When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Why Joe Biden's Visit To Israel Was Such A Deep Diplomatic Failure

The American president succeeded in obtaining humanitarian corridors through Gaza, and supported Israel's claims that it wasn't responsible for bombing a Gaza hospital. But in the Arab world, he consolidated his image as Israel's main supporter, and lost the political battle for public opinion.

Why Joe Biden's Visit To Israel Was Such A Deep Diplomatic Failure
Pierre Haski

PARIS — The two million Palestinians living under siege in Gaza will now soon be able to access humanitarian aid waiting for them on the other side of the Egyptian border. Though this was the net result of Joe Biden's whirlwind visit to Israel on Wednesday, the U.S. president had arrived with many other objectives — and they are far from having been achieved.

To say that this trip was affected by Tuesday night's deadly strike on a Gaza hospital would be an understatement. It changed the nature of the American leader's visit, and Biden found himself caught up in the controversy over the origin of that strike.

Biden endorsed the Israeli claim that it was a rocket fired by Islamic Jihad that malfunctioned and fell on the hospital. This is obviously a strong endorsement of the position Israel is trying to put forward, which they argue is based on a number of technical elements.

But in the heated context of the Middle East, even those Arab countries that have established diplomatic relations with Israel, such as the United Arab Emirates, or those who were about to do so, such as Saudi Arabia, are placing the blame squarely on the Jewish state.

The U.S. position and Israel's arguments do not change a thing: the "Arab world" has made up its mind.

To determine whether this trip was a failure, we need to take into account two objectives. The next few days will tell us whether either have been achieved.

A failed trip

The first was to contain the Israeli army's response: Biden did not deny that Israel had the right to defend itself, but he did ask it to respect "the rules of war."

The second was to avoid a regional flare-up. The whole American military deployment in the region — two aircraft carriers in the eastern Mediterranean, bombers in Jordan, as well as Biden's own visit — was designed to send a message to Iran that if a front to the north, with Hezbollah, was to open up, Iran would not walk away unscathed.

Will this message be heard? Tehran's statements are hardly encouraging.

The problem is that Biden wanted to move forward in two directions: solidarity with Israel, and dialogue with Arab leaders. This second political component fell through after the hospital strike.

Israel's biggest supporter

In the eyes of Arabs, the U.S. now appears to be Israel's main supporter, and also bears responsibility for what is happening in Gaza.

This is nothing new, but for years there had been talk of American disengagement from the Middle East. They're up to their necks in it, including yesterday when they vetoed a Brazilian resolution at the UN Security Council calling for "humanitarian peace." France voted in favor of the resolution.

This is all the more problematic for the U.S. as it is losing a power struggle in the Global South, which it has waged with Russia and China. Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping have been together in Beijing for the past two days, celebrating their friendship and reaping the rewards of their pro-Palestinian commitment. They haven't condemned Hamas, and they're calling for peace, which doesn't cost them much.

The most incredible thing about this sequence of events is that the horror of the terrorist attacks of Oct. 7 is already long gone — and the Palestinian question has returned to center stage. It puts the West on the defensive on that other, important battlefield: for world opinion.

— Pierre Haski / France Inter

In other news ...


Venezuelan daily El Periodiquito lends its front page to the easing of U.S. sanctions on Venezuela, after President Nicolás Maduro and the country’s opposition agreed on international supervision of the next elections in the country. The Maracay-based newspaper praises the “temporary lifting” of several Trump-era sanctions imposed on Venezuela, including on the oil and gas sector. The Biden administration still warned that the suspension of sanctions on oil and gas, in force for six months, could be reconsidered if there is no progress toward democratic elections.


The U.S. is experiencing a “historic flight of investors,” reports German daily Die Welt. In troubled markets, investors regularly park their money in safe, stable U.S. government bonds — but despite geopolitical turmoil, that's not happening right now, writes business journalist Holger Zschäpitz. In fact, it’s the exact opposite: Investors are fleeing U.S. bonds amidst fears of slowing growth and political instability in the U.S., where members of the House of Representatives still haven’t managed to agree on a new Speaker.

The situation could create a “vicious circle,” Die Welt notes, where higher interest rates drive financing costs up, in turn creating a need for more new bonds and then higher interest rates – and an even more unstable financial situation.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Violence Against Women, The Patriarchy And Responsibility Of The Good Men Too

The femicide of Giulia Cecchettin has shaken Italy, and beyond. Argentine journalist Ignacio Pereyra looks at what lies behind femicides and why all men must take more responsibility.

photo of a young man holding a sign: Filippo isn't a monster, he's the healthy son of the patriarchy

A protester's sign referring to the alleged killer reads: Filippo isn't a monster, he's the healthy son of the patriarchy

Matteo Nardone/Pacific Press via ZUMA Press
Ignacio Pereyra

Updated Dec. 3, 2023 at 10:40 p.m.


ATHENS — Are you going to write about what happened in Italy?, Irene, my partner, asks me. I have no idea what she's talking about. She tells me: a case of femicide has shaken the country and has been causing a stir for two weeks.

As if the fact in itself were not enough, I ask what is different about this murder compared to the other 105 women murdered this year in Italy (or those that happen every day around the world).

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

We are talking about a country where the expression "fai l'uomo" (be a man) abounds, with a society so prone to drama and tragedy and so fond of crime stories as few others, where the expression "crime of passion" is still mistakenly overused.

In this context, the sister of the victim reacted in an unexpected way for a country where femicide is not a crime recognized in the penal code, contrary to what happens, for example, in almost all of Latin America.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest