When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions supporters protest in London.
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions supporters protest in London.
David Refaeli

TEL AVIV — A summer of fighting in Gaza has reignited a wave of global protests against Israel. Companies operating in Israel — such as maritime cargo giant Zim and major food producers — are finding themselves under attack. But they are fighting back.

"The move to a sweeping boycott of anything Israeli, the violence and mainly the anti-Semitic remarks often heard reveal the true face of the BDS movement Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions," says Amir Ofek, director of the Israeli foreign ministry"s civil society department.

"This is not a one-sided game," he says. "Anyone calling for a boycott will find themselves publicly and politically targeted."

For example, he recalls a British theater that refused to host a Jewish film festival because of "support from the Israeli embassy." What followed were demonstrations, the withdrawal of donations, aggressive media and messages from the corridors of power. "It proved to them they had made a mistake," Ofek says. "This trend will keep intensifying. We will work vigorously to make it clear to those calling for boycott that there is a price to pay."

Three weeks ago, pro-Palestinian activists in the U.S. began organizing to prevent a Zim vessel from offloading in the port of Oakland, California. On their Facebook page, they characterized themselves as "a coalition of activists calling for a siege on Israeli Zim vessels in solidarity with the Palestinian people." They added that as long as Gaza is under a maritime siege, Israeli sea transport should be targeted.

A similar protest took place in 2010 after Israel's raid on the Mavi Marmara flotilla. Nearly 500 demonstrators had managed to prevent a Zim ship from offloading in the Oakland port for 24 hours by creating a human wall preventing port workers from reaching the vessel.

This time, Zim was prepared, and the arrival time of its vessel last Saturday was repeatedly changed, so as to confuse the protestors. After several attempted delays, the rally eventually took place without the ship. "Even the delay is a victory," says Mohamed Shehk, one of the organizers. "We estimate Zim's loss at $22 million per day of delay."

"We are familiar with these boycotts," says Avi Levy, chairman of Israel's Naval Officers Union. "It started after the Marmara flotilla. At the time, Zim ships were not allowed in South Africa and other places."

Protestors are now preparing to prevent other Zim vessels from landing in the Washington state ports of Tacoma and Seattle this week. They also hope they can thwart their arrivals in Vancouver, Canada, in a bid to completely block the Israeli company from offloading anywhere on the American West Coast.

"The company works in full cooperation with the local authorities in full confidence in their ability to ensure the regular operations of Zim vessles," the company has said in a statement.

European protests

In the UK and Ireland, local initiatives against Israeli goods are also on the rise. A week ago, SuperValu, Ireland's largest supermarket chain, ordered the managers of its 232 branches to take Israeli products off the shelves. But the next day, the company reversed course. "SuperValu is not involved in a boycott of Israeli produce," and has a policy "of not taking a position on international affairs," a statement from the chain said. But it didn't deny the initial order of removing Israeli products.

In Belfast, protestors filmed their removal of Israeli goods from the shelves of Sainsbury's and Asda supermarkets, and the YouTube videos have since become viral.

A Tesco supermarket in Birmingham was vandalized last Saturday when about 100 people entered the store, threw Israeli products on the floor and shouted at staffers and customers.

Madate Trade Union in Ireland has issued a petition calling for boycotting Israeli products, thus joining Unite, the largest union in the UK, which had already issued a similar call.

In Dublin, a branch of Ireland's largest toy store chain Smyths erected a sign saying that Israeli-made products from companies such as Diamant Toys had been removed. The chain's management says it was a local initiative by store employees, and the sign has since been removed.

"It started after images of the destruction in Gaza were aired on Irish TV," says Kobi Diamant, one of the owners of Diamant Toys. "I took it badly because I know the owners of the chain. I called him on the phone, and it turned out he wasn't even aware of this, so the next day the products were already back. This move should be praised, but unfortunately, on the ground a reduction in sales is already felt. Every round of fighting only worsens the situation."

Protesting investments too

In Auckland, New Zealand, nearly 100 people rallied last Friday outside the country's sovereign New Zealand Superannuation Fund to protest its investments in Israeli firms such as Israel Chemicals, which they say produces white phosphorus used in bombing Gaza.

Some of the demonstrators chained themselves to desks on the twelfth floor of the organization's headquarters, demanding to speak to CEO Adrian Orr after he had announced earlier that day that the fund has no intention to withdraw its investment in Israel Chemicals, citing no evidence that its products were used against Gazans.

Various initiatives with similar objectives have appeared in many other countries since the beginning of the war in Gaza. And calls to avoid Israeli goods have also surfaced in the West Bank.

Several campaigns in the past tried to persuade Palestinian consumers to boycott settlement produce, but now is the first time such calls have been aimed at any Israeli goods. Last week, a number of Ramallah supermarkets started clearing Israeli products from their shelves.

Activists who visit shops often put stickers on Israeli products that read, "When you buy this product, you are contributing to the Israeli army."

Several radio stations also announced they would allow free advertisement to shops that boycott Israeli produce.

But things are more complicated there. West Bank Palestinians are almost totally dependent on Israel for energy, fuel and water. Even 65% of Palestinian imports come from Israel.

"For the moment, there is now evidence this is a campaign organized by the Palestinian Authority," a source familiar with Israeli-Palestinian trade relations says. "These are local initiatives. There is a reduction in sales, but I believe it won't last for long, primarily for the lack of alternative sources. What would they do? Buy from Jordan? From Saudi Arabia? This could never compete with Israeli products. The West Bank population has gotten used to certain standards. I know of a few cases where Palestinians have already asked their suppliers to pack their groceries in a way that hides they are made in Israel."

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

A Ukrainian In Belgrade: The Straight Line From Milosevic To Putin, And Back Again

As hostilities flare again between Serbia and Kosovo, the writer draws connections between the dissolutions of both the USSR and Yugoslavia, and the leaders who exploit upheaval and feed the worst kind of nationalism.

On the streets of Belgrade, Serbia

Anna Akage

-Analysis-

At high school in Kyiv in the late 1990s, we studied the recent history of Yugoslavia: the details of its disintegration, the civil wars, the NATO bombing of Belgrade. When we compared Yugoslavia and the USSR, it seemed evident to us that if Boris Yeltsin or Mikhail Gorbachev had been anything like Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic, bloody wars would have been unavoidable for Ukraine, Belarus, and other republics that instead had seceded from the Soviet Union without a single shot being fired.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Fast forward to 2020, when I visited Belgrade for the first time, invited for a friend's wedding. Looking around, I was struck by the decrepit state of its roads, the lack of any official marked cabs, by the drudgery, but most of all by the tension and underlying aggression in society. It was reflected in all the posters and inscriptions plastered on nearly every street. Against Albania, against Kosovo, against Muslims, claims for historical justice, Serbian retribution, and so on. A rather beautiful, albeit by Soviet standards, Belgrade seemed like a sleeping scorpion.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ