When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

What Trump's Twitter Ban Means For The Rest Of The World

By closing Donald Trump's social media accounts, the Big Tech platforms have recognized for the first time their fundamental responsibility for the content they broadcast. But for this and other reasons that now also means the regulators must step up.

This blue bird has flown
This blue bird has flown
Julie Chauveau


PARIS — Do we have the right to silence a man for taking extreme positions, particularly if we are a private company? And what if the individual in question is the democratically elected head of state? These philosophical questions have suddenly become urgent with Twitter's decision to ban the account of the American president, Donald Trump, after the whole world watched in dismay as his supporters invaded the Capitol.

For a long time, the platforms claimed to be mere "pipes' transporting information rather than generating it. This relieves them, unlike other forms of mass media, of responsibility for the content produced. They have given weak consent to establish general terms of use which must be signed before anyone registers on their sites.

By suspending the president's accounts on Jan. 8, Twitter, and later Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitch all were admitting for the first time their need to set limits. Anyone who respects the democratic process should be happy to see a supremacist encounter obstacles, even if it has arrived late.

A platform is still a private space even if it addresses the whole world.

However, philosophy and economics don't necessarily go well together. A company should not have to decide by itself whether to cut off the president of the new world superpower. French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire, who is seeking to impose a tax on the revenues of GAFA (Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon), insisted on the fact that regulation must be established "by the sovereign people, by the States, and by justice." Angela Merkel judged the social media shutdowns as "problematic."

Who should be the judge? What would happen if Twitter decided to exclude a particular NGO or celebrity because their discourse is displeasing? A platform is still a private space even if it addresses the whole world. One must build a legal framework with extremely reactive alert systems because the time frame for the law is not the same as the time frame or tech platforms.

Meanwhile, the European Commission has drafted two regulations on digital markets and services with rights and obligations that can lead to the closure of platforms if they do not police well enough. France, at least, is working on the creation of a digital tribunal of sorts. But this subject goes far beyond that, with the U.S.-based GAFA behemoths having grown so powerful that they are influencing the behavior of citizens around the world. Often this goes in the right direction, for example, when they promote efficient legitimate commerce or the spread of culture.

But the internet has also emboldened the extremists who wore buffalo costumes and flew Confederate flags in Washington, just like it allows criminals to sell counterfeit goods online. Ever more, the need for law enforcement in the digital space is no longer in doubt.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Report: Wagner Group Is Back Fighting In Ukraine For First Time Since Aborted Coup

After a sighting by a Ukrainian drone operator, details emerge of how the Russian mercenary group has been redeployed in the strategic Ukrainian city of Bakhmut it had helped conquer earlier this year. That was followed by the dramatic coup and departure from Ukraine led by Wagner's now late leader Yevgeny Prigozhin.

Photo of a Ukrainian soldier walking past a destroyed building

A Ukrainian soldier earlier this month walking in front of a damaged building


Fighters affiliated with the Wagner Group have once again been spotted on the battlefield near Bakhmut in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region, according to a Ukrainian drone operator. This confirmation supports earlier reports from Russian sources regarding the resurgence of Wagner mercenaries near the strategic city in eastern Ukraine.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

“Wagner is here,” the drone operator said, adding that the Wagnerites had “quickly changed commanders and returned.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest