When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


An Ode To Procrastination - Why Do It Today When You Can Do It Tomorrow?

Feel free to read this article later...!

The importance of being idle
The importance of being idle
Petra Steinberger

BERLIN - If you’re reading this, you’re one of us. Or somebody in your inner circle is and you’re hoping for a recipe to change them. What are we talking about? Laziness?

Some of the following will apply to you (or your nemesis). You’re chronically late. In the last 48 hours you’ve spent valuable time researching irrelevant facts on your computer, drawn in by one link after another to the encyclopedic quicksand that is the World Wide Web. You may also spend a considerable amount of time just staring off into the distance. Sometimes the dithering carries over into your free time, and you can’t ever seem to make it to the health club or do those cultural things you’ve been meaning to do. Of course all of the above fills you with guilt.

Chances are, you’re a loafer, slacker, idler, sluggard – a lazybones, a dosser! And wasting time is not something our society smiles on. We need to be seen as constantly reachable, available, and mainly busy and productive. That said, we’re now experiencing a certain amount of backlash. Employers for example are starting to stress the need for downtime to their employees, telling them to go easy on cell-phone availability and e-mail checking in their free time.

We’re also seeing a spate of in-praise-of-idleness publications usually aimed at showing that lazy behavior is positive and necessary and all around great if you could just maybe manage to change a couple of little things? But John Perry doesn’t approach the subject that way. He’s professor emeritus of philosophy at Stanford, and a half-time professor at the University of California, Riverside. He’s also a self-described procrastinator.

Some see the chronic deferral of things that is procrastination as a kind of sub-category of laziness. Perry felt guilty about his behavior and then one day – in classic procrastinator’s style, to put off doing something else – he wrote an essay called “Structured Procrastination” (1996) about it.

As he told National Public Radio: "I had a stack of papers to grade and some other stuff to do, and I wasn't doing it, which is pretty typical of me. There was no reason not to do it, but I wasn't doing it, and I really started to get depressed and feel rotten about myself. But then it occurred to me that, you know, I get a lot done. I mean at Stanford, people thought of me as kind of a go-to guy, put me on a lot of committees, gave me a lot of tasks. And I publish all this stuff and manage to keep a job there. ... If I get all this stuff done, how can that be when I'm a crummy procrastinator? And it occurred to me, well, there's a difference between procrastinating and being lazy — I'm not lazy. I do a lot of stuff, as long as it's a way of not doing something else that I'm supposed to do."

Dawdling, lollygagging and postponing

Perry’s essay was soon making the rounds on the Internet – and finding incredible resonance. He’s now turned it into a 92-page book, widely-spaced book, “The Art of Procrastination: A Guide to Effective Dawdling, Lollygagging and Postponing,” and it’s exactly what the doctor ordered for people like us (or your nemesis).

Perry’s thesis is that procrastinators with a plan actually accomplish an enormous amount precisely because they are constantly finding a thousand other things to do to put off the moment when they have to tackle specific projects – which somehow end up getting done also. (By the way, if you can’t seem to get started on that business report, this book is a great way to fill the time until you do.)

If you want practical tips for dealing with idleness, The Idler magazine founded in 1993 by Tom Hodgkinson and Gavin Pretor-Pinney “in order to explore alternatives to the work ethic and promote freedom and the fine art of doing nothing” is a good place to start. This “literature for loafers” is actually a collection of essays that comes out once a year in hardback. Tom Hodgkinson lives out in the country and has a very effective way of dealing with what needs to be done – dividing the sum of it up into doable little parcels to be tackled at different times of year (chop wood, January; bee-keeping, June; brew beer, October; throw party, December).

The other idler, Gavin Pretor-Pinney, is a cloud watcher – and author of “The Cloudspotter’s Guide” and founder of the Cloud Appreciation Society. Then one day at the beach there weren’t any clouds, so he lowered his gaze, and ended up writing “The Wavewatcher’s Companion,” which won the 2011 Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books.

Watching waves and clouds – there is hardly any greater antithesis to the rat race, the ringing cell phone, the e-mails, the tweets, the non-stop bla-bla of the “busy” world engaged in its “relevant productive” endeavors.

If you still can’t shake your guilty feelings, consider these two anecdotes about people who took it easy but made it anyway. Albert Einstein loved to nap. He did so frequently, but always made sure to hold his key chain in one hand so that when he started to seriously fall asleep the chain would drop to the floor and jolt him awake. Marcel Proust used to spend weeks lying in bed. Once he invited a guest over so he could verify – from his bed – that he had captured the person correctly in his novel, In Search of Lost Time. Not bad for a sleepyhead and a lie-about.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski


PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest