When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Geopolitics

Vaccine Nationalism: The Global Race For A COVID-19 Cure

There's a whole lot of money and prestige at stake as researchers across the globe scramble to develop a vaccine. Does this help or hurt the cause?

A volunteer from Wuhan during vaccine clinical trial
A volunteer from Wuhan during vaccine clinical trial
Philippe Escande

-Analysis-

PARIS — If you liked seeing countries, regions and cities battle it out for those precious shipments of masks and gowns, then you're going to love how the race for a vaccine plays out. But beware, this isn't a game for small players. We're no longer talking about protections made of paper and plastic, but about molecules, production plants, and tens of billions of dollars.

Paul Hudson, CEO of the French pharmaceutical laboratory Sanofi, offered up a taste of what's to come when, in a May 13 interview with Bloomberg, he acknowledged that if the vaccine his company is developing thanks to U.S. public funds is approved and produced in its five American factories, the product will logically be distributed first in the United States, before any other countries in the world.

French authorities don't seem to understand that logic. "For us it would be unacceptable that there should be a privileged access for this or that country based on some monetary pretext," said Agnès Pannier-Runacher, a top Economy Ministry official.

Hudson, an Englishman, made his remarks intentionally to warn Europeans about the fact that they are falling behind on this matter. What he was referring to is a deal that Sanofi concluded in February with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a U.S. government agency within the Department of Health and Human Services that is tasked with procuring countermeasures to health threats.

France and Europe do not have such a public tool, and did not respond, at that time, to the coronavirus crisis in the same way. Sanofi was careful to point out, however, that it has since started "very constructive discussions with EU authorities as well as with the French and German governments, among others." Better late than never.

Researchers across the globe scramble to develop a vaccine — Photo: Cadu Rolim/Fotoarena/ZUMA

In the field of vaccines, quick and massive actions are the key. That means setting up production plants during the research phase, before even knowing if the product will be effective. Sometimes things don't pan out, as Sanofi recalls after investing 300 million euros renovating a factory in Neuville-sur-Saône, near Lyon, to produce a vaccine against dengue fever that did not deliver. In the case of the COVID-19, investments will be even more significant.

The French government's anger over Hudson's comments was understandable on a moral level, but also somewhat hypocritical. Monetary terms matter, and nationalism too. France proved that when it requisitioned its masks.


It's also true that the United States isn't the only country playing the national priority game. The UK reached a similar agreement with the multinational pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca. China is also going on the offensive — and not just to protect its population. It also wants to prove its technological superiority to the world.

Of the approximately 100 vaccines currently in development across the world, a dozen, including four Chinese vaccines, are being clinically tested.

The stakes are geopolitical, in other words, as China and the United States continue ratcheting up their cold war. In the meantime, Europe is urging an approach that fewer and fewer seem to support: multilateralism.

In the case of vaccines, there is one compelling argument in favor of the European position. And it has both a moral and economic component: As long as all the countries around the world, and especially the poorest, are not immunized, the virus will continue to spread.

Collective interest vs personal interest. The European Commission has supervised a conference of contributors who raised $7.4 billion to design and deliver vaccines, particularly in poor countries. A glimmer of hope for the first victims of the new vaccination nationalism.


For the coming weeks, Worldcrunch will be delivering daily updates on the coronavirus pandemic from the best, most trusted international news sources — regardless of language or geography. To receive the daily Coronavirus global brief in your inbox, sign up here.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest