When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Notes From The Only Man Who Entered Auschwitz Voluntarily

A Polish army officer got himself deported to Auschwitz to document war crimes in the concentration camp. Now for the first time, Germans can read this vivid account.

Witold Pilecki was imprisoned in Auschwitz for 945 days
Witold Pilecki was imprisoned in Auschwitz for 945 days
Sven Felix Kellerhoff

BERLIN — Death by hanging may not seem so bad when the alternative is to be beaten to death or stabbed in the stomach.

Of course, a place where death by hanging would be considered an improvement is hell on earth — a place no one would go of their own free will. Or almost no one, because Witold Pilecki went to Auschwitz voluntarily and was imprisoned there for 945 days.

Now, 70 years after his escape in April 1943, his written account of daily life in the largest Nazi concentration camp is scheduled to be published in German. It is a shocking document in spite of — or perhaps because of — its broken, often erratic style.

There is no lack of material about Auschwitz, but the account of Pilecki, who died in 1948, brings the horror to life in a way that perhaps no other book has.

The new translation comes from an English version of the original Polish journal, written in the summer of 1945, at a time when there were few other published accounts of what happened in the death camp.

A patriot and Catholic

Pilecki was a Polish farmer and officer, an ardent patriot and religious Catholic. An independent Poland was the most important value in his life next to his family. In 1939, as the tension between Poland’s authoritarian government and Nazi Germany increased, Pileski was called to serve as the captain of a Polish army cavalry unit.

The Polish army’s defeat by the German and Soviet tanks couldn’t entirely stop the fearless Polish cavalry. Pilecki continued to plan attacks against the invaders until the Polish government in exile asked him to organize underground resistance instead of engaging in open fighting. From then on he was was a resistance fighter.

When a new concentration camp was built on the edge of the small village of Oswiecim in a Polish area annexed by Germany — a place that would hold 10,000 prisoners — Pilecki found out about it quickly. At first, most of the prisoners were Poles.

The cavalry captain had an idea: He would inform Poland and Hitler’s Western enemies about the conditions in these camps. At the same time, he hoped to build a resistance organization among the prisoners.

After insisting, Pilecki finally received authorization from the Polish resistance movement to carry out his crazy plan and provoke his own deportation to Auschwitz. He prepared for the mission. In one of the safe houses he found identification papers in the name of Tomasz Serafinski, who more or less looked like him. That’s how he planned to protect his family in case his plan went wrong.

With those papers in his bag, Pilecki intentionally went to a Nazi street raid in Warsaw on Sept. 19, 1940. He knew that the occupiers used these raids to find “supplies” for their new camp.

Arrival in Auschwitz

Two days later Pilecki was taken southwest by train with several hundred other prisoners. “At around 10 p.m. the train stopped somewhere and didn’t travel further,” he wrote. “We could hear roars and screams. The wagon was opened, dogs barked.”

A couple of minutes later, he would learn that a life — or even 11 lives — was worth nothing at Auschwitz. One of the new prisoners was told to walk toward a post before being shot with an automatic weapon. Then 10 more were taken out of the group and killed as “collective punishment” for an escape attempt. The dogs were then set on the bloody corpses.

Pilecki had arrived in Auschwitz. He was promptly shaved, given striped prison clothing and had two teeth knocked out with a club. “I spit the two teeth out,” he wrote. “It bled a little ... You could expect that.”

Pilecki’s book offers a detailed account of life in the camp, where he created a sophisticated social structure among the Polish prisoners, who helped one another and worked toward opportunities for resistance — although even survival was an act of resistance.

After Pilecki’s death in 1948, an anonymous commenter said that, “Among the Poles in the concentration camp, there were many who believed that Poland’s freedom would have to come from him, and they did everything in their power to make sure he made it through alive.”

Lucky escape

For more than two and a half years in the concentration camp, Pilecki registered crimes and their perpetrators. Then he decided to attempt an escape. On April 26, 1943, he managed, along with two comrades, to get away from the camp bakery.

He went back underground and made it back to Warsaw, where he was critical in defending an important road for two weeks during the 1944 Polish uprising. He was taken prisoner of war and held under difficult conditions that were nonetheless not comparable to his experience at Auschwitz. He was released in 1945, and wrote his account of life and survival in the concentration camps before returning home to work toward an independent Poland once again.

Pilecki was openly anti-Communist, and in 1947 the new Stalinist regime in Warsaw had him arrested and tortured because he was collecting evidence of Soviet crimes against Polish soldiers. He refused to cooperate, and so he was sentenced to death in a show trial.

It’s unfortunate that the new German translation doesn’t contain more than a few thin pages about his death at the hands of Poland’s communist government. But at least his notes from his undercover mission at Auschwitz are finally available to a German audience.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Look At This Crap! The "Enshittification" Theory Of Why The Internet Is Broken

The term was coined by journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the fatal drift of major Internet platforms: if they were ever useful and user-friendly, they will inevitably end up being odious.

A photo of hands holding onto a smartphone

A person holding their smartphone

Gilles Lambert/ZUMA
Manuel Ligero


The universe tends toward chaos. Ultimately, everything degenerates. These immutable laws are even more true of the Internet.

In the case of media platforms, everything you once thought was a good service will, sooner or later, disgust you. This trend has been given a name: enshittification. The term was coined by Canadian blogger and journalist Cory Doctorow to explain the inevitable drift of technological giants toward... well.

The explanation is in line with the most basic tenets of Marxism. All digital companies have investors (essentially the bourgeoisie, people who don't perform any work and take the lion's share of the profits), and these investors want to see the percentage of their gains grow year after year. This pushes companies to make decisions that affect the service they provide to their customers. Although they don't do it unwillingly, quite the opposite.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Annoying customers is just another part of the business plan. Look at Netflix, for example. The streaming giant has long been riddling how to monetize shared Netflix accounts. Option 1: adding a premium option to its regular price. Next, it asked for verification through text messages. After that, it considered raising the total subscription price. It also mulled adding advertising to the mix, and so on. These endless maneuvers irritated its audience, even as the company has been unable to decide which way it wants to go. So, slowly but surely, we see it drifting toward enshittification.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest