eyes on the U.S.

Only Angela Merkel Can Stop The Liberal West From Imploding

Angie on her way
Angie on her way
Alan Posener

-OpEd-

BERLIN — It's been said that house guests are like dead fish: After three days they start to smell. When it comes to government officials, it usually takes a little longer. Americans make a president clear out of the White House after eight years, at the latest. That's smart.

Heads of government in Germany can stay on for much longer. But most of the time, they're long past their political expiration date before the end of their term in office. Angela Merkel, who has served 11 years as chancellor, was already out of luck by the time she reached her eighth year at the helm of Germany. And yet, she remains the only reasonable choice for the job. No one else can prevent the West from imploding.

There will soon be a president in the White House who sums up his guiding principle as "Americanism, not globalism!" The way U.S. President-elect Donald Trump reads geopolitics, free trade is a conspiracy against the American job market and NATO is an alliance that makes the U.S. spend too much on defense. He considers confrontation the norm and weakness the only sin.

Trump has said Merkel is ruining Germany because she lets in too many refugees. For Trump, the European Union is the embodiment of the "globalization" that he's fighting. He thinks that Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party, who advocated for Britain's departure from the union, is the true leader of Britons. Trump's chief advisor Stephen Bannon admires European nationalists such as France's Marine Le Pen, Dutch politician Geert Wilders and, like Trump, admires Russian President Vladimir Putin.

In a situation like this, Europe needs leadership that prioritizes the West's solidarity above all else. If Britain had decided to stay in the EU, former British prime minister David Cameron would have been the most natural candidate for the job. But we have Theresa May, the current prime minister, who is busy drawing up a blueprint for Great Britain's self-imposed isolation.

France, a nuclear power, is about to elect a president, who in the worst-case scenario would be Le Pen, a politician who wants France to abandon the euro and maybe the EU — a decision that would fundamentally alter transnational projects.

Even if France doesn't elect Le Pen, the next president will be confronted with the difficult task of loosening regulations in France, a job that former presidents in past decades have found to be the hardest nut to crack. This struggle could supply right-wing extremists with new power. Consequently, France will not be able to lead Europe.

Can the three heads of the EU — the presidents of the EU Parliament, the European Council and the European Commission — lead Europe? Not likely, as their power is only borrowed. Martin Schulz, a German politician who is president of the EU Parliament, would like to be German chancellor. But keep in mind that no active and powerful German politician voluntarily leaves for Brussels. Under Merkel, only heads of government lead Europe, if at all, and only those backed by the powerful can prevail. In Europe, only Merkel has that power.

Obviously, Merkel doesn't have that power by virtue of her personality. Rather, Germany's economic power translates to her political heft in Europe. Merkel was able to push a rescue policy for Greece because Germany bore the risk as the main creditor. Her plan to distribute refugees was ineffective because she lacked such leverage. Her deal with Turkey passed only because European countries expected some relief from the migrant crisis.

Merkel has even when, and especially when, she was in power, not behaved in the smartest manner. Her insistence on fiscal austerity forced the European Central Bank to take countermeasures that have been the wind in the sails of eurosceptics worldwide.

Merkel has the power and, even if you take that away from her, there is no one with her authority and experience. Really nobody. Maybe Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi? A lightweight. And no, no one in Europe can save the union's cohesion. You can regret that, but you have to accept it.

Merkel has to do the job

In a way, we have to be thankful that Merkel is a woman free of any noticeable principles and who doesn't feel bound to yesterday's chatter. In order to hold together the EU and to lessen political riots, it'll be necessary to focus on things that might not be good or popular for Germany from an economic point of view. Think euro bonds, big European infrastructure projects, fiscal stimulus measures and improving the mobility of future employees.

These policies are necessary to raise the attractiveness of membership to the EU. Britain's exit from the union will have to pass as smoothly as possible. We must resist the temptation to punish the country. We'll have to open the European market to Britain. A unified EU is vital to negotiating a new world economic order with the U.S. and China. Trump threatens to penalize unfair trade partners with punitive tariffs that will most likely hit China first. Eventually, they will strike Germany too.

A trade war between Washington and Peking would harm Germany. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is already dead. Free trade must be rescued. NATO must be prevented from falling apart. Trump's criticism of European partners is not totally unjustified. If the Republican sees NATO as just a "deal," Europe will have to convince him that NATO means good business for America. Above all, Europeans must spend more money and use it more wisely — "More bang for the buck," as former U.S. president Dwight D. Eisenhower put it.

These are the next tasks, and they require a best-case scenario, one where the EU survives and Trump does not turn his back on NATO. If the EU falls apart and Trump looks for a deal with Putin, the consequences are incalculable.

Here again, you don't want a newcomer as German chancellor. Who could do Merkel's job? Horst Seehofer, head of the Christian Social Union, seems overwhelmed by the state of Bavaria alone. Finance minister Wolfgang Schauble doesn't have what it takes. He couldn't fight long-time chancellor Helmut Kohl. He's not a leader. Defense minister Ursula von der Leyen is missing the patience. Christian Democrat Jens Spahn is alert and is often called the union's junior hope. But he's too busy making provocative statements. He's not a statesman.

No, Merkel has to do the job. She lacks a distinctive image and is therefore capable of working with anyone: the Social Democratic Party, the Greens, the Free Democratic Party and any combination of the three. Sometimes being gray is a virtue if the alternative wears the colors of the new nationalists.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

"The Truest Hypocrisy" - The Russia-NATO Clash Seen From Moscow

Russia has decided to cut off relations with the Western military alliance. But Moscow says it was NATO who really wanted the break based on its own internal rationale.

NATO chief Stoltenberg and Russian Foregin Minister Lavrov

Russian Foreign Ministry/TASS via ZUMA
Pavel Tarasenko and Sergei Strokan

MOSCOW — The Russian Foreign Ministry's announcement that the country's permanent representation to NATO would be shut down for an indefinite period is a major development. But from Moscow's viewpoint, there was little alternative.

These measures were taken in response to the decision of NATO on Oct. 6 to cut the number of personnel allowed in the Russian mission to the Western alliance by half. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the removal of accreditations was from eight employees of the Russian mission to NATO who were identified as undeclared employees of Russian intelligence." We have seen an increase in Russian malicious activity for some time now," Stoltenberg said.


The Russian Foreign Ministry called NATO's expulsion of Russian personnel a "ridiculous stunt," and Stoltenberg's words "the truest hypocrisy."

In announcing the complete shutdown in diplomacy between Moscow and NATO, the Russian Foreign Ministry added: "The 'Russian threat' is being hyped in strengthen the alliance's internal unity and create the appearance of its 'relevance' in modern geopolitical conditions."

The number of Russian diplomatic missions in Brussels has been reduced twice unilaterally by NATO in 2015 and 2018 - after the alliance's decision of April 1, 2014 to suspend all practical civilian and military cooperation between Russia and NATO in the wake of Russia's annexation of Crimea. Diplomats' access to the alliance headquarters and communications with its international secretariat was restricted, military contacts have frozen.

Yet the new closure of all diplomatic contacts is a perilous new low. Kommersant sources said that the changes will affect the military liaison mission of the North Atlantic alliance in Moscow, aimed at promoting the expansion of the dialogue between Russia and NATO. However, in recent years there has been no de facto cooperation. And now, as Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has announced, the activities of the military liaison mission will be suspended. The accreditation of its personnel will be canceled on November 1.

NATO told RIA Novosti news service on Monday that it regretted Moscow's move. Meanwhile, among Western countries, Germany was the first to respond. "It would complicate the already difficult situation in which we are now and prolong the "ice age," German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told reporters.

"Lavrov said on Monday, commenting on the present and future of relations between Moscow and the North Atlantic Alliance, "If this is the case, then we see no great need to continue pretending that any changes will be possible in the foreseeable future because NATO has already announced that such changes are impossible.

The suspension of activities of the Russian Permanent Mission to NATO, as well as the military liaison and information mission in Russia, means that Moscow and Brussels have decided to "draw a final line under the partnership relations of previous decades," explained Andrei Kortunov, director-general of the Russian Council on Foreign Affairs, "These relations began to form in the 1990s, opening channels for cooperation between the sides … but they have continued to steadily deteriorate over recent years."

Kortunov believes the current rupture was promoted by Brussels. "A new strategy for NATO is being prepared, which will be adopted at the next summit of the alliance, and the previous partnership with Russia does not fit into its concept anymore."

The existence and expansion of NATO after the end of the Cold War was the main reason for the destruction of the whole complex of relations between Russia and the West. Today, Russia is paying particular attention to marking red lines related to the further steps of Ukraine's integration into NATO. Vladimir Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov previously stated this, warning that in response to the alliance's activity in the Ukrainian direction, Moscow would take "active steps" to ensure its security.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ