PARIS â€" There are times when it is necessary to compare things that are not comparable. Thereâ€™s a chance at least that it will wake up some anesthetized minds.
Between 1933 and 1940, several million refugees who had escaped from Germany, Poland, the Baltic countries and elsewhere, fleeing Nazism, were met with closed borders. They had names like Nathan, Samuel or Rachel.
Nathan, for example, was prescient enough to flee Germany as early as the summer of 1933, five months after Adolf Hitler took power. He wanted to go to the United States, but couldnâ€™t obtain a visa. He tried Spain, and was rebuffed again. More by chance than anything else, he ended up in France, where he wasn't exactly welcome but not pushed away either.
Nathan survived the German occupation of France by joining the ranks of the resistance movement, in the Pyrenees, together with Spanish Republicans who survived the civil war. Nathan had ten brothers and sisters, all killed in the Nazi concentration camps, while his mother died of hunger in the Warsaw ghetto.
The six million who died in the Holocaust didnâ€™t arouse any great wave of emotion â€" Jewish people aside â€" until the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961. Before that, the extermination of the Jews had been assimilated in the collective unconscious as collateral damage of World War II. Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, who had been aware of their situation since 1933, had nonetheless always refused to allow the extermination not yet known as the Shoah to hijack their global strategy, the defeat of the Nazis and the alliance with Stalin.
Letâ€™s now talk about that thing which, supposedly, has nothing to do with what I just explained, namely the flight of millions of refugees from Syria, Iraq and Eritrea. Is it different because Latifa, Ali and Ahmed arenâ€™t slaughtered with the same industrial efficiency as Samuel, Nathan and Rachel? Why is it different? Are we to believe that Ali, Latifa and Ahmed risk ending up drowning in the Mediterranean, suffocating in a truck, dying of thirst on a road in Greece because theyâ€™re tourists or just looking for a new job in England?
No, because they too are fleeing extermination. If they take the risk of drowning, itâ€™s because they know that the alternative is to be gassed, shot, bombed, starved. It isnâ€™t the Shoah â€" or perhaps not yet.
Hundreds of Afghan and Syrian refugees arrive in Piraeus, Greece, on Sept. 3 â€" Photo: Michael Debets/Pacific Press/ZUMA
More than a crisis
What will we call this human tide washing over Europe, a few years from now? How will we justify in our history books and our official lamentations this exodus that Europeans, both the people and their political leaders, are trying to reduce to a technical â€œcrisisâ€ that simply calls for a few legal adjustments in the definition of refugee status?
If Nathan was still alive, I donâ€™t doubt for a moment that he would look at Ali or Ahmed and see himself, his own face, his own fate, his own distress. Nathan would recognize all the arguments that, back then, were used to prevent him from crossing the same borders: that the economic situation in Western Europe wouldnâ€™t allow them to fit in, that the public opinion opposes the arrival of more foreigners, Jews and other aliens, whose numbers are already too big for a government to take that risk. Wasnâ€™t Nathan exaggerating the threats that was supposedly hanging over his and his peopleâ€™s heads? Surely that Hitler person would eventually become reasonable â€¦
Will Isaias Afwerki, the Eritrean dictator, Bashar al-Assad and the jihadist groups devastating the Middle East ever become reasonable? Nobody in the West is trying to make them. The only initiative that was at some point considered was François Hollandeâ€™s willingness to bomb Assadâ€™s headquarters. It ended up blocked, in 2013, by Barack Obama, in a move reminiscent of the 1938 Munich Agreement.
The only Western leader whoâ€™s now assessing the reality of the tragedy and whoâ€™s offering appropriate humanitarian solutions is Angela Merkel. As a German, she knows that Ahmed is Nathan, only 75 years later.
We all know the seemingly rational objections â€" that these people are not Europeans and canâ€™t integrate in our societies, that the economy canâ€™t take on that burden. But what sounds true is false. These people are refugees, who once accepted into Europe, would bring their education and their capacity for work. Most of them are young and determined, as their exile demonstrates. Migration is a terrible selection of the fittest against the weakest. The United States has always developed faster than Europe thanks to the dynamism of migrants, whereas Europe declines as it grows older.
Cultural integration would be unthinkable, wouldnâ€™t it? The argument seems to make sense, but strangely assumes that Europe is culturally, ethnically and religiously, a pure, immaculate jewel.
In truth, Europe is a blended accumulation, a melting pot of cultures that, put together, constitute the European civilization. I remember a former French Prime Minister, Michel Rocard, who, faced with immigration on a smaller scale, thought heâ€™d solved the problem by simply saying that â€œEurope cannot accommodate all the misery in the world.â€
We could retort that Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey have sheltered 3 million refugees, while Europe has accommodated just 300,000. For this, I am ashamed for Europe, of its selfishness, its historical short-sightedness and its contented little bourgeois arrogance.
That is why I say today that Ahmed is my brother and Latifa my sister. Because, you see, Nathan was my father.
Cleaner aviation fuel
Fees imposed on the airline industry should be funneled into a climate fund.
High-flying ambitions for the sector
Hydrogen and electrification
Meanwhile, Rolls-Royce is looking to smash the speed record of electrical flights with a newly designed 23-foot-long model. Christened the Spirit of Innovation, the small plane took off for the first time earlier this month and successfully managed a 15-minute long test flight. However, the company has announced plans to fly the machine faster than 300 mph (480 km/h) before the year is out, and also to sell similar propulsion systems to companies developing electrical air taxis or small commuter planes.
New aircraft designs
International first class will be very nearly a thing of the past.
Aerial view of Rome's Fiumicino airportcommons.wikimedia.org
Data privacy issues
Auckland Airport, New Zealand
The billion-dollar question: Will we fly less?
40% of Swedes intend to travel less
- How Persian Gulf Airlines Surged To Top Class Of Travel Industry ... ›
- How Countries Are Coping With A Tanking Tourism Industry ... ›
- COVID Recovery? End-Of-Summer Checkup On Travel Industry ... ›