When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Italy

What A German Dreams For Italy

(Hint: it won't ever come true)

It looks so good...
It looks so good...
Stefan Ulrich

-Essay-

This was the dream: Italy’s citizens honor Mario Monti’s commitment to reform and Monti’s party becomes the strongest in Parliament. With the moderate left under Pierluigi Bersani, it forms a stable government that continues on the path of reform. Meanwhile, Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement comes in third, and as the opposition keeps pumping for reform. In the doghouse sits Silvio Berlusconi, who ruined Italy economically, politically and morally.

Berlin, and in fact the whole European Union, were dreaming this dream because it’s in their interests for Italy to do well. And now for the brutal wake-up to reality: only one Italian in 10 voted for Monti. The elections were an opera buffa, but a truly unfunny comic opera. A cunning faun, half-human, half-goat, and a fulminating clown were the surprise winners.

Berlusconi and his coalition are now nearly as strong as the left in parliament. Grillo’s party got more votes than any other single party, with Bersani and Berlusconi both relying on allied parties. Together, Berlusconi and Grillo, both of whom rail against the EU, took 55% of the vote. Monti and Bersani cannot govern. It’s not only a disaster for Italy, it’s a disaster for Europe.

Why are the Italians doing this to themselves and the continent? One possible reason is that many Italians simply no longer believe in the state and the common good. Their hopes for change have been dashed for decades. Whether they voted Christian Democrat, Communist, Berlusconi or the reform-minded left, not much changed in the inflated, ineffective, and corrupt party state – except that taxes went up.

Facing frustration with their own country, Italians used to turn to Europe. No other people was as gung-ho as they were about the EU. But Italians no longer perceive Brussels as an anchor, but rather just a sinker, pulling Italy down.

Monti’s reforms have made the lives of many Italians worse, at least for now. Young people still have trouble finding fixed employment. Older people can barely manage on their pensions. The economy is in recession. The German “reform realism” that imbues the EU is seen as a hostile diktat.

To many Italians, the cure was worse than the disease, and Monti and Bersani – and Berlin and Brussels with them – were unable to make them see it differently.

Old fights, new beginnings

People everywhere who feel their situation is hopeless are attracted by demagogues. Berlusconi embodies the cynicism of the disappointed, the “it’s okay to do whatever you have to to make a few euros” kind of cynicism. Before the elections, he promised Italians they would be reimbursed billions in tax money. There’s a name for promises like that: buying votes.

Grillo on the other hand is the Utopian, the great cleaner-out of the Augean stables, the New Beginnings man.

These elections also mark a change of system for Italy. The First Republic after the war was dominated by the Christian Democrats who allied with small parties and governed from the middle. That system gradually succumbed to corruption. In the early 1990s Berlusconi came along and promised a better Second Republic, a U.S.-style bipartisan system that would alternate between the right and the left, and in so doing, strengthen Italy. The idea wasn’t bad, but it failed.

Historically, Italy has tended to a kind of angry dualism: Guelphs vs Ghibellines, Don Camillo vs Peppone, North vs South, Lazio vs Roma soccer rivalry. Now the Berlusconi bloc and the left are facing off, and both of them have a major weakness: Berlusconi is clearly not about reforms, but rather his own power and business interests; and the left is prey to constant bickering within its own ranks.

The Third Republic shows an Italy divided in three: Berlusconi’s right, Bersani’s left and Grillo’s angry men. For Italy to have a government, two of the big three have to form a coalition – something that’s difficult to impossible right now. The left can never trust Berlusconi, and he’s more unpresentable than ever at the European level.

Grillo on the other hand has made it clear he thinks all the others are corrupt deadbeats. Nobody really knows what his party stands for. Yet a fast return to the polls serves nothing if election laws aren’t changed beforehand. And the parties would have to agree on that.

So, right now, Italy seems ungovernable.

Maybe something else is possible: maybe the Grillo movement’s parliament members and the parliament members on the left will discover they have something in common: the well-being of Italy. Maybe Grillo’s angry men will morph into citizen-friendly reformers and govern with the moderate left. That would cut Berlusconi off from power and maybe he could even – finally – be brought to justice! But we're dreaming again...

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Why The U.S. Lost Its Leverage In The Middle East — And May Never Get It Back

In the Israel-Hamas war, Qatar now plays the key role in negotiations, while the United States appears increasingly disengaged. Shifts in the region and beyond require that Washington move quickly or risk ceding influence to China and others for the long term.

Photograph of U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken  shaking hands with sraeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

November 30, 2023, Tel Aviv, Israel: U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken shakes hands with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Chuck Kennedy/U.S State/ZUMA
Sébastien Boussois

-Analysis-

PARIS — Upon assuming office in 2008, then-President Barack Obama declared that United States would gradually begin withdrawing from various conflict zones across the globe, initiating a complex process that has had a major impact on the international landscape ever since.

This started with the American departure from Iraq in 2010, and was followed by Donald Trump's presidency, during which the "Make America Great Again" policy redirected attention to America's domestic interests.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

The withdrawal trend resumed under Joe Biden, who ordered the exit of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021. To maintain a foothold in all intricate regions to the east, America requires secure and stable partnerships. The recent struggle in addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict demonstrates that Washington increasingly relies on the allied Gulf states for any enduring influence.

Since the collapse of the Camp David Accords in 1999 during Bill Clinton's tenure, Washington has consistently supported Israel without pursuing renewed peace talks that could have led to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

While President Joe Biden's recent challenges in pushing for a Gaza ceasefire met with resistance from an unyielding Benjamin Netanyahu, they also stem from the United States' overall disengagement from the issue over the past two decades. Biden now is seeking to re-engage in the Israel-Palestine matter, yet it is Qatar that is the primary broker for significant negotiations such as the release of hostages in exchange for a ceasefire —a situation the United States lacks the leverage to enforce.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest