When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Egypt

Beauty Over Brains: Egyptian Media Fixates On Female Ministers

Only three ministers in Egypt's 33-member Cabinet are women. But the media is apparently too dazzled by their looks to notice there's a problem in the first place.

Immigration and Egyptian Expatriate Affairs Minister Nabila Makram
Immigration and Egyptian Expatriate Affairs Minister Nabila Makram
Dalia Rabie

CAIRO — Of the five women in former Prime Minister Ibrahim Mehleb's government, new Prime Minister Sherif Ismail kept only one: Ghada Waly, who retained her position as social solidarity minister. Since first taking on the role in June 2014, she initiated the first phase of Egypt's cash transfer program, and has been the public face of the state's crackdown on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

The only other women in Ismail's Cabinet, both new faces, are Minister of International Cooperation Sahar Nasr, who holds an economics PhD from Cairo University and previously worked as a lead financial economist for the World Bank, and Nabila Makram, who now leads the newly formed Immigration and Egyptian Expatriate Affairs Ministry. Makram is a 20-year veteran of Egypt's diplomatic corps and served in Rome, Dubai and Chicago.

These impressive pedigrees have been obscured by reactions in the press and social media, which are instead focusing on the women's physical attributes. One post making the rounds on social media contains images of the three ministers along with the hashtag "Egypt is becoming prettier." Users lauded their elegance and style, with some saying that what the women do with their new positions is irrelevant.

"The percentage of women in the Cabinet is dreadful," says Dalia Abdel Hameed, head of the gender program at the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR). She contends that this flagrant objectification reinforces the idea that women in government primarily serve as "decoration."

"They are a new flower in a suit's buttonhole," she comments wryly. "People feel entitled to say it smells good or looks bad."

Cabinet "babes" and "beauties"

A fixation on what successful women look like is not unique to Egypt. Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany, has come under scrutiny for her clothing choices and hairstyle, while in the United States, first lady Michelle Obama's dresses have been written about far more than her successful law career.

But in Egypt, recent media reactions have been particularly blantant with regards to sexism and objectification of women. One publication, the privately owned newspaper Sout al-Omma, went so far as to describe the women in question as "The babes of Sherif Ismail's government."

Questioning how the word the pejorative term "mozza" (babe) could be splashed across headlines, Abdel Hameed suggests that such coverage could constitute "verbal harassment" — especially given that a court fined a taxi driver last year after he used the word.

Another article published by the privately owned news site Al Arabiya — "Three "beauties' join Egypt's new Cabinet, but still not enough?" — takes a different angle. It quotes a political sociology professor as saying that the three ministers maintain a "highly westernized" image that may cater to a specific social class.

Such statements reinforce the idea that women are bearers of identity, says Abdel Hameed. "What kind of "authentic" look do you expect?"

On his talk show, Tamer Amin showed a picture of the women, saying they looked presentable and that he was optimistic about the new government. He then asked his camera crew to pan away from the picture, saying, "That's enough guys, come on." Amin then extended a helping hand to the three "delicate" ministers, adding that they are off-limits for criticism until they "toughen up."

Social media users, in the meantime, have juxtaposed pictures of the ministers with photos of prominent female members of the Muslim Brotherhood — a virtual sigh of relief over what might have been.

Such acts highlight a "your women versus our women" mentality, Abdel Hameed explains, showing how women are used in the battleground between the military and the Islamists. She describes these reactions as a "pseudo-celebration," and questions to what extent society would actually accept the proper representation of women in parliament or the Cabinet, or any decision-making position. Hameed also points out that none of the women were appointed to sovereign ministries (meaning the foreign affairs, defense, interior or justice ministries).

Fashion faux pas?

One minister in particular attracted the most attention after she attended the swearing-in ceremony wearing a short-sleeved dress. On his talk show Saturday night, Ahmed Moussa claimed Makram's outfit was "inappropriate." He praised her credentials and said he understood she must be taken aback by her new position and all the attention, but had made the wrong fashion choice.

The critique paved the way for other media outlets to focus on Makram's lifestyle, from her sense of style to how many friends she has on Facebook, shifting the focus even further away from her professional experience.

News sources have called on stylists and etiquette experts to weigh in on the minister's outfit. An anonymous "informed" source told the privately owned newspaper Al-Masry Al-Youm that Makram violated protocol by wearing short sleeves and leaving her hair down. While there is no dress code specified by the president's office for these formal ceremonies, the source said short sleeves and makeup are frowned upon.

Another article in the privately owned Al-Watan quoted a self-described etiquette expert who said that the minister's dress wasn't the best outfit choice. She had no reservations about Makram's hairstyle — she wasn't required to tie it back since she was "not going to school" — but explained that curly hair and extra-long hair would be considered inappropriate.

Yet another news site pointed out that Makram already wore the now-infamous dress to another occasion in 2013, showing a picture from her Facebook profile as proof.

Talk show host Wael al-Ibrashy called Makram to ask her about the commentary during his show on the satellite channel Dream TV. Makram responded by saying she expects criticism as a public figure — but regarding her qualifications, not her appearance.

She brushed off the complaints, saying she stands by what she wore. "I know and understand very well what is appropriate and what is not," she said, citing her long service in diplomacy. "I would like opinions on what I would do with my position, rather than on short or long sleeves."

Abdel Hameed questions the logic behind the backlash, pointing out that Sisi meets other officials abroad who wear whatever they want. And Moussa's rhetoric in particular implies that as a woman, Makram "has to be inferior to Sisi," the researcher argues.

Abdel Hameed says that this kind of regulation of appearances is limited to women. "If one of the ministers was wearing a brown suit, would they have said no, it has to be black?"

As an example, she points to criticism of the education minister, who has garnered attention for the spelling mistakes and outlandish opinions in his Facebook posts. "He is being criticized for his qualifications, but Makram is being judged on her appearance," says Hameed. "No one is talking about qualifications when it comes to female ministers."

"The Egyptian woman is still not empowered," she adds. "No matter how high she is on the career ladder."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest