian President Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin

Pavel Lokshin


BERLIN — Russian President Vladimir Putin sometimes chooses downright bizarre occasions to launch his threats against the West. It was at Monday's meeting of the Russian Human Rights Council, where Putin expressed a new, deep concern. It was not of course about the human rights of the thousands of political prisoners in his own country, but about the Russian population living in neighboring Latvia, which happens to be a NATO member, having to take language tests.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest