When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
China

China’s Growing Companies Need Maturity, Not Just Money

Chinese business leaders should learn lessons from Japanese firms' spending sprees of the 1980s and 1990s.

Sinopec is China's largest company
Sinopec is China's largest company

BEIJING — There's a reason analysts talk so much these days about "Chinese capital," which continues to make its presence felt as top companies in China begin to buy their way into new markets.

In 2015, according to government figures released last week, Chinese companies carried out 579 overseas mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in 62 countries and regions for a transaction total of $54.4 billion. China's foreign investment, in the meantime, hit a record high of $145.7 billion, accounting for 9.9% of global traffic and ranking second in the world.

The trend stems from economic reforms in recent decades that allowed Chinese companies to amass substantial amounts of capital. That, in turn, prompted them to seek even greater sources of wealth through overseas investments and acquisitions.

As part of the "new normal" for China's economy, many companies believe the best way to transform and upgrade themselves is by grafting together global resources and the country's aggregate financial strength. This implies seeking out successful brands, networks, technologies and services on a global level. In doing so, these companies hope not only to better serve the growing Chinese middle class, but to seize the future of China's economy.

Their choice is the right one. This process will no doubt give rise to a number of world-class Chinese enterprises, and not all of them from the giant state-owned businesses. In 2015, non-state-owned enterprises outranked the state-owned enterprises in terms of foreign M&A and in the amount of capital involved.

These deals include manufacturing, information technology, finance and even culture, sports and entertainment industries. Chinese "smart manufacturing" and services already play a previously unimagined role in the global picture. And this trend will continue.

The "GE approach"

But M&A deals have always been a double-edged sword. Thus the term "winner's curse," in reference to how operational pressures increase with each M&A. As companies grow, they gain more assets, but they are also more unwieldy, eventually collapsing in some cases. As international cases show, 70% of these deals do not meet expectations. The success rate of cross-border acquisitions is even lower.

China ushered in overseas M&A for the first time in 2008. But a lot of blind bargain-hunting by enterprises did not result in the cheap resources and minerals they were hoping for. Instead, they lost. Some of these deals ended up as costly dead-ends. Enthusiasm for overseas M&A waned as a result.

Starting in 2012, however, the pace picked up again. These days, Chinese companies are again eager for new opportunities. They're also more cautious, albeit not necessarily more successful.

Generally speaking, Chinese overseas corporate deals are resource-oriented. Apart from resources like minerals, oil or gas, they mostly seek intangible assets, brands, R&D capabilities, technology or patents. Rarely, though, do they take what Professor Ding Yuan of the China Europe International Business School calls the "GE approach." They don't, in other words, try to exert total control over their partners and acquisitions and impose completely new management.

Ding Yuan sees that as a problem: Without first-class management, how can Chinese companies and the companies they merge with to achieve win-win situations?

Risk assessment

Another problem is that while Chinese companies often have leverage power to execute M&A, they're sometimes reluctant to continue investing afterwards. They use their capital advantage up front, in other words, but not necessarily over the long-term. And as the cash flow dries up, some of the mergers and acquisitions end up failing.

[rebelmouse-image 27090492 alt="""" original_size="500x375" expand=1]

Hold on to your yuans — Photo: Mulligan Stu

Many Chinese enterprises are still absolute beginners in this kind of deal. Their inexperienced means more uncertainty, and probably more risks. As one official of the Ministry of Commerce pointed out, certain Chinese companies go into their M&A deals almost blind. Often they're driven by non-rational factors, like following a trend or just showing off, according to the source. In those cases, success is more of an accident than a probability.

The official's analysis brings to mind the lessons learned from Japanese companies that spent lavishly, proud to be buying up the whole of America, only to see the bubble eventually burst. Where are those companies today?

That's not to say Chinese should avoid overseas M&A. It's a necessary step forward, one that inevitably comes with risk. With careful planning, however, some of that risk can be mitigated, allowing certain Chinese companies will break the "winner's curse."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest