When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

India

Hate Speech In India, And Why Reporting It Is Risky

A growing number of Indians — including some lawmakers — have taken to social media to incite violence, particularly against Muslims.

Members of India's Rajput community shout slogans against film director Sanjay Leela Bhansali in protest
Members of India's Rajput community shout slogans against film director Sanjay Leela Bhansali in protest
Shruthi Cauvery Iyer

NEW DELHI — A few weeks back, Ashish Joshi, an official with the department of telecom (DoT), was suspended. The suspension came one day after Joshi filed a complaint against Kapil Mishra, a controversial lawmaker, reporting a Facebook video posted by the latter.

In the video, Mishra calls for attacks on several prominent actors, activists and politicians including Barkha Dutt, Prashanth Bhushan, Kamal Hassan and Naseeruddin Shah. He claims these individuals are "enemies of the nation" and that they support Pakistan. Additionally, he suggests that they should be dragged out of their homes onto the streets.

The DoT, reported the Indian Express, claims that the suspension was due to Joshi's "misuse of powers' because he filed the complaint on a DoT letterhead without the permission of his superiors. Joshi says he was just acting in the public interest and that the use of the letterhead is a standard means of communication between two civil servants.

Joshi is currently on suspension with a 50% pay cut. The message the suspension sends is clear: dissenting against majoritarianism will cost you.

Kapil Mishra called for attacks on prominent figures in a video posted on Facebook — Photo: BMN Network

The nature of the offense reported needs to take center stage here: the increasing use of social media to incite violence against minorities, activists and individuals. This video is part of a trend of attacks, many fatal, on activists, journalists and individuals who have dared to raise their voice against disturbing majoritarian views being posted on social media.

Facebook, WhatsApp and Twitter are turning out to be the best platforms for vigilante groups, extremists, political figures and anyone else trying to spread hate speech. Recently, a list of names of inter-religious couples was posted on Facebook with a call to attack Muslim men for committing "love jihad." Religious leaders from various factions have openly used social media to target individuals and call for bodily harm.

People who follow Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Twitter are actively and boldly targeting individuals who voice opposing views. The prime minister's information technology cell released a statement that Modi supports free speech and has never blocked or unfollowed anyone on Twitter. This statement was released after reports surfaced that Modi's Twitter account followed several accounts that supported the murder of journalist and activist Gauri Lankesh.

There is a growing trend of trolling, threatening and systematic online and offline abuse of activists, journalists and individuals. The victims are targeted due to a laundry list of reasons including religious beliefs, gender, sexual orientation, ideology or just bad luck. Last year, several people were killed over unfounded WhatsApp rumors of child kidnapping.

There have been several cases of doxxing, where the victim's address and personal details are published online along with an open call to attack the said victim.

Threats and incitement of violence

Less than six months ago, lawmaker Suraj Pal Amu offered a Rs 10 crore (nearly $1.5 million) reward to attack actress Deepika Padukone and director Sanjay Leela Bhansali over unfounded claims that the movie Padmaavat had an intimate scene between a Muslim emperor and a Hindu princess.

In a video that went viral, prominent Islamic scholar and politician from Assam, Moulana Badruddin Ajmal is seen openly abusing a journalist and even threatening to smash his head.

While both politicians eventually faced backlash, the incidence of such videos and messages has been increasing. Is this because social media just provides a platform? Or are people using social media to spread hate getting bolder because they know the chances of conviction are low?

Proponents of hate speech are getting bolder.

Last year, a journalist's tweet advocating the killing of a minority community was reported by several Twitter users. Twitter responded that the tweet did not violate its rules. Although the journalist's account was taken down, it was restored within a day. No action was taken against the journalist by law enforcement.

Proponents of hate speech are getting bolder because they are protected by the inefficiency of law enforcement and social media policies. Further, certain proponents have political and public support that makes law enforcement wary of interference.

Not even high-profile politicians and law enforcement officials are spared. External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj was trolled after she intervened to help an inter-religious couple resolve their passport issue. A police officer was attacked on social media for protecting a Muslim man during a mob attack.

While trolling is a more complicated issue, direct threats and calls for violence on social media are more easily addressable. Given the multiplier effect of such online messages, efficient methods to report these crimes need to be developed and supported. Once reported, these complaints need to be quickly addressed so no one is harmed.

While those who perpetrate these crimes are roaming free, is it fair that Joshi, the official who reported such a crime, is suspended?

Shruthi Cauvery Iyer is an MPA student at the Harvard Kennedy School. She concentrates on international and global affairs.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Jehovah's Witnesses Translate The Bible In Indigenous Language — Is This Colonialism?

The Jehovah's Witnesses in Chile have launched a Bible version translated into the native Mapudungun language, evidently indifferent to the concerns of a nation striving to save its identity from the Western cultural juggernaut.

A Mapuche family awaits for Chilean President Gabriel Boric to arrive at the traditional Te Deum in the Cathedral of Santiago, on Chile's Independence Day.

Claudia Andrade

NEUQUÉN — The Bible can now be read in Mapuzugun, the language of the Mapuche, an ancestral nation living across Chile and Argentina. It took the Chilean branch of the Jehovah's Witnesses, a latter-day Protestant church often associated with door-to-door proselytizing and cold calling, three years to translate it into "21st-century Mapuzugun".

The church's Mapuche members in Chile welcomed the book when it was launched in Santiago last June, but some of their brethren see it rather as a cultural imposition. The Mapuche were historically a fighting nation, and fiercely resisted both the Spanish conquerors and subsequent waves of European settlers. They are still fighting for land rights in Chile.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ