Tired Of Playing Nice, Russian Protesters Ready To Defy Police

Vladimir Putin's victory in the presidential elections has not deterred opponents, some of whom have also faced arrests by authorities. And now, as plans begin for the next major rally, on May 5, protest organizers say they will ignore government

Protest organizers plan greater use of social networks. (akk_rus)
Protest organizers plan greater use of social networks. (akk_rus)
Grigorii Tymanov

MOSCOW - Vladimir Putin might have won the presidency, but the Russian opposition movement has not lost hope.

The movement "For Honest Elections' has just announced plans for a major march in May, shooting for as many as 1 million protesters, and most notably declaring that it would not limit itself to actions approved by Moscow's city government.

The idea to organize a "march of the millions' on May 5 came from "Left Front" leader Sergei Udaltsov. "We will have to just go out (in the streets), and not leave until a high-ranking official comes to talk with us," Udaltsov declared to Kommersant on Wednesday. "As we learned in the last protest, they just don't understand anything else."

On the next day, Thursday, he was sentenced to 10 days in jail for trying to organize an unsanctioned protest in Pushkin square after the protest on March 10.

Udaltsov's lawyer, Nikolai Polosov, told Kommersant he would appeal the ruling. Meanwhile, Udaltsov plans to go on a hunger strike. Another member of the planning committee for "For Honest Elections," Alexsei Navalni, was fined $34 on Thursday for his part in the protests on March 5, when the opposition refused to cut short a rally after the officially allowed time ran out. Navalni is also planning to appeal, and hold responsible the policemen who he says gave false testimony against him.

As a result of Thursday's courtroom rulings and "the regime's general attitude toward the protest movement," the opposition says it is forced to radically reevaluate its tactics regarding mass street protests. "In reality, the steering committee that organized the previous rallies has finished its work and is no longer necessary," Navalni said. "The previous system, where we always agreed with the city government on the time and place for the protests, does not work for us anymore. I do not see any use in continuing to negotiate with the city government."

No more negotiations

A source from the disbanded steering committee said the protest movement's planned course of action was already well known, and that "For Honest Elections' is already planning to "spread the word about the march route, tactics and possible consequences from the regime" via social networks and mass media.

"We don't want any violence, we just want to bring a million people into the streets - not to riot," the sources said. "We will control the crowds ourselves. We will notify the city authorities, but we will not negotiate with them."

Up to this point, the protest movement's tensest negotiations with Moscow authorities took place in the run-up to the March 5 rally. "For Honest Elections' wanted to hold a rally on the Lubyanka or Manezhnaya squares, but Moscow Vice-Mayor Aleksandr Gorbenko was only prepared to offer Bolotnaya square. After four days of arguments, the two sides agreed on a rally in Pushkin Square. The event ended with clashes with the police. The city let it be known later that they would take those clashes into consideration when considering future rallies. Even so, negotiations regarding the rally five days later, on March 10, were successfully concluded in 24 hours.

The Moscow city government did not comment on the opposition movement's announcement. Kremlin supporters announced that they were not yet planning any counter-protest in May. "The opposition's announcement that they would gather a million people is laughable. There were quite a bit fewer than that in the last rally," Mikhail Dukhovich, one of the pro-Kremlin movement's representatives told Kommersant.

Though they too doubted predictions of 1 million participants, Moscow police said that they were prepared for an unsanctioned rally in May. "If the event is authorized, than we will provide security for it," a police source said. "But if not, we will forcefully suppress it in strict accordance with the law."

Read the original article in Russian

Photo - akk_rus

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

A Mother In Spain Denied Child Custody Because She Lives In Rural Area

A court in Spain usurps custody of the one-year-old boy living with his mother in the "deep" part of the Galicia region, forced to instead live with his father in the southern city of Marbella, which the judge says is "cosmopolitan" with good schools and medical care. Women's rights groups have taken up the mother's case.

A child in Galician countryside

Laure Gautherin

A Spanish court has ordered the withdrawal of a mother's custody of her one-year-old boy because she is living in the countryside in northwestern Spain, where the judge says the child won't have "opportunities for the proper development of his personality."

The case, reported Monday in La Voz de Galicia, has sparked outrage from a women's rights association but has also set off reactions from politicians of different stripes across the province of Galicia, defending the values of rural life.

Judge María Belén Ureña Carazo, of the family court of Marbella, a city on the southern coast of 141,000 people, has ordered the toddler to stay with father who lives in the city rather than with his mother because she was living in "deep Galicia" where the child would lack opportunities to "grow up in a happy environment."

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - October 25, 2021

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - Monday 25 October, 2021

La Voz de Galicia

Better in a "cosmopolitan" city?

The judge said Marbella, where the father lives, was a "cosmopolitan city" with "a good hospital" as well as "all kinds of schools" and thus provided a better environment for the child to thrive.

The mother has submitted a formal complaint to the General Council of the Judiciary that the family court magistrate had acted with "absolute contempt," her lawyer told La Voz de Galicia.

The mother quickly accumulated support from local politicians and civic organizations. The Clara Campoamor association described the judge's arguments as offensive, intolerable and typical of "an ignorant person who has not traveled much."

The Xunta de Galicia, the regional government, has addressed the case, saying that any place in Galicia meets the conditions to educate a minor. The Socialist party politician Pablo Arangüena tweeted that "it would not hurt part of the judiciary to spend a summer in Galicia."

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!