When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

Blueprint For A Second European Renaissance

The contradiction of European democracy is that while citizens are freer, they feel more powerless towards global developments
The contradiction of European democracy is that while citizens are freer, they feel more powerless towards global developments
Daniel Dettling*

-OpEd-

BERLIN — The late Chancellor Helmut Kohl, a great European who led Germany through its unification, was wrong. European integration is no longer "irreversible." Today, in 2019, disintegration is the declared goal of many member states. It is dependency, not independence, that has until now made Europe strong. For the future, Europe does not need a Declaration of Independence, but a Declaration of Interdependence.

The contradiction of European democracy is that while citizens are freer, they feel more powerless towards global developments such as migration, climate change and digitization. Populists take advantage of this fear of the future. They promise their constituents identity and intimacy, feeling and belonging and a return to the alleged "good old days."

But a return to the past would be fatal. Europe would continue to lose sovereigntyvis-a-vis the U.S., China and Russia, politically, economically and socially. Citizens don't want "no Europe," but they want a different one — a Europe that gives them back control over their lives. This requires a new balance of sovereignty, democracy, subsidiarity and solidarity.

What about an Interrail pass for EU youth?—Photo: ::ErWin

Europe must be more "sovereign" in facing global challenges such as migration, climate, terror and digitization. Europe will have to think bigger and wider as the U.S. withdraws from the continent and powers such as China and India become stronger globally.

Above all, "sovereign" are those who decide to pursue a policy of cooperation and equality rather than a policy of unilateralism and coercion; those who protect their citizens. With the new security situation in the world, a common defense and energy union is on the agenda, as is a European asylum authority and joint border police.

Second, the EU must become more democratic. The European model in the digital age is not data capitalism (like in the U.S.) or data authoritarianism (like in China), but a social digital market economy. However, Europe has completely relinquished control of algorithms to private American companies.

The biggest supporters of the EU nowadays are young people.

The director of Bayerischer Rundfunk public radio, Ulrich Wilhelm, has recently proposed a European digital infrastructure in response to the U.S. and Chinese platforms to defend European values and rules in the digital space. Germany and France should get it started.

The European response to globalization is not superstate or national state, but subsidiarity. The future of democracy is decided in the regions, cities and local communities. Mayors and regional politicians are the bearers of a European movement for inclusion, environmental protection and new mobility. The answer to the global struggle for the best ideas and minds is a European network of partnerships between cities, schools and universities.

Fourth, solidarity must become stronger. The biggest supporters of the EU nowadays are young people. Three suggestions: Every European should live in another EU country for at least half a year during school. Every EU citizen should receive an Interrail pass for their 18th birthday. Every young woman and every young man should carry out civil or military service in a EU member state before the age of 25.

Fifteen years ago, U.S. economist Jeremy Rifkin predicted the slow death of the "American dream" and the emergence of a European one. Instead of being afraid of its own maturity, Europe should embark on a new enlightenment.

Europe can stand for a second Renaissance if it uses its opportunities — confident and in command.


*Daniel Dettling is the founder of the Zukunftspolitik think tank.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

What's Spoiling The Kids: The Big Tech v. Bad Parenting Debate

Without an extended family network, modern parents have sought to raise happy kids in a "hostile" world. It's a tall order, when youngsters absorb the fears (and devices) around them like a sponge.

Image of a kid wearing a blue striped sweater, using an ipad.

Children exposed to technology at a very young age are prominent today.

Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ — A 2021 report from the United States (the Youth Risk Behavior Survey) found that 42% of the country's high-school students persistently felt sad and 22% had thought about suicide. In other words, almost half of the country's young people are living in despair and a fifth of them have thought about killing themselves.

Such chilling figures are unprecedented in history. Many have suggested that this might be the result of the COVID-19 pandemic, but sadly, we can see depression has deeper causes, and the pandemic merely illustrated its complexity.

I have written before on possible links between severe depression and the time young people spend on social media. But this is just one aspect of the problem. Today, young people suffer frequent and intense emotional crises, and not just for all the hours spent staring at a screen. Another, possibly more important cause may lie in changes to the family composition and authority patterns at home.

Firstly: Families today have fewer members, who communicate less among themselves.

Young people marry at a later age, have fewer children and many opt for personal projects and pets instead of having children. Families are more diverse and flexible. In many countries, the number of children per woman is close to or less than one (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong among others).

In Colombia, women have on average 1.9 children, compared to 7.6 in 1970. Worldwide, women aged 15 to 49 years have on average 2.4 children, or half the average figure for 1970. The changes are much more pronounced in cities and among middle and upper-income groups.

Of further concern today is the decline in communication time at home, notably between parents and children. This is difficult to quantify, but reasons may include fewer household members, pervasive use of screens, mothers going to work, microwave ovens that have eliminated family cooking and meals and, thanks to new technologies, an increase in time spent on work, even at home. Our society is addicted to work and devotes little time to minors.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest