When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

Criticized At Home And Abroad, Chancellor Scholz Jeopardizes Germany's Leadership In Europe

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s speech shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine was hailed as a “turning point”. But two months on, for some international commentators, the bubble has burst. Some believe this spells the end for Germany’s leadership role in Europe, while others are calling Scholz the country’s worst chancellor since 1949.

Photo of Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) speaks at a press conference

Chancellor Olaf Scholz at a press conference

Cornelia Karin Hendrich

-OpEd-

BERLIN — The German government has come in for criticism from international commentators for its half-hearted support of Ukraine.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Chancellor Olaf Scholz gave a speech that was widely seen as a turning point, and both the German public and the international community believed it marked a new direction for German foreign policy — more money for the army and security, and taking more responsibility for areas of the world in crisis.


But, two months on, it seems that for some international commentators, this hope has soured.

"Worst German chancellor"

Raphaël Glucksmann, a journalist and politician from the left-leaning, environmentally focused French party Place Publique, has said that the war in Ukraine marks the end of Germany’s leadership role in Europe. And he claims that is down to Scholz’s leadership.

Glucksmann, who is the son of the late philosopher André Glucksmann, tweeted: “Chancellor Scholz just confirmed it: We cannot count on Berlin to defend European principles and strategic interests. His position on energy embargo and on weapons delivery shows that the change we all hoped for did not happen. This war puts an end to German leadership in Europe.”

When fascism actually arrived, Germans funded it, and Ukrainians died fighting it.

Glucksmann is not Scholz’s only critic. Donald Tusk, the former President of the European Council and former Polish Prime Minister, tweeted: “The Germans must firmly support Ukraine today if we are to believe that they have drawn conclusions from their own history.”

Last week, Ukraine expert Sergej Sumlenny, former director of the Heinrich Böll Foundation in Kyiv, which is affiliated with the German Green Party, called Scholz the “worst German chancellor” since the Second World War. He said the Greens and the FDP were also responsible for the “disaster chancellor”, as he referred to Scholz. “The blood of our European neighbors is on your hands!”

Photo of \u200bPrime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Joe Biden , Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz at NATO headquarters in Belgium

Japan's Fumio Kishida, Canada's Justin Trudeau, U.S. President Joe Biden and Chancellor Scholz at the G7 summit in Belgium

The Canadian Press/ZUMA

Scholz criticized at home and abroad

U.S. historian Timothy Snyder accused Germany of hypocrisy. “For 30 years, Germans lectured Ukrainians about fascism,” he wrote. “When fascism actually arrived, Germans funded it, and Ukrainians died fighting it.” Snyder was presumably referring to the payments Germany is making to Russia for gas, coal and other energy sources. In 2022, Germany has already paid Russia several billion euros in exchange for energy.

The problem is the chancellor.

Scholz had already come in for criticism from both Ukraine and the country’s eastern European allies over his reluctance to supply heavy weaponry. He supports NATO sending heavy weapons to Ukraine, but does not want them to come directly from Germany. Last week, Ukrainian ambassador Andriy Melnyk said that the government in Kyiv had received the news “with great disappointment and bitterness”.

Scholz has also been criticised by his coalition partners. Green politician Anton Hofreiter and Free Democratic Party (FDP) politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann have both said that the military aid offered to Ukraine is not enough. Hofreiter called the chancellor a “ditherer and procrastinator”, whose vacillation could allow the situation to escalate and develop into a third World War.

“The problem is the Chancellor," he said, warning that every day brings more damage to Germany’s position in Europe and further afield.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

When Did Putin "Turn" Evil? That's Exactly The Wrong Question

Look back over the past two decades, and you'll see Vladimir Putin has always been the man revealed by the Ukraine invasion, an evil and sinister dictator. The Russian leader just managed to mask it, especially because so many chose to see him as a typically corrupt and greedy strongman who could be bribed or reasoned with.

Putin arrives for a ceremony to accept credentials from 24 foreign ambassadors at the Grand Kremlin Palace on Sept. 20.

Sergiy Gromenko*

-OpEd-

KYIV — The world knows that Vladimir Putin has power, money and mistresses. So why, ask some, wasn't that enough for him? Why did he have to go start another war?

At its heart, this is the wrong question to ask. For Putin, military expansion is not an adrenaline rush to feed into his existing life of luxury. On the contrary, the shedding of blood for the sake of holding power is his modus operandi, while the fruits of greed and corruption like the Putin Palace in Gelendzhik are more like a welcome bonus.

In the last year, we have kept hearing rhetorical questions like “why did Putin start this war at all, didn't he have enough of his own land?” or “he already has Gelendzhik to enjoy, why fight?” This line of thinking has resurfaced after missile strikes on Ukrainian power grids and dams, which was regarded by many as a simple demonstration of terrorism. Such acts are a manifestation of weakness, some ask, so is Putin ready to show himself weak?

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

However, you will not arrive at the correct answer if the questions themselves are asked incorrectly. For decades, analysts in Russia, Ukraine, and the West have been under an illusion about the nature of the Russian president's personal dictatorship.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ