When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

EL ESPECTADOR

What The Pandemic Teaches Us About Debt

Colombia is a prime example of how overspending and indebtedness leave little room for error, and why it's important to take a new approach moving forward.

A vendor sits in a store awaiting customers in Bogota, Colombia.
A vendor sits in a store awaiting customers in Bogota, Colombia.
Miguel Villa Uribe

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ — Since the pandemic began, the subject we keep hearing about is the harm it is doing to the economy. Markets have ground to halt, unemployment is spiraling out of control, businesses are closing down and oil — that engine of the world economy for the past 100 years — has dropped in value to below $30 a barrel. It is something between the grotesque and fictional: It means producers are paying customers to take their oil, as they have nowhere to keep it since consumption is limited. How can the economy's interruption for a few months have such a great impact?

The essential problem is the amount of worldwide debt, both public and private. Data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) put total planetary debt at around $190 trillion. The World Bank separately puts the world's GDP at around $80 trillion a year. Which means we are all in deep debt, and the health care crisis is further complicating our situation. We are not just having to deal with what we owe, but must wait until we are earning money again first to survive, then finance our lifestyles.

The same applies to countries: The worst-hit are developing states because their indebtedness is to supplement basic needs through infrastructures that would allow them to emerge from backward conditions. Even a short halt to the economy has a great impact, as states cannot even meet the basic needs that generated their debts.

We are all in deep debt, and the health care crisis is further complicating our situation.

The big economies, as we have seen, have already injected around $8 trillion to stabilize their markets following the crisis. Countries like the United States are strongly indebted (about $22.7 trillion right now) and will now incur another $4 trillion, but in the long term, they owe this money to themselves. That makes it easier for them, unlike emerging economies that owe their debts to the big economies. In simple terms, Colombia, for example, borrows to put a roof and drainage on its house while the United States borrows to remodel its guest house and change the mosaics in its pool. Their budgets are substantially different.

comlombia_pandemic_economy_EE

People sleeping on benches in Bogota, Colombia, as the rest of the country remains under quarantine— Photo:Antonio Galante/VW/ZUMA

Another aspect of the crisis widely affecting economies like ours, in a mainly oil-exporting country, is indebtedness itself. You might imagine oil producers have no debts. In fact, the opposite is true. They incur large debts in order to boost exploration, production or refining capacities, and borrow in principle on the back of stable production forecasts. So if oil becomes worthless for a while (like now), the country loses its principal revenue, though evidently not its debts.

Ecopetrol, for example, owes $1.6 billion, which is itself a destabilizing threat to our economy. In these conditions, oil producing countries recently gathered to see how they could cut production in order to stabilize the price of every barrel of crude. Their efforts have proved futile so far, as there has been a production cut of six million barrels from a total daily production of 80 million barrels. Overproduction is the source of the price collapse we see, but there are two reasons for it. One is the excess debts of oil producers and firms. The second is closing and then reopening the taps is extremely costly, which means producers prefer to keep the oil flowing.

We borrow money to maintain lifestyles that cannot withstand situations of turmoil.

The same applies to any individual who owes money for rent, a car, phone services or credit cards. Obviously, if these are your debts you will have few or no savings, so if you were to lose your job now, you may find yourself out of your flat by the end of June, with the bank looking to repossess your car, no working phone service and an irreparably damaged credit reputation. If we still had the consumption habits of our grandparents, we would be spending our savings now on food and possibly rent. Our spending habits have complicated the problem of debt.

I am a firm believer in capitalism, but it seems to have laid us a trap here. We borrow money to maintain lifestyles that cannot withstand situations of turmoil. We need to be producing all the time just to keep afloat. We must start becoming more intelligent with our spending, as that constitutes freedom rooted in stability. Expect to find your back to the wall when you spend money carelessly. The economy will probably resume its course eventually, but I sense this crisis will change our consumer habits for the better.



For the coming weeks, Worldcrunch will be delivering daily updates on the coronavirus pandemic from the best, most trusted international news sources — regardless of language or geography. To receive the daily Coronavirus global brief in your inbox, sign up here.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

France, Portrait Of A Nation In Denial — In Our World In Denial

The continuous increase of public debt and a tone-deaf president in France, the rise of authoritarian regimes elsewhere in the world, the blindness to global warming: realities that we do not want to see and that will end up destroying us if we do not act.

Photo of ​police forces in riot gear clashing with demonstrators as piles of garbage burn in Paris on March 23

Police forces clashing with demonstrators as piles of garbage burn in Paris on March 23

Les Echos

-Analysis-

PARIS — In France, the denial of reality seems to be the only thing that all of our public figures have in common: The president (who is right to say that it is his role to propose unpopular measures) refuses to see that other solutions than his own were possible and that institutions will not be sufficient in the long term to legitimize his solitary decisions.

The parliamentary opposition groups refuse to see that they do not constitute a political majority, since they would be incapable of governing together and that they have in common, for too many of them, on both sides of the political spectrum, left and right, only the hatred of money, the mistrust of success, and the contempt for excellence.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest