When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Israel

The Politics Of The Palestinian Wedding Business

A mass wedding ceremony in Gaza, on April 11.
A mass wedding ceremony in Gaza, on April 11.
Dani Rubinstein

TEL AVIV — A whole lot of money is involved in the current Palestinian political struggles, with some suggesting that the ability to bring in the bucks is a non-official competition for the title to be the next president of the Palestinian authority. And no better way to judge that than to measure how notable weddings are being celebrated.

We see, for example, that the current president Mahmoud Abbas marked his 80th birthday by celebrating his eldest grandson's wedding in Qatar.

At the same time, Abbas's bitter rival Mohammed Dahlan was celebrating his daughter's wedding in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The wedding season of recent weeks in the Palestinian territories thus became a way for the two leaders to compete with each other for who will grant more money and sponsorship to the young newlyweds.

Clearly, it isn't their money. It is money raised from countries in the Middle East, the Gulf, and beyond. A month ago, for example, a huge ceremony was organized in Gaza, where 2,000 couples got married on a soccer field, all sponsored by Turkey. Every couple received $2,000.

According to Palestinian sources, Dahlan was the man behind this enormous event. He also donated $5,000 from the UAE to each family who lost a member in the war last summer. His wife, Jaleela, donated generously to public institutions in Gaza with Hamas' authorization. Analysts see these recent moves as a possibility that Dahlan is trying to reconcile with Hamas, which could undercut Abbas's rule in Ramallah.

The fattest check

Abbas responded to the mass soccer field wedding by organizing a ceremony where hundreds of couples got married in the sacred Al Aqsa square in Jerusalem, and went to Jericho to celebrate afterwards. The rings and the celebrations cost $4,000 per couple.

Mahmoud Abbas is a wealthy man who has property both in Qatar and Amman, the capital of Jordan. Five years ago, Dahlan openly accused him of corruption carried out through his sons' business. Similar accusations have been made against Dahlan. In his early years as head of preventive security in Gaza, he was accused of collecting protection money from every truck that entered Israel. It is also said that some of the funds given by the United States to fight Hamas went through him.

Hamas has banned Dahlan from Gaza, and in 2011 he was thrown out of Ramallah and expelled from the Fatah party that runs the West Bank. He owes his success to the leaders of the UAE, with whom he also helped invest billions of dollars in a project in Belgrade, Serbia. As recognition, Dahlan and his family and close associates were granted Serbian citizenship.

Dahlan has significant support in the Palestinian territories and in Gaza. Abbas suspects certain key players will cooperate politically with Dahlan, such as Salam Fayyad, the former prime minister in Ramallah up to 2013.

Last week, security forces in Ramallah raided the offices of the Fayyad's Association "Palestine Tomorrow," which had received millions of dollars in funding from the Gulf for projects in the West Bank. The suspicion: money laundering.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest