When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Turkey

A Challenger For Erdogan

The main opposition parties have chosen Edmeleddin Ihsanoglu to run against Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the Aug. 10 presidential election. A summer campaign is about to heat up.

Erdogan and Ihsanoglu are ready to go head-to-head.
Erdogan and Ihsanoglu are ready to go head-to-head.
Suat Kiniklioglu

ISTANBUL — It had been Turkey's hot topic for the past six weeks: who would run as opposition candidate in the August presidential election.

Everyone had a very specific idea about what qualities any potential candidate should have. To face off against the presumed frontrunner, current Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the candidate should be bilingual. He should have government experience. He should understand foreign affairs. He should be tall. He should have blue eyes. He should be from our party. No, he should not be from our party. He should be an academic. He should be a she.

Well, this week, the two major opposition parties, the secularist Republican People's Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) agreed on a consensus candidate who meets many — but not all! — of those criteria: the respected academic and diplomat Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who stepped down in December as Secretary-General of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

A newcomer to Turkish electoral politics, let's consider what awaits Ihsanoglu in the coming two months. He should be prepared, physically, to speak at no fewer than two or three rallies each day (in the summer heat) between now and the first round of voting on Aug. 10. Second, he should be able to set up a team quickly that can prepare a campaign strategy that includes both running logistics and laying out a governing platform.

Across the spectrum

Moreover, Ihsanoglu, 70, will have to attract voters from different political parties and various points of the religious-secular spectrum. The former head of OIC has of course been to a mosque or two in his lifetime, but he will also have to reach out to the social democrat/leftist voters, as well as allaying any suspicions of nationalist voters.

For the first time, the people will directly elect the president, instead of the parliament. Though most of his career has been far from the rough-and-tumble arena of politics, Ihsanoglu will need be able to lead rallies in at least in 60 cities and have the political maneuverability and energy to enter debates with Erdogan, who will most certainly be the ruling AKP party's candidate.

The campaign season will also include the holy month of Ramadan. There is a very slim chance that somebody will win in round one.

Votes from the Kurdish BDP party votes will be very important, assuming the race continues to the second round. Of course, there are also Turkish citizens living abroad who will be able to vote in a Turkish presidential election for the first time.

In short, the period from Aug. 11 — when the results of the first round are announced — until Aug. 23 will be the most exciting period for Turkish politics in memory.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

France, Portrait Of A Nation In Denial — In Our World In Denial

The continuous increase of public debt and a tone-deaf president in France, the rise of authoritarian regimes elsewhere in the world, the blindness to global warming: realities that we do not want to see and that will end up destroying us if we do not act.

Photo of ​police forces in riot gear clashing with demonstrators as piles of garbage burn in Paris on March 23

Police forces clashing with demonstrators as piles of garbage burn in Paris on March 23

Les Echos

-Analysis-

PARIS — In France, the denial of reality seems to be the only thing that all of our public figures have in common: The president (who is right to say that it is his role to propose unpopular measures) refuses to see that other solutions than his own were possible and that institutions will not be sufficient in the long term to legitimize his solitary decisions.

The parliamentary opposition groups refuse to see that they do not constitute a political majority, since they would be incapable of governing together and that they have in common, for too many of them, on both sides of the political spectrum, left and right, only the hatred of money, the mistrust of success, and the contempt for excellence.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest