When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


Where Evil Was Born: Austria Grapples With Hitler's Birthplace

What should be done with the house where Adolf Hitler was born? It's a difficult question facing the Austrian city of Braunau as the 500-year-old building slowly falls apart.

One-year-old Hitler and the house he was born in, in Braunau, Austria
One-year-old Hitler and the house he was born in, in Braunau, Austria
Ulli Kulke

BRAUNAU AM INN The Austrian house is dilapidated, having sat unused for over three years. The ochre-colored paint is dirty and peeling, and a garland of mold drapes itself around the building like a black band of sorrow. The door is barricaded, as are the windows, and the interior is left to the imagination. Probably cold, grim and musty. If the Fuehrer knew.

What to do with the birthplace of Braunau's most notorious son? The house is a burden for the town, infamous around the world as the house where Adolf Hitler was born on April 20, 1889.

Here, at Salzburger Vorstadt No. 15 at the corner of Schmiedegasse, Hitler's architectural shadow looms. The house has been listed historical monument since 1938 and is therefore protected by law. But now debate about the appropriate use of the house is escalating.

In its lifetime, it has been a disabled workshop, a guesthouse, a private residence, a bank, even a local library as the lettering next to the doorway tells us. The decorative monogram "MB" can be seen right above the doorway. These initials stand for Martin Bormann, one of Hitler's confidantes. In 1938, Bormann forced the then-owners, the Pommers, to sell the house to him to develop it into a Nazi cultural center. He bought it at a high price and paid nearly the same sum to renovate it. But in 1954 the house was sold back to the Pommers.

Today it is the property of Gerlinde Pommer, but she proves difficult to reach and is blocking any endeavors by the city council and the federal government in Vienna, which rents the house, to turn it into a place of commemoration: "The House of Responsibility," it may be called but no concrete plans yet exist. "We were turned down by her once again," says Mayor Johannes Waidbacher.

No one-night stands with evil

In a 1972 tenancy agreement, the Pommers barred use of the building as a museum or place of admonishment, stating that "no utilization of the building in a contemporary historical frame" was allowed. But why? Did they fear it may become a Hitler Museum, a place of pilgrimage for Neo-Nazis? No one knows, and Mrs. Pommer remains silent.

She forbade installation of a commemorative plaque on the house itself. But although she was against it, she couldn't stop the erection of the Admonition Stone of Peace on the footpath outside the house. The subtenant, a disabled workshop, was forced to move out because Mrs. Pommer refused to have alterations done to the house to make it suitable for the disabled. But she doesn't have to fear the loss of the main tenant.

[rebelmouse-image 27088634 alt="""" original_size="800x533" expand=1]

The Admonition Stone of Peace: "For peace, freedom and democracy/Fascism, never again/Millions of dead are reminding us" — Photo: Anton-kurt

The federal government in Vienna pays 4,880 euros a month, although the house is empty, because it wants to prevent it from falling into the wrong hands. Who knows how much some people would be willing to pay to spend a night in the room where Hitler was born — a one-night stand with evil. Substantial bars in front of the second story windows are there to prevent just that. But is it only such pilgrims who have been drawn to Braunau?

Locals say that they are routinely approached by tourists, usually ordinary citizens chilled to the bone by the nearby horror. But who wants to admit wanting to see Hitler's birthplace, possibly having come just because of that?

"It is conspicuous, that the first question is never about the birthplace," says an employee of the tourist office, "but the second one usually is." Many justify their visit. "All of a sudden, everyone is a history teacher and just so happens to be discussing National Socialism with their students at the moment."

A Bratwurst stand out front

Dropping your guard in front of the house, staring at it, trying to figure out which of the windows is the right one — it's embarrassing. "Many pass by a few times rather than lingering in front of it," an employee of a shop across the road says, "pacing up and down." Some assume that the owner of the Bratwurst stand that was located in front of the house until recently saw a business opportunity in this. He did ease many a tourist's feeling of embarrassment when he sold them the "camouflage" Bratwurst, an effective way to hide the Hitler house-snooping. The Bratwurst stand is now gone, but the house remains.

"The past is not to be appropriated for touristic usage," the mayor says. "This has to be condemned." But the question is, can it be prevented? Is there no room for birthplace pilgrims?

"It's a tightrope walk," Mayor Waidbacher admits.

It always has been for Braunau where Hitler is concerned. Hitler helped Braunau in the end by committing suicide. It actually prevented the remains of the Nazi rabble-rousers defending the city to the last degree, and it would have been, as his birthplace, raised to the ground to prevent the Allies from getting their hands on it. In the end, some might have wanted the Nazis to be a bit more successful in their last attempts to blow up the house in April 1945 — they were restrained. Braunau would not have had to shoulder that burden if they had.

[rebelmouse-image 27088635 alt="""" original_size="1024x680" expand=1]

Photo: Janos Korom Dr.

Hitler might not have been opposed to its razing. To him, it wasn't worth much. Shortly after his coup in 1933, he forbade any investigation into his past. In 1938, when Austria became part of greater Germany, he had all documents relating to his existence destroyed: Improper relationships between his forebears and his dreadful school performance became official state secrets.

When Germany's armed forces moved into Austria on March 12 that year, Hitler crossed the border in an open top car, driving through Braunau, but he didn't even glance at his birthplace. His visit to Braunau was more of a coincidence really, as the city is on the way to Linz — Hitler's favorite city, where he supposedly spent some of the happiest days of his life. He didn't even remember Braunau all that well because his family only lived there for three years. And, known only to a few, he lived in that particular house for only a few months. Only a few weeks for a crying child, but an eternity for Braunau.

[rebelmouse-image 27088636 alt="""" original_size="1024x702" expand=1]

Braunau's city center — Photo: Stadtamt Braunau am Inn

In a short history of the town, Hitler's date of birth isn't even mentioned. But there is, instead, the Admonition Stone in front of Hitler's birthplace. It was erected in 1989 shortly before what would have been Hitler's 100th birthday to keep unwanted guests at bay. It appears that the stone is doing its duty. Before its arrival, some conspicuous gatherings, and even the beginnings of demonstrations, could be observed. Not anymore.

The late 1980s, a turning point for European history in general, was also was a turning point for Austria and Braunau. The collective self-image of victimhood was turned into one of sympathizers and perpetrators in an attempt to deal with history.

The possibility of dispossession

After the Admonition Stone, the local Society for Contemporary History was founded. Its chairman, Florian Kotanko, organizes noteworthy conferences. According to interesting and in-depth surveys conducted for a PhD thesis, Braunau's residents demonstrate an above-average awareness and knowledge of historical events.

Braunau wants to acknowledge its history and its legacy as Hitler"s birthplace. But how can this be done if there is no access to the house?

The Austrian Home Office had hoped to hear from Gerlinde Pommer by the end of January in response to an offer of purchase for the house, but to no avail. As a precautionary measure, a Home Office spokesperson says, the constitutional committee is determining whether there's a way to dispossess Gerlinde Pommer of the house. But experts doubt that public interest in the house and the need for a place of commemoration will provide enough grounds to do so.

It would be piquant in any way. When the Pommers were forced to sell to Martin Bormann in 1938, he threatened them with dispossession to force their hand. Is this to be repeated? Even if the Pommers are only holding out to drive the price up, the parallels between past and present are striking.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski


PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest