When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Economy

Why Europe's Economy Still Can't Seduce Investors

In front of Milan's Borsa Italiana stock exchange
In front of Milan's Borsa Italiana stock exchange
Justina Lee

Spare a thought for the globe-trotting European stock salesman.

Europe's equities have seen 25 straight weeks of fund outflows, according to Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, wiping out all of 2017's inflows. It's the only region recording meaningful outflows this year — even emerging markets, performing far worse, can't make that claim.

So why can't Europe get any love?

The push factors are obvious: From Brexit to the Italian budget, Europe is still a continent that has a reputation for in-fighting for global investors. At the same time, the pull factors are lacking: Economic and earnings growth is decent but unimpressive and subject to the vagaries of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policy. And there are no technology giants even buzz-worthy enough for an acronym.

"We've had a lot of bumps in the road in Europe," said Edmund Shing, global head of equity and derivative strategy at BNP Paribas SA in London. Investors "just get a bit tired of it."

Europe is not relevant or particularly interesting.

But it's not always fair. "People sometimes paint too broad a brush-stroke in terms of Europe," he added. "There are some very strong stories."

Foreign cash matters, because global investors are often the marginal buyers of European stocks, since domestic investors put less money into equities than their American peers, Shing said. Global funds account for 24% of European stocks, whereas in the U.S., they own 15%, according to a Barclays report.

Investment performance, especially after conversion to the strengthening dollar, justifies the lack of enthusiasm, at least to an extent: "Europe is not relevant or particularly interesting," said Peter Garnry, head of equity strategy at Saxo Bank A/S in Hellerup, Denmark. With a weak financial sector and a nearly non-existent technology industry, Europe's equity brand is "damaged," he added. Queries he receives from clients outside the region are mostly about U.S. technology and Chinese stocks — not Europe.

Another thing that doesn't help is the chronic under-performance of value strategies. European shares tend to be seen as value investments in the U.S., BNP's Shing said, and global value stocks are close to the lowest they've been versus growth stocks since 2000.

Then there's trade. Even after a brief detente reached with the EU in late July, U.S. President Donald Trump said Thursday the bloc's trade practices are "almost as bad as China." He had earlier threatened to raise tariffs on European car imports.

A car assembly line in Ningbo, China — Photo: Huang Zongzhi/Xinhua/ZUMA

But not all hope is lost.

Remember last year? Money flooded into European equities when it was clear that the centrist Emmanuel Macron would win the French election. There may not be a similar knight in shining armor this year, but for inflows to revive, Italy has to first avoid a collision course with the EU over its budget. Then there are the Brexit talks where, even in the critical final phase, the outcome remains uncertain.

To global investors, Brexit is not just a matter of currency volatility, but also a systemic issue with contagion risks across Europe, said Emmanuel Cau, head of European equity strategy at Barclays in London.

"If you get fairly smooth budget negotiations in the next few weeks in Italy, that might help flows to find a floor," he said. "The biggest one is still Brexit, and I do think a lot of investors would be on the sidelines until they have clarity."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Green

Forest Networks? Revisiting The Science Of Trees And Funghi "Reaching Out"

A compelling story about how forest fungal networks communicate has garnered much public interest. Is any of it true?

Thomas Brail films the roots of a cut tree with his smartphone.

Arborist and conservationist Thomas Brail at a clearcutting near his hometown of Mazamet in the Tarn, France.

Melanie Jones, Jason Hoeksema, & Justine Karst

Over the past few years, a fascinating narrative about forests and fungi has captured the public imagination. It holds that the roots of neighboring trees can be connected by fungal filaments, forming massive underground networks that can span entire forests — a so-called wood-wide web. Through this web, the story goes, trees share carbon, water, and other nutrients, and even send chemical warnings of dangers such as insect attacks. The narrative — recounted in books, podcasts, TV series, documentaries, and news articles — has prompted some experts to rethink not only forest management but the relationships between self-interest and altruism in human society.

But is any of it true?

The three of us have studied forest fungi for our whole careers, and even we were surprised by some of the more extraordinary claims surfacing in the media about the wood-wide web. Thinking we had missed something, we thoroughly reviewed 26 field studies, including several of our own, that looked at the role fungal networks play in resource transfer in forests. What we found shows how easily confirmation bias, unchecked claims, and credulous news reporting can, over time, distort research findings beyond recognition. It should serve as a cautionary tale for scientists and journalists alike.

First, let’s be clear: Fungi do grow inside and on tree roots, forming a symbiosis called a mycorrhiza, or fungus-root. Mycorrhizae are essential for the normal growth of trees. Among other things, the fungi can take up from the soil, and transfer to the tree, nutrients that roots could not otherwise access. In return, fungi receive from the roots sugars they need to grow.

As fungal filaments spread out through forest soil, they will often, at least temporarily, physically connect the roots of two neighboring trees. The resulting system of interconnected tree roots is called a common mycorrhizal network, or CMN.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest