When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

eyes on the U.S.

Mueller Probe, A True Test For American Democracy

Washington and the Trump administration are reeling after the first charges are filed in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election.

File photo of Mueller on June 21, 2017
File photo of Mueller on June 21, 2017
Michael Scherer


WASHINGTON - The hardest part for official Washington, D.C., is not knowing what happens next.

Amid the fast-moving criminal investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election, every corner of the city finds itself preparing for the unexpected.

Democrats fret that President Donald Trump might try to shut down the inquiry. Republicans worry that their last best hope for a legislative win, a tax overhaul, could fall victim to the scandal. And the president's denial that his campaign worked in any way with Russia continues to be tested by new disclosures.

The only person with any significant control over events, Special Counsel Robert Mueller, offered no hints Monday on his next move beyond the day's bombshells - a series of legal filings, including the indictment of two former Trump campaign officials and the guilty plea of a third.

And the possibilities seemed only to grow as the day wore on. Hours after the first indictments landed, a leading Democratic lobbyist, Tony Podesta, announced that he would leave his firm, after his firm's apparent role in a Ukrainian lobbying campaign was described in court papers.

"We are in a real testing time for democracy," said Thomas Mann, a scholar at the Brookings Institution. "You really have to go back to Watergate to find anything of this scope and dimension."

Former Democratic strategist David Axelrod liked to say that presidential campaigns give MRIs of the soul of candidates. The corollary is that criminal investigations can similarly expose the hidden malignancies of Washington.

The sort of tradecraft that rarely becomes public

The release of the charges followed the disclosure that a prominent Democratic lawyer and a news outlet backed by a major Republican donor had at different times paid a firm that compiled opposition research on Trump alleging ties to Russian interests that could threaten national security.

Both disclosures were the sort of tradecraft that rarely becomes public, but there was little sign that they would be the last. Mueller has signaled that he will seek to turn every stone in his search and use all available legal tools. Monday's court papers revealed that he had decided to file charges under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a nearly 80-year-old law that regulates lobbying for foreign powers but that rarely leads to criminal charges.

Legal experts say the Mueller investigation is likely to bring more charges, not to mention a protracted legal process that is likely to distract from other priorities.

"The charges brought last week could easily result in prosecutions extending into 2019, just on the trial level, not even the appellate level," said Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University Law School. "That is going to continue to have a dysfunctional impact on the Trump Administration."

That raises the prospects for political distractions that could continue into the 2018 campaign season, possibly complicating Republican efforts to hold the House and Senate. It also undercuts the expectations of White House aides, who say they expect the Mueller investigation to conclude soon.

Already, there are signs that the growing scandal has begun to distract from a key week for Republicans looking to build momentum behind tax legislation.

On Capitol Hill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., avoided questions from reporters on the indictments. At a separate event, House Speaker Paul Ryan said this when asked about the indictments: "I really don't have anything to add, other than nothing's going to derail what we're doing in Congress."

"It has added a degree of unpredictability and volatility into what was already an unpredictable environment," said Simon Rosenberg, a Democratic strategist. "It ends up just being a thing that just started eating up bandwidth."

Even the president found himself caught off guard, when he prematurely tweeted his own absolution hours after indictments were announced of his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and a top deputy, Rick Gates. At 10:25 a.m., Trump felt it safe to boast that the announcements did not directly reference his campaign.

"Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the campaign," Trump wrote on Twitter. "Also, there is NO COLLUSION!"

Minutes later, Mueller's team announced a previously secret guilty plea of a third Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, who worked on foreign policy in a volunteer capacity. In court papers, Papadopoulos described in detail his 2016 efforts to arrange contacts with people he knew to be Russian agents, including one person who had told him about Russian "dirt" on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, including "thousands of emails."

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to giving false statements to federal agents in his initial interviews about the interactions. He now says that he discussed the Russian overtures he had received with several other people in the Trump campaign, including a "senior policy adviser," "campaign supervisor" and a "high-ranking campaign official." Among the campaign officials he emailed were campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, campaign chairman Paul Manafort and national campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis.

The media will be consumed

The campaign officials are not identified in court documents, but some of the emails cited by federal prosecutors match messages described in August to The Washington Post by people familiar with their contents.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders chose not to acknowledge that confession later in the day. "Today's announcement has nothing to do with the president, has nothing to do with the president's campaign or campaign activity," she said, arguing that the work by Papadopoulos to coordinate a Russian meeting with the campaign did not amount to a campaign effort.

Podesta's decision to leave his firm amounted to the first collateral damage for Democrats from the Russian investigation. One of the party's most powerful lobbyists and effective fundraisers, he is also the brother of Clinton's 2016 campaign chairman, John Podesta.

The Manafort and Gates indictments described the efforts of "Company B," which appears to be Tony Podesta's firm, the Podesta Group, to help the government of Ukraine. A principal from Podesta's firm is described as privately warning Gates that his talking points on work on the lobbying contract could be contradicted by "lots of email traffic."

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer put out a warning to Trump not to interfere with the ongoing probe. "If he does, Congress must respond swiftly, unequivocally and in a bipartisan way to ensure that the investigation continues," he said in a statement.

Republicans, meanwhile, seemed more concerned that the scandal not distract from the effort to pass tax legislation before the end of the year. Lobbyist Charlie Black, a former business partner of Manafort, worried that the focus on the investigation could. "The agenda of politics is dictated by the news media most of the time," said lobbyist Charlie Black, a former business partner of Manafort. "And the news media will be consumed by these scandal issues." Black noted that all of his 65 clients are interested in the outcome of the tax fight.

Grover Norquist, a conservative activist working on tax legislation, said the current situation recalled moments during the scandals of the 1990s. "There was a period of months during Monica Lewinsky when I could have set my hair on fire and I would not have gotten on television," he said, arguing that more debate over taxes would help his side. "It's a distraction."

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

How Iran's Women-Led Protests Have Exposed The 'Islamist Racket' Everywhere

By defending their fundamental rights, Iranian women are effectively fighting for the rights of all in the Middle East. Their victory could spell an end to Islamic fundamentalism that spouts lies about "family values" and religion.

Protests like this in Barcelona have been sparked all over the world to protest the Tehran regime.

Davide Bonaldo/SOPA Images via ZUMA
Kayhan London


Iran's narrow-minded, rigid and destructive rulers have ruined the lives of so many Iranians, to the point of forcing a portion of the population to sporadically rise up in the hope of forcing changes. Each time, the regime's bloody repression forces Iranians back into silent resignation as they await another chance, when a bigger and bolder wave of protests will return to batter the ramparts of dictatorship.

It may just be possible that this time, in spite of the bloodshed, a bankrupt regime could finally succumb to the latest wave of protests, sparked by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini at the hands of the so-called "morality police."

Women have always played a role in the social and political developments of modern Iran, thanks in part to 50 years of secular monarchy before the Iranian Revolution of 1979. And that role became the chief target of reaction when it gained, or regained, power in the early days of 1979, after a revolution replaced the monarchy with a self-styled Islamic republic.

Whether it was women's attire and appearance, or their rights and opportunities in education and work, access to political and public life or juridical and civil rights — all these became intolerable to the new clerical authorities.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less