Sources

Yulin To Paris: Dog-Eating At Center Of Animal Rights Battle

A Chinese dog meat festival has generated outrage in France. The controversy is a complex dance between animal rights, racism and consumer hypocrisy.

Dog rescued from Yulin, now in Paris
Dog rescued from Yulin, now in Paris
Hu Wenyan

YULIN — It's been four days since Mr. Cracker arrived in Paris, and his program today includes a stroll in the park, a nap and a meditation session on the lawn before a photo shoot later this afternoon in front of the Eiffel Tower.

Mr. Cracker is from China, but he's neither a film star nor a nouveau riche tourist. He's a dog, a seven-year-old Corgi mix who once found himself in a slaughterhouse in Yulin, the southern Chinese town notorious for its dog-meat festival. Mr. Cracker is one of nine dogs rescued from China this summer by the Association Stéphane Lamart, named after its founder, a former policeman.

Emblematic of China's dog-eating tradition, Yulin has come under global scrutiny and has become the scene, in recent years, of intense animal rights disputes. As Stéphane Lamart noted, Yulin is indeed a great propaganda tool for his association. His initiative to travel to Yulin to rescue dogs helped him raise 25,000 euros in just two weeks.

In France, where animal protection laws date back two centuries, dogs and cats were legally recognized in 2015 as living being endowed with sensitivity" and are no longer simply regarded as property. This redefinition is highly symbolic as the vegetarianism and "anti-species discrimination" movements have gradually entered the public eye.

Yulin Dog Meat Festival is the straw that broke the camel's back.

And now a new focus on practices far from French territory. On May 29th, a protest took place near the historic Invalides complex in Paris against the dog-eating festivities thousands of miles away in Yulin. The dozens of people present included those holding puppets with protest signs, as well as protesters dressed up as pink cartoon dogs. The loudspeaker called on passersby to "change ideas' and "eliminate barbarism," and shocking pictures showed bloody scenes of dog slaughter in Yulin's streets— and the various dishes made from dog meat.

At the end of the rally, Stéphane Lamart and Phil Barney, a French singer, each holding a box with a total of 170,115 signatures inside, left the square to go to the Chinese Embassy in Paris located across the river Seine. Lamart ended up mailing the signatures to the embassy, patiently mailing 30 pages each day, until they were all sent out.

"Were it not because of Yulin, the fact that Chinese people eat dogs and cats wouldn't have caused so many concerns. Yulin Dog Meat Festival is the straw that broke the camel's back. It is impossible to be indifferent when you see those cruel pictures," said Stéphane Lamart, who has set up two animal shelters— one for dogs and the other for donkeys— over the last 19 years.

"We may be wrong generalizing about China and thinking that it represents everything— an Asian country that eats dogs," Lamart added. "But ultimately, the purpose is to use this to pressure the country and force it to change."

Anti-Yulin festival protest — Photo: Velar Grant/ZUMA

Currently, China only has a wildlife protection law and lacks comprehensive, protective legislation on eating animals kept as pets. As one of the professors currently drafting a new attempt at a animal protection law, Sun Jiang from Northwest University reckons that traditional Chinese culture has no lack of love for living beings, but "modern Chinese society has gone through enormous changes and transformations. Since the concept of protecting animals hasn't become a compulsory regulation, it has led to an absence of ethical living in a contemporary society driven by interests and realistic considerations."

In the face of Lamart's protest, Chinese living in Paris and beyond ask: Why is the finger always pointed at the Chinese?

Westerners do not eat dogs, but they do eat other animals including horses. Are they therefore entitled to criticize the Chinese from a moral perspective? Are they aware that there is also a strong voice in China boycotting Yulin?

After all, it is a minority of Chinese people who have this peculiar appetite. The idea that people are free to eat dogs is not popular at all in China. As a survey conducted in 2016 by China's CCTV showed, 64 % of citizens support the legislation to ban the practice.

It was in 2010 that Yulin's dog-meat butchers initiated the festival. In the beginning the local government supported it because the so-called cultural festival was used as an important vector to promote the local economy. Yet the festival has seen increasing backlash both in China and internationally. In 2015 and 2016, global celebrities, including supermodel Gisele Bündchen, rallied tens of millions of people from all over the world on different social media platforms to petition for an end to the festival.

Yielding to the pressure, the Yulin authorities' stance on the festival has changed from supporting it to keeping a distance, although the festival has yet to be banned.

Why is the finger always pointed at the Chinese?

As Yulin and China have become negatively labeled by the international community, some Chinese people who were originally against the festival have become defensive and paranoid. The question that started as one of appetite has turned into a battle over identity, whether the practice is "barbaric cruelty" or "traditional custom."

The act of bringing back nine dogs from China back to France wasn't as dramatic as one would have imagined. It was William Burkhardt, the 30-year-old founder of the French chapter of Direct Action Everywhere (DxE), an American network of animal rights activists, who went to China this summer along with two other companions.

"What we want French people to understand is that Chinese people may eat dogs and cats, but we eat pork and beef. This is the pot calling the kettle black. If we want them to stop, we should stop eating any meat ourselves," said Burkhardt, who became a vegetarian ten years ago and a vegan six years ago.

Even though his message wasn't exactly the same as that of Stéphane Lamart's Association, it still helped him with a Facebook-based fundraiser for his trip.

Before setting out, Burkhardt planned to take videos of China's dog meat market and slaughterhouses to make the French people reflect on their consumption model. Their unrealistic hope of conducting a "cross-border dog rescue commando raid," faced many technical challenges: Taking any pet out of the country requires immunization procedures, chip identification, three blood tests, etc.

With a language barrier and no familiarity with China, the three youngsters had many doors shut in their faces even though they stayed in the country for ten days. After a lot of effort, they did manage to bring back nine dogs from two dog shelters. Burkhardt was thrilled to adopt Mr. Cracker, while the other eight all found homes within two weeks.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

"The Truest Hypocrisy" - The Russia-NATO Clash Seen From Moscow

Russia has decided to cut off relations with the Western military alliance. But Moscow says it was NATO who really wanted the break based on its own internal rationale.

NATO chief Stoltenberg and Russian Foregin Minister Lavrov

Russian Foreign Ministry/TASS via ZUMA
Pavel Tarasenko and Sergei Strokan

MOSCOW — The Russian Foreign Ministry's announcement that the country's permanent representation to NATO would be shut down for an indefinite period is a major development. But from Moscow's viewpoint, there was little alternative.

These measures were taken in response to the decision of NATO on Oct. 6 to cut the number of personnel allowed in the Russian mission to the Western alliance by half. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the removal of accreditations was from eight employees of the Russian mission to NATO who were identified as undeclared employees of Russian intelligence." We have seen an increase in Russian malicious activity for some time now," Stoltenberg said.


The Russian Foreign Ministry called NATO's expulsion of Russian personnel a "ridiculous stunt," and Stoltenberg's words "the truest hypocrisy."

In announcing the complete shutdown in diplomacy between Moscow and NATO, the Russian Foreign Ministry added: "The 'Russian threat' is being hyped in strengthen the alliance's internal unity and create the appearance of its 'relevance' in modern geopolitical conditions."

The number of Russian diplomatic missions in Brussels has been reduced twice unilaterally by NATO in 2015 and 2018 - after the alliance's decision of April 1, 2014 to suspend all practical civilian and military cooperation between Russia and NATO in the wake of Russia's annexation of Crimea. Diplomats' access to the alliance headquarters and communications with its international secretariat was restricted, military contacts have frozen.

Yet the new closure of all diplomatic contacts is a perilous new low. Kommersant sources said that the changes will affect the military liaison mission of the North Atlantic alliance in Moscow, aimed at promoting the expansion of the dialogue between Russia and NATO. However, in recent years there has been no de facto cooperation. And now, as Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has announced, the activities of the military liaison mission will be suspended. The accreditation of its personnel will be canceled on November 1.

NATO told RIA Novosti news service on Monday that it regretted Moscow's move. Meanwhile, among Western countries, Germany was the first to respond. "It would complicate the already difficult situation in which we are now and prolong the "ice age," German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told reporters.

"Lavrov said on Monday, commenting on the present and future of relations between Moscow and the North Atlantic Alliance, "If this is the case, then we see no great need to continue pretending that any changes will be possible in the foreseeable future because NATO has already announced that such changes are impossible.

The suspension of activities of the Russian Permanent Mission to NATO, as well as the military liaison and information mission in Russia, means that Moscow and Brussels have decided to "draw a final line under the partnership relations of previous decades," explained Andrei Kortunov, director-general of the Russian Council on Foreign Affairs, "These relations began to form in the 1990s, opening channels for cooperation between the sides … but they have continued to steadily deteriorate over recent years."

Kortunov believes the current rupture was promoted by Brussels. "A new strategy for NATO is being prepared, which will be adopted at the next summit of the alliance, and the previous partnership with Russia does not fit into its concept anymore."

The existence and expansion of NATO after the end of the Cold War was the main reason for the destruction of the whole complex of relations between Russia and the West. Today, Russia is paying particular attention to marking red lines related to the further steps of Ukraine's integration into NATO. Vladimir Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov previously stated this, warning that in response to the alliance's activity in the Ukrainian direction, Moscow would take "active steps" to ensure its security.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ