When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Sources

In Mexico, Making Solidarity Last Beyond The Quake

In Mexico City on Sept. 22
In Mexico City on Sept. 22
Sylvia Colombo

-OpEd-

In his account of the 1985 earthquake, which killed between 6,000 and 30,000 people (there are no precise figures) and destroyed more than 800 buildings in Mexico City, Carlos Monsiváis, one of the country's greatest writers, described what he saw as the "emergence of civil society."

At the time, Monsiváis, who died in 2010, witnessed the discredit of an unpopular government, led by then-President Miguel de la Madrid, of Mexico's Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). He recounted how, while the government was slow to react and distorted the death toll and the tragedy's extent, civilians embraced the responsibility of helping the victims and supporting the disoriented rescue workers.

In his book No Sin Nosotros. Los Dias del Terremoto, 1985-2005Not Without Us: The Days of the Earthquake, he wrote that "the whole of society across Mexico City organized itself with speed and skill, and with a core that stretched across upper and lower classes. Throughout two weeks, roughly one million people scrambled to create shelters, to supply food and clothes, to collect funds, to locate missing people, to retrieve the remains of the deceased and to rescue the survivors trapped in the rubble, to organize transport, to provide psychological counseling, to work to prevent health epidemics, to remove the mounds of gravel, and to demolish the ruins that posed hazards."

For Monsiváis, the volunteers of 1985 realized a concept of civil society that had been "abstract" until then in Mexico.

In an interview about the earthquake that hit the southern part of the country on September 7, Jean François Prud'homme, political scientist and general academic coordinator at El Colegio de México echoed what Monsiváis had witnessed. "What we saw in 1985 was a waking up of Mexican society to take the reins to overcome the catastrophe, as there was a collective awareness that the government was weak."

What is most remarkable in the streets of Mexico City is the solidarity.

After Tuesday's earthquake in Mexico City, Prud'homme said in a follow-up interview that it was happening again: "In 1985, just like now, what is most remarkable in the streets of Mexico City is the solidarity. Nobody appears afraid. The difference is that, 30 years ago, there was less information available about what to do. Now, there's a whole culture of prevention and reaction to earthquakes that makes volunteers more efficient. The experience and training have helped."

Reports from journalists on the ground and images on the news confirm this. Amid power cuts and dark traffic lights, people are seen with megaphones or shouting to direct the traffic, restaurants are opening their doors to offer water, food and electric outlets to let people charge their phone batteries and locate family and friends. Private hospitals are offering free care for the injured.

"It's early to evaluate the performance of President Enrique Peña Nieto, but at least he's going to the places that were hit and the public services are out there in the streets," Prud'homme says. Mexico is nine months away from a presidential election and Peña Nieto's PRI is not doing well in the polls.

A significant development since 1985 is that solidarity can now rely on another tool, the Internet. Government and civil society groups have been able to use social networks to issue warnings and security instructions and guide people on how to behave in hit areas.

The Mexicans are very familiar with most of the guidelines, such as "don't run," "exit buildings calmly," "stay away from power cables and towers," "open your WiFi to everybody," "don't use the phone unnecessarily to avoid overloading the lines," "avoid making noise near rubble, so distress calls can be heard."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Saudi Ambitions: Is MBS A New Nasser For The Middle East?

Mohammed bin Salman, aka MBS, is positioning the Saudi kingdom to be a global force of diplomacy in a way that challenges a longstanding alliance with Washington. But does the young prince have a singular vision for the interests of both his nation and the world?

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman sitting with hands crossed

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia on April 14, 2023

Piere Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — In the Lebanese daily L'Orient-le-Jour, which has no particular attachment to the Saudi government, Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom's Crown Prince, was recently described as a man "who is taking on an importance that no Arab leader has had since Nasser."

That's right: this is the very same Mohamed bin Salman who had been considered an international pariah for ordering the sordid murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018 at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

So what has "MBS," as he calls himself, done to be compared to the greatest Arab nationalist leader of the 20th century, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who died in 1970? The Crown Prince has taken advantage of the shockwaves of the war in Ukraine to emancipate himself from any oversight, and to develop a diplomacy which, it must be admitted, is hard to keep up with.

Saudi Arabia thus embodies those mid-level powers that defy all the codes of international alliances, and do as they please – for better or for worse.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest