When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Germany

Love It Or Hate It, Amazon May Be Impossible To Live Without

Amazon is upending the commercial status quo. And yet, as much as people like to complain about it, the temptation to use it can be irresistible.

An Amazon warehouse in Pforzheim, Germany
An Amazon warehouse in Pforzheim, Germany
Kurt Kister

-Analysis-

MUNICH — The stock market isn't just an indicator of economic success and power relations. It also tells us much about the current state of society, and about the unprecedented impact of the internet in particular.

The five biggest companies in the world are Apple, Amazon, Alphabet (Google's parent company), Microsoft and Facebook. All of them — except for Facebook — have either passed or are nearing the $1 trillion threshold. Those Big Five could not exist without the internet, and without them, the internet would be very different from what it is today.

Indeed, there is no event, evolution or process in the history of humanity that has changed and influenced the entire world and the individual lives of billions of people the way the internet has in just two decades. Even the scientific and technological revolution in the 18th century — which brought mechanics, electricity, mass production, new means of transport — took much longer than this new, modern revolution.

With the internet, the world has gone through a complete transformation. More and more people live, love, hate and work with and through the web. Politics, working life, travel and communication have all been transformed, to the point that they're nothing like they were in 1998. If a person of the 11th century ended up in the 15th, they could adapt, given a bit of time. But if someone fell through a time-fold from 1850 to 2018, they would end up in an incomprehensible world.

The great shopping shift

Amazon is one of those phenomena that define the beginning of the digital age. We no longer buy from local stores. Instead we purchase what we need from our smartphones and computers. For online purchases that aren't data streams (films, series, music, electronic books), delivery still consists of a mix of modern methods and older technology — poorly paid messengers bring the assembled product from poorly paid packaging workers. But this too will likely change in the near future through automated logistics and delivery systems controlled, in large part, by what we call artificial intelligence.

Either way, about one-third of online commerce in Germany is already dominated by Amazon. It is possible that physical stores and online shopping will exist side by side for quite some time. From a practical standpoint, however, we will need fewer and fewer stores in certain locations. Shops will survive where they can convey an experience — speaking to a person instead of a robot, strolling through actual aisles instead of scrolling.

Visiting a shopping street is a social experience. This is similar to the gradual switch to music streaming, as opposed to listening to music on old-fashioned stereos. Amazon does both: It sells vinyl records and CDs, but also offers streamed music at a fraction of the cost. Little wonder that Amazon has also opened bookstores here and there. Proper bookstores, with shelves!

Amazon Books store near Portland — Photo: Steve Morgan

In a sense, an Amazon bookstore is sort of a re-enactment club for history buffs. It's like those people who dress up in period uniforms and pretend they're back in the U.S. Civil War. The re-enactor believes he is experiencing something that used to be normal. Anyone entering an Amazon bookstore is, in that sense, a re-enactor of the what used to be normal, what used to be the present. Anyone entering an Amazon bookstore is a re-enactor of the 20th century.

Putting the cart before the horse

Amazon exemplifies another inverse evolution, one in which trade precedes manufacturing. For centuries it was the other way around: People made things, and later, if they had a surplus and wanted other things, they would sell their goods or barter. Amazon is different: It put trade first. But then, after being wildly successful on that front, the company realized it could further promote trade through its own production. As a result, there are now plenty of things — ranging from films to food to textiles — that Amazon now produces in-house.

Who has never bought from Amazon?

Incidentally, the same principle prevails in another area that Amazon is cultivating: publishing. Almost anyone can publish a book on Amazon. You don't need to work with agents anymore, or arrogant editors, or publishers and bookstores — because Amazon is all that. If the writing sells, it is fine. If not, well at least the self-publishing author can take comfort in the fact that Franz Kafka didn't sell many books either.

Yes, for people who grew up in the 20th century, the dominance of these digital companies is unsettling. And yet, who except avid watchers of Bibel TV (Bible Television) doesn't have a cell phone and use the internet? Who still uses a film camera? Who has never bought from Amazon?

Amazon destroys bookstores. And because I think bookstores are more important than grocery stores, I try not to buy things through Amazon. But then I wanted the fourth season of a particular series. I also wanted the collected works of the explorer and adventurer Sir Richard F. Burton, something I'd have to pay a fortune for in an actual bookstore, provided I could even find it. On Amazon, the 18,350 pages of all of Burton's works cost 99 cents. You load them on the Kindle electronic reading device designed by Amazon and then you can always have them with you.

Thus, bookstores are disappearing. Amazon is worth a trillion dollars. And I'm stuck with a guilty conscience, though I do, at least, have Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Madinah & Meccah on my e-reader.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

The Dam Attack Adds To Ukraine's Huge Environmental Toll, Already Estimated At $54 Billion

The blowing up of the Nova Kakhovka dam has unleashed massive flooding in southern Ukraine. The damage is sure to be staggering, which will add to already massive the toll estimated in March.

Photo of a burnt forest in Kharkiv

Local men dismantle the remains of destroyed Russian military equipment for scrap metal in a burned forest in Kharkiv

Anna Akage

-This article was updated on June 6, 2023 at 2 p.m. local time-

The blowing up of a large Soviet-era dam on the Dnipro river, which has sparked massive flooding, may turn out to be the most environmentally damaging of the Ukraine war.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has blamed Russia for the attack on the Nova Kakhovka dam, calling it "ecocide," with the flooding already estimated to affect over 16,000 people in surrounding villages, many of whom have been told to evacuate immediately. So far, eight villages have been flooded completely by water from the dam's reservoirs.

Moscow, meanwhile, says Kyiv is behind the blast in occupied areas of Ukraine. But even before knowing who is to blame, environmental experts note that is just the latest ecological casualty in the 15-month-long conflict.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

In March, for the first time, there was an estimate of the cost of the environmental damage of the war on Ukraine: $54 billion.

Ruslan Strilets, Ukraine’s Minister of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, explained that experts have applied a new methodology based on environmental inspection to tally the cost.

“This includes land, air, and water pollution, burned-down forests, and destroyed natural resources,” he said. “Our main goal is to show these figures to everyone so that they can be seen in Europe and the world so that everyone understands the price of this environmental damage and how to restore it to Ukraine.”

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest