When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
Vote counting for the referendum on a new Constitution in Tunisia​

Vote counting for the referendum on a new Constitution in Tunisia

Johannes Jauhiainen

Modern Tunisia has adopted three different constitutions. The first two were linked to proud moments in the nation’s history: independence from France in 1956, and the fruit of the 2011 Arab Spring pro-democracy movement that ousted strongman President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who had ruled the country for almost 24 years.

The adoption of a third constitution, which Tunisians were called to vote on in a referendum on Monday, has been a very different story. Though exit polls report that more than 90% of those voting approved the new constitution, the referendum saw a low turnout of just above 30% after the major political parties boycotted the vote.

Still, with no minimum turnout required or expected legal challenges to the referendum results, by Saturday Tunisia is set to be governed by the new constitution when the final results of the referendum are announced.

Indeed, events are moving fast in the nation where the Arab Spring began. The previous constitution was introduced in 2014, having taken two years to draft with the input of numerous scholars and civil society organizations, and credited for setting up a parliamentary-presidential system that ushered in a new era of democracy that ensured Tunisia would not end up ruled by one person.

Consolidation of power

The new constitution was instead drafted in just one month behind closed doors, the exclusive project of the current president Kais Saied.

The former professor of law, who took over the presidency in 2019, has pushed the new constitution as part of an ongoing consolidation of power that he says is necessary to overcome the parliament’s political gridlock and accelerate much needed reforms.

Saied denies any authoritarian ambitions, declaring on the day of the referendum that the new constitution represents the democratic power of the people as understood by French Enlightenment philosophers Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu. Critics worry the inspiration comes from the more recent past: pre-Arab Spring Tunisia.

Chilling message

Mondher Belhaj Ali, a former member of parliament and lawyer has stated that the new constitution fails to separate the executive branch from the legislative branch, potentially concentrating massive power in the hands of the president.

Amnesty International has expressed similar worries, noting that lack of judicial independence is a threat to human rights. “The proposed draft dismantles many of the safeguards provided in Tunisia’s post-revolution Constitution and fails to provide institutional guarantees for human rights,” said Heba Morayef, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa. “Removing these safeguards sends a chilling message and sets back years of efforts to strengthen human rights protection in Tunisia.”

Hamadi Rédissi, Professor in Political Science at the University of Tunis, interviewed by Tunisian news site Kapitalis, said the proposed constitution risks seeing the country “sliding towards a dictatorship.”

\u200bTunisian President Kais Saied

Tunisian President Kais Saied


Stronger place for Islam  

Despite its shortcomings under what's been called the "presidential dictatorship" of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who wound up dying in exile in 2019, Tunisia has been considered a regional model for a secular and modern state. For example, the Code of Personal Status in Tunisia introduced in 1956 laid out a foundation for women’s rights including marriage rights and abolishing polygamy.

The proposed constitution risks seeing the country “sliding towards a dictatorship."

The constitution of 2014 started with an article declaring Tunisia to be a free and sovereign nation with Islam as its religion. This article has often been cited as a guarantee of the state’s secular character.

The new constitution would instead give emphasis to the role of religion by rooting Tunisia in the Islamic Umma or community. It also declares that the state must pursue religious values while leaving out previous mentions of Tunisia as a civil state.

From parliamentary to presidential system  

In the year leading up to the referendum, Tunisia had gotten a taste of where decision-making power may be headed. Since Saied put a freeze on Parliament’s work in 2021, he has ruled mainly by decree.

Civil society groups and activists have been limited as the President has extended the state of emergency, which limits the freedom of assembly. And as there was no functioning constitutional court, there was no way to challenge the legality of the President’s actions.

While the new constitution appears to simply be a way to formalize Saied’s reforms and power grabs that were carried out in a legally dubious manner, French daily Le Monde notes that his increasing grip on power is also a sign of the political failures of the past decade, “the product of an immense disenchantment that has affected the very idea of democracy and rehabilitated the myth of the providential savior.”

But Le Monde also warns that Saied should not take the referendum victory as a “blank check” to take total power. The Arab Spring may be over, but he should remember how it ended for the last president who behaved like a dictator.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Frozen In Time: A Rare Look At Life In Mariupol Under Russian Occupation

Russian occupation authorities promised to rebuild housing in Mariupol by winter, but in reality, thousands of people face the cold in largely destroyed houses and apartments. Mariupol residents told Vazhnyye Istorii about how they are surviving as winter falls.

Photo of an apartment building in Mariupol damaged by war

An apartment building damaged by shelling in Mariupol

Important Stories

Russian troops shelled Mariupol for more than two months straight, and fully occupied it by May. The Kremlin needed the city to provide a land link to annexed Crimea. It is still unknown how many people have died in the city of approximately half a million people in peacetime.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

In May, Ukraine reported at least 25,000 dead but the number could be much higher. Many are buried under rubble or in mass graves, and countless others reported missing.

Up to 90% of high-rise buildings and 60% of private homes have been damaged or destroyed. Nevertheless, there are still about 100,000 people in the occupied city. Many of them have no electricity, heat, water, or sewage. People live without utilities, with tape covering broken windows, and are freezing in their homes in the absence of promised aid that Russia has failed to deliver.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest