When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Economy

Will COVID's Boost For Labor Unions Last? Check The Swedish Model

The pandemic has spurred a resurgence in labor unions around the world. But their return to prominence also raises the question of whether they’re the best way to protect workers in a globalized world.

Will COVID's Boost For Labor Unions Last? Check The Swedish Model

Food Distribution In Massachusetts

Carl Johan-Karlsson

Unions around the world have been on a steady decline over the last half-century: crippled by globalized economics and confounded by the accelerating changes in our work culture, average trade union membership in OECD countries has fallen from 30% in 1985 to 16% today. In the U.S., one-third of workers belonged to a labor union in the 1950s — a far cry from today’s 10.7%, including a meager 6.4% of private-sector workers.

A pandemic was bound to shake the status quo for the world of labor: from a newfound appreciation for what we’ve come to call “essential” workers to a series of layoffs in other sectors to the Great Resignation, which saw individuals reassess what they really want from their career.


But the uncertainty of COVID-19 has also made the imperative to protect workers undeniable — and unions across much of the Western world are doing their best to ride the wave.

The rise and fall and rise of organized labor

In Spain, unions have organized to protect the health of employees returning to work. In Belgium, collective labor agreements were signed last year to deal with suspensions of work contracts. In Denmark, union and business groups have led the way in negotiating wage compensation and job preservation schemes. In France, unions spanning the political spectrum banded together in January to stage a school workers strike of historic magnitude. And in the U.S., where Joe Biden has pledged to be “the most pro-union president you’ve ever seen,” union approval reached 68% in 2021 — the highest on record since 1965.

The Swedish system has been labeled in America as “socialism”

But with their return to prominence also come questions of whether old-style labor unions are actually the right mechanism to ensure the best conditions for workers, with the debate evermore divided along partisan lines. In the U.S., a 2021 Pew survey shows that 74% of Democrats now say labor unions have a positive effect on the country, up from 66% in August 2019. The share of Republicans and GOP leaners who say unions have a positive effect has fallen from 44% to 34% during the same period.

The most union-dense place in the world

And yet, as critics voice concerns over labor market rigidities and hampered employment rates, one of the union-densest places in the world, Sweden, tells a very different story.

More than eight decades ago, a treaty was signed in Sweden. Following pressure from the ruling Social Democratic Party to resolve market conflicts over wages and rights, Sweden’s employers’ federation and the rapidly growing workers’ union federation signed a historical treaty that remains the basis of the country’s industrial culture today.

What became known as the Saltjsöbaden Agreements of 1938 cemented the Swedish social norm that employers and workers will conclude agreements without interference by the government. That policy is still in effect, which is why, for example, Sweden still has no minimum wage today.

As such, the Swedish system, which has typically been labeled in America as “socialism,” is actually a form of corporatism – the organization of society by professional groups, such as agricultural, labor, scientific or guild associations.

Signing the Saltjsöbaden Agreements in 1938

Lars Olsson

Sweden isn't a welfare state

The Saltsjöbaden Agreement garnered attention from the outside world as it ushered in a Swedish era marked by decades of economic growth, improved living standards and minimal industrial conflicts. And it also created — for good and bad — a national culture centered on the importance of hard work and pulling one’s own weight.

In that sense, Sweden isn’t a welfare state in the American meaning; the social contract isn’t about charity but about the freedom of the individual, social contribution and reciprocity — where you work and pay your taxes in exchange for your freedom. From a U.S. political perspective, that is closer to the Republican party line than the Democratic one.

Unions have struggled to figure out where they fit into this new globalized era

It should be said that the now famed “Swedish model of agreement” took root in the special context of post-War economic boom years, in a small country largely untouched by the ideological tides that divided 20th-century Europe. It’s also a fact that Swedish unions, too, have lost much of the vigor that allowed them to transform the country into a model for pragmatic progressives around the world.

Unions in a globalized world

Indeed, after the Social Democratic party’s grip on Swedish politics started to slacken in the mid-1970s, unions have struggled to figure out where they fit into this new globalized era, and repeatedly missed opportunities to regain their relevance — a ripe example being their feeble efforts to negotiate fair labor conditions with tech giants like Facebook and Amazon.

Still, the last two years saw an increase in Swedish union membership — reversing a 25-year trend. That also comes at a time when the European left is experiencing something of a revival — with social democrats having secured victories in numerous countries in the last few years, including Norway, Denmark, Germany and Portugal.

Today, the question is whether progressive parties will also manage to re-establish a connection to the organized labor that was once considered the bedrock of their politics.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

The potential sabotage has raised the question of the vulnerabilities of European pipelines

Christian Bueger

Whatever caused the damage to the Nord Stream gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, it appears to be the first major attack on critical “subsea” (underwater) infrastructure in Europe. It’s now widely thoughtnot least by Nato – that the explosions that led to major leaks in the two pipelines were not caused by accidents.

The alliance says they were a deliberate act of sabotage.

The attacks occurred in the exclusive economic zones of Denmark and Sweden and demonstrate the risks that Europe’s subsea infrastructures are facing. This raises the question of the vulnerabilities of European pipelines, electricity and internet cables, and other maritime infrastructure. Europe will have to revisit its policies for protecting them.

But it is still unclear how the attacks were carried out. The investigations will probably take months to complete. Still, there are two likely scenarios.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ