When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
South Korea

How China Quietly Poaches Samsung Talent From South Korea

At Samsung's Seoul HQ
At Samsung's Seoul HQ
Lisa Lane

SEOUL — A recently retired senior manager from South Korean electronics giant Samsung is back to work — in China.

Referred to just by his last name, Kim, had been executive director responsible for electronic chip design (D-RAM) at the Seoul-based multinational. But just before he was set to begin his senior position at the Chinese enterprise, Kim received notice from a South Korean court that Samsung had filed a lawsuit against him for not abiding by a "non-compete" clause arrangement, Radio Free Asia reports.

Kim says that he is entitled by the Constitution to have the right of choosing his profession freely. The case awaits adjudication.

For industry veterans who possess core technology and management experience, the pay in China can go as high as eight times that of their South Korean job, an industry insider notes. As the world's largest smartphone and computer manufacturer, accounting for 60% of global semiconductor demand, China relies heavily on high-priced imported chips, mainly from the U.S., South Korea and Taiwan, with less than 15% produced at home.

People fear that South Korea's competitive edge could be eroded.

With its "Made in China 2025 Plan," China aims to raise its local capability to 50% in the next six years. According to H&L Management Consultants, a Taipei-based firm, China has funded the development of its semiconductor industry to the tune of over $22 billion since 2014, aiming to reduce its reliance on foreign-made chips. Hundreds of billions are expected to be invested over the next decade.

The reason why Kim's court case attracted South Korean public opinion is because semiconductors is the only sector where the country is still years ahead of China. People fear that South Korea's competitive edge could be eroded, after mobile phones, display panels, shipbuilding and the automobile industry have all been overtaken, one by one, by China.

According to Radio Free Asia, China has so far poached more than 1,000 talented individuals from South Korea. Previously, Taiwan, one of the world's top three chip makers countries, along with South Korea and the US, was China's favorite country to approach for chip talents, as the two countries share the same language.

According to Epoch Times, China lacks as many as 400,000 engineers for its chip-making ambitions. To fill in the gap quickly, and to avoid struggling through endeavors of research and development, not only is the country luring foreign talents with fat payment packages, it is also encouraging engineers to arrive with commercial secrets, such as design drawings. Among Taiwan's surging litigation cases related to technology theft in recent years, 90% come from Chinese companies.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest