When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

True Fiction

True Fiction: When President Trump Meets President Macron

It's October 2017. The spring's French presidential elections had been won by a fresh-faced 'Anti-Trump.' Now it's time for the two men to meet.


The cards for the French presidential election were drastically reshuffled after center-right candidate François Fillon found himself embroiled in an embezzlement scandal. Meanwhile, following the decision by current center-left President François Hollande not to stand for a second term, his Socialist party elected an inexperienced and quasi-utopian Benoît Hamon as its candidate.

As a result, on April 23, the run-off that many insiders expected came true: For the first time in the more than half-century history of the Fifth Republic, the top two vote-getters in the first round of the French presidential election belong to neither of the country's traditional Left or Right parties. Newcomer Emmanuel Macron, 39, of the brand new En Marche ! party came in first with 23.7% of the vote, while Marine Le Pen of the National Front party (founded by her father) collected 21.5% of ballots. All the French drama, of course, comes after two of the most shocking election results in memory: the Brexit vote and Donald Trump's victory. So all eyes now shift to France to see what modern democracy holds in store for us next — and who will "wish la bienvenue" when President Trump comes marching into Paris for the first time ...

To whet the world's appetite, we have imagined two very different scenarios of how it all could look, sound and smell after the French voters have their say in the second round of the French presidential election next month.

October 7, 2017*

They called him the anti-Trump. And indeed, in many respects, he was. Emmanuel Macron, the youngest president in French history, against the oldest American ever to take over the White House. A former Rothschild banker, a young wolf of the finance world, contrasted with a real-estate mogul who got his start in the outer New York borough of Queens and made his money with bricks and mortar. Macron, the polished purveyor of 21st century globalism — a response to Trump's raw nationalistic rhetoric of isolationism.

But the two also had a lot in common. Like Trump, Macron won by positioning himself outside of the political party system and by describing himself as anti-establishment, while being its most accomplished embodiment. Like Trump, he inherited a divided country, beset by an identity crisis and growing inequalities. Like Trump, he saw politics essentially as a game of taking risks and striking deals. And before they met for the first time on the porch of the Elysée palace, both men were very much aware that their poker match was only just beginning.

Of course, Macron had been generous, though always cautious, in his criticism of the man in the White House during his successful campaign. The French and European media had been particularly enchanted when their blue-eyed boy joked that "the best way for Trump to keep buying his Italian suits is to work together with the EU. We can even find one that fits him better!"

Obviously, Trump didn't let the quip stand, replying in a tweet sent at 2.54 a.m. (that's 8:54 a.m. Paris time. Perfect!) "You're right Froggy. From now on, only American suits!"

The whole thing seemed to have been forgotten by the time the American president made his first visit to Paris, on a particularly hot weekend in early October. The two heads of state did their best to appear courteous in front of the cameras, though Trump's body language suggested he was very much enjoying towering over his 5-foot-7-inch French counterpart. Inevitably, the "was it a gaffe or is he a bully?" moment came when Trump mistook Macron's 63-year-old wife for his mother. Answer, by the way: He is a bully.

Trump clearly had hoped for Marine Le Pen to defeat Macron in the second round of the election. But after the results had come in, showing the Front National leader below 45%, he tried to convince himself that he could just as well take advantage of the young Frenchman's lack of experience and vision. He was both right and wrong.

Macron, who was more interested in boosting economic integration than flexing diplomatic muscles, was indeed willing to compromise. He was ready to stand aside on the dismantling of NATO if it was an opportunity to reinforce the European Union. Brussels could finally build a common European defense system to replace NATO, and the EU would double down on economic integration, especially now that Britain was leaving. It would thus open the door, reasoned the young French president, who was acting in concert with the recently reelected Angela Merkel, to rekindling the EU's free-trade talks with the U.S.

Their contempt for one another was only matched by their mutual admiration, from one money man to another

Macron's big idea was that since Trump was so intent on re-industrializing America, the EU — and France in particular — should go the opposite direction and fully embrace the "uberization" of the economy. By canceling the country's 35-hour working week and encouraging freelancing, even while slashing corporate and wealth taxes, Macron had already discarded the French labor movement he'd used to keep Le Pen from power. It was the groundwork necessary to attract investors and tech companies, worried by the U.S. Muslim ban and the rising tensions between Washington and Beijing. Meanwhile, the Macron-Merkel "Macrel" couple was also initiating similar free-trade negotiations with China and other Asian countries in the hope of turning Europe into the world's hub for freelance services. A launching pad for the rare winners of globalization, a ticket toward a new kind of underclass for the rest.

Increasingly pragmatic, Trump saw real opportunity, confident that the biggest American corporations would rather repatriate their overseas funds, thanks to his one-off tax holiday, than move to France — especially after the latest terror attack. By the end of the not-so-romantic weekend in Paris, their contempt for one another was only matched by their mutual admiration, from one money man to another. The leaders of U.S. and France, and more widely Europe, were now fully aware that they no longer shared the same interests and goals. All seemed willing to each go their own way. This new reality of transatlantic relations was confirmed days later, after Trump's awkward and shortened visit to Berlin where, among other things, he complained about the food and the mass street protests. History notes that he wouldn't return to either of these capitals until the middle of his second term, after both Macron and Merkel had been defeated.

*True Fiction: A narrative experiment for an era of fake news and hard-to-believe reality. (This piece was published on Feb. 2, 2017)

Read part II of this series: When President Trump Meets President Le Pen.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Smaller Allies Matter: Afghanistan Offers Hard Lessons For Ukraine's Future

Despite controversies at home, Nordic countries were heavily involved in the NATO-led war in Afghanistan. As the Ukraine war grinds on, lessons from that conflict are more relevant than ever.

Photo of Finnish Defence Forces in Afghanistan

Finnish Defence Forces in Afghanistan

Johannes Jauhiainen


HELSINKI — In May 2021, the Taliban took back power in Afghanistan after 20 years of international presence, astronomical sums of development aid and casualties on all warring sides.

As Kabul fell, a chaotic evacuation prompted comparisons to the fall of Saigon — and most of the attention was on the U.S., which had led the original war to unseat the Taliban after 9/11 and remained by far the largest foreign force on the ground. Yet, the fall of Kabul was also a tumultuous and troubling experience for a number of other smaller foreign countries who had been presented for years in Afghanistan.

In an interview at the time, Antti Kaikkonen, the Finnish Minister of Defense, tried to explain what went wrong during the evacuation.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

“Originally we anticipated that the smaller countries would withdraw before the Americans. Then it became clear that getting people to the airport had become more difficult," Kaikkonen said. "So we decided last night to bring home our last soldiers who were helping with the evacuation.”

During the 20-year-long Afghan war, the foreign troop presence included many countries:Finland committed around 2,500 soldiers,Sweden 8,000,Denmark 12,000 and Norway 9,000. And in the nearly two years since the end of the war, Finland,Belgium and theNetherlands have commissioned investigations into their engagements in Afghanistan.

As the number of fragile or failed states around the world increases, it’s important to understand how to best organize international development aid and the security of such countries. Twenty years of international engagement in Afghanistan offers valuable lessons.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest