When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
Ideas

Time To Put NATO Military Intervention In Ukraine On The Table

The gruesome images from Bucha are shocking. But how many more massacred Ukrainian civilians will it take before the West and NATO say enough? The West's constant fear of escalation makes things easy for Putin.

Photo of a training area in Germany with U.S. airforce

U.S. air force tactical air control party operators in German joint

Anna Schneider

-OpEd-

BERLIN — Dead bodies in the streets. Civilians, tied up and executed, left half-buried. There is no adequate description for the images from Bucha except: horror. They are crimes against humanity for which Russian President Vladimir Putin is responsible.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Thus, the sudden burst of joy of Ukrainians seeing Russian troops withdrawing from the region around Kyiv last weekend was painfully brief. Now it is clear what Putin means when he speaks of the "liberation" of the population from a "Nazi regime."


German politics, meanwhile, is practicing consternation — nothing new on the Western front either. "The images from Bucha shock me, they shock us deeply," declared German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier.

The Srebrenica moment?

Everyone from German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock to German Chancellor Olaf Scholz agree that sanctions against Russia must now be tightened and those responsible held accountable.

Is this really all that can be done?

Both are important, but they are not enough. Looking at the push for a gas and oil embargo, or the miserable record of the promised German arms exports that were never actually delivered, one can't help but wonder: Is this really all that can be done?

Some have long spoken of the "Srebrenica moment": 30 years ago, the Srebrenica massacre during the war in Yugoslavia triggered NATO's intervention against Serbia. Now comparing one historical circumstance with another is always skewed; history does not repeat itself.

Yet the question is how many massacred civilians, how many rapes and half-buried women's corpses it will take before the West says: no more. The constant fear of escalation makes things easy for Putin. Hesitation is the opposite of determination, and that is exactly what is needed for successful deterrence.

Photo of two people holding up signs in support of Ukraine

People with signs saying ''NATO & EU Cowards'' and ''Close sky over Ukraine'' at a rally in front of the White House

Michael Brochstein/ZUMA

Scholz's bogus Zeitenwende rearmament

The euphoria surrounding the so-called "Zeitenwende" or turnaround in German foreign policy, with the promise by Scholz to rearm Germany, quickly fizzled out. Germany, it seems, is condemned to sleepwalking. One failure follows the next.

Meeting NATO's target of spending 2% of the country's GDP on defense and equipping the Bundeswehr with a special fund should be a matter of course. The same applies to the decision to finally supply weapons to Ukraine, contrary to years of naive pacifist doctrine. But only defensive weapons, if you please. And not even that is going right, with weapons shipments stalled for weeks.

So while Putin is given enough time to prepare for the next sanctions and people argue about whether it would be acceptable to implement an oil and gas embargo against Russia, one crucial option is left out. It can no longer be taboo to think about NATO's military intervention. Not to attack Russia, but to defend Ukraine and the freedom it stands for.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.


You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Gun Violence In America: Don't Blame The Victims — That Means Rappers Too

The recent shooting of Takeoff, a rapper, is another sad incident of gun crime in the U.S. But those blaming hip hop culture for contributing to gun violence ignore that rappers themselves are also victims. And the real point is that in today's America, nobody is safe from gun violence.

Gun Violence In America: Don't Blame The Victims — That Means Rappers Too

Fans wait outside State Farm Arena in Atlanta to attend the memorial service for Migos rapper Takeoff on Nov. 11

A.D. Carson

Add the name of Takeoff, a member of the popular rap trio Migos, to the ever-growing list of rappers, recent and past, tragically and violently killed.

The initial reaction to the shooting to death of Takeoff, born Kirsnick Ball, on Nov. 1, was to blame rap music and hip hop culture. People who engaged in this kind of scapegoating argue that the violence and despairing hopelessness in the music are the cause of so many rappers dying.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest