When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Banksy's
Banksy's
Anne-Laure Bandle

It would not be surprising if a mural on government surveillance that went missing last month turned up for sale on the art market.

The Spy Booth artwork in the town of Cheltenham in England, created by British artist Banksy, was removed from the wall it had lived on for two years. The mural, which attracted lots of tourists, was granted a protection last year by the Cheltenham borough council that ensured that no one could remove the work.

David Possee, the owner of the wall where Spy Booth was featured, and who was once offered more than 1 million pounds for the mural, denies having sold it. He claims instead that it was accidentally reduced to rubble by workmen carrying out repairs.

If the mural does turn up at an art auction, it wouldn't be the first to do so.

Another Banksy mural, Slave Labour, was auctioned for $1 million after it had gone missing from Wood Green neighborhood in northern London. The record prices reached for street art such as Banksy's is a recent phenomenon.

[rebelmouse-image 27090425 alt="""" original_size="1024x683" expand=1]

Banksy's "Slave Labour" — Photo: DeptfordJon

The sale of street art removed from public spaces emerged in the 1970s and 1980s. At that time, the famous charcoal drawings of artist Keith Haring were stolen from the walls of New York's subway stations as soon as they appeared. The growing popularity of street art is partly due to the fashion world, museums and advertising campaigns that have appropriated the artform.

Legally speaking, the sale of street art raises a number of questions. Who is responsible for the protection of street art? Who is the real owner of the piece and who has the right to sell it? In principle, unwanted graffiti and collages belong to the owner of the building they were drawn on. This rule was confirmed by a high court judgment about an ownership dispute over Banksy's Art Buff last year.

The ownership right must be differentiated from the copyright and the right of reproduction. The French street artist Invader was unsuccessful in convincing the criminal court in Paris that removing his work from walls to sell it on the market was an infringement of copyright. He argued that distribution of his work was an act against his will. The court dismissed his claim, saying that the defendant had always considered his artwork an illegal attachment. Furthermore, the artist could not prove that his piece had been taken down with the intention to sell or distribute it.

[rebelmouse-image 27090426 alt="""" original_size="1024x683" expand=1]

One of Invader's pieces, near the Eiffel Tower — Photo: Guilhem Vellut

There is no reliable way to authenticate street art, making the sale of it problematic. Some dealers and auction houses avoid selling street art at all for this reason. Until it closed down, the authentication committee of the Keith Haring Foundation refused to validate any of Haring's drawings in subway stations. Banksy's authentication committee did not certify Banksy's artwork by explaining that the works were never intended for marketing.

Courts will likely continue to hear many more cases about the removal of street art until there's legal clarity about the phenomenon.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Jehovah's Witnesses Translate The Bible In Indigenous Language — Is This Colonialism?

The Jehovah's Witnesses in Chile have launched a Bible version translated into the native Mapudungun language, evidently indifferent to the concerns of a nation striving to save its identity from the Western cultural juggernaut.

A Mapuche family awaits for Chilean President Gabriel Boric to arrive at the traditional Te Deum in the Cathedral of Santiago, on Chile's Independence Day.

Claudia Andrade

NEUQUÉN — The Bible can now be read in Mapuzugun, the language of the Mapuche, an ancestral nation living across Chile and Argentina. It took the Chilean branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses, a latter-day Protestant church often associated with door-to-door proselytizing and cold calling, three years to translate it into "21st-century Mapuzugun".

The church's Mapuche members in Chile welcomed the book when it was launched in Santiago last June, but some of their brethren see it rather as a cultural imposition. The Mapuche were historically a fighting nation, and fiercely resisted both the Spanish conquerors and subsequent waves of European settlers. They are still fighting for land rights in Chile.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ