When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Protesting Earth Overshoot Day
Protesting Earth Overshoot Day
Stuart Richardson

-Analysis-

PARIS — Wednesday will mark "Earth Overshoot Day," the moment when humanity uses more of the Earth's ecological resources than the planet can regenerate in a year. This awkwardly named annual event, first conceived by the UK think tank New Economics Foundation in 2006, is a way to track the accumulating effects of climate change. And indeed, the day comes a little bit earlier each year. Just five years ago, the globe observed it 10 days later, on Aug. 12 — a clear sign that the human race is living beyond its environmentally-sustainable means.

The increased interest in the event this year probably has something to do with President Donald Trump's decision to remove the United States from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, highlighting how easy it is for even the hardest-won efforts to protect the planet to be reversed by the whims of politics.

Let down by political leaders, many ecologically-conscious global citizens are returning to individual and small-scale efforts to lighten the world's carbon footprint. The environmentalist's mantra of "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" is back in vogue at the same time that the digital economy fuels a new acceleration of global consumerism.

Amazon wiped out the very notion of periphery.

Writing in The Guardian, Martin Lukacs recalls an email he received that listed 30 suggestions for "greening" an office. Use reusable pens. Stop using the elevator. Purchase eco-friendly appliances. It's a tedious list of oft-forgotten strategies which, while thoughtful, never really asks its recipient to consume less, but rather to consume differently.

The ease with which the globalized world can now access and obtain goods and services is quite staggering. But columnist João Pereira Coutinho, writing in the Brazilian daily Folha de S. Paulo, lauds the pace of consumer-driven innovation, singling out Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos for particular praise.

Capitalism, Pereira Coutinho argues, is ultimately a democratizing force more powerful than government itself. "Amazon wiped out the very notion of periphery," he writes. It is true that a growing majority of the world's inhabitants can now theoretically "acquire" infinite knowledge (and yes, goods and services, too) by way of digital commerce and delivery.

Still, business left to its own devices tends to err on the side of short-term profit, just as politics inevitably is driven by the next election cycle. That leaves we the people, so often reduced to mere subjects of governments and corporations, to save our planet. Could greening our consumption habits help us save the planet? The likes of Amazon give us ever easier access to these new eco-friendly goods and services to help reduce our carbon footprints. Yet it all seems to feed our growing appetites for consuming as an end in itself. Truly, when it comes to "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle," the first "R" may be the hardest change to make.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Coronavirus

Will China's Zero COVID Ever End?

Too much has been put in to the state-sponsored truth that minimal spread of the virus is the at-all-cost objective. But if the Chinese economy continues to suffer, Xi Jinping may have no choice but to second guess himself.

COVID testing in Guiyang, China

Cfoto/DDP via ZUMA
Deng Yuwen

The tragic bus accident in Guiyang last month — in which 27 people being sent to quarantine were killed — was one of the worst examples of collateral damage since the COVID-19 pandemic began in China nearly three years ago. While the crash can ultimately be traced back to bad government policy, the local authorities did not register it as a Zero COVID related casualty. It was, for them, a simple traffic accident.

The officials in the southern Chinese province of Guizhou, of course, had no alternative. Drawing a link between the deadly crash and the strict policy of Zero COVID, touted by President Xi Jinping, would have revealed the absurdity of the government's choices.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ